Search Results

1. LCRO 152/2017 CS v GB (22 May 2018) [pdf, 248 KB]

   ...discourteous, and unprofessional.28 (b) Discussion [100] Ms TC claims that Mr GB spoke to her and Mr CS during the meeting on 23 March 2017 in “a very abrupt, heated way”. She says Mr GB did not treat Mr CS “fairly or respectfully”. [101] For his part, Mr GB says he was “angered” by Ms TC’s “accusation that [he] was colluding with Ms PH” which he regarded as “impugn[ing] his integrity”. He says he then “terminated the meeting” and “could no longer...

2. [2018] NZEnvC 060 Sabatier v Auckland Council [pdf, 5 MB]

   ...the added guidance of matters applied to the determination of an application for an interim injunction, which the courts have found to be essentially of the same nature as interim enforcement applications. (Walden v Auckland Council [1992] NZRMA 101 ; Bray v NZTA [2016] NZEnvC 254). The court is to consider:6 (a) whether there is an arguable (or prima facie) case; (b) what is the balance of convenience for grant/refusal; and (c) what the overall justice of the case is. Mediation...

3. BORA Electoral Finance Bill [pdf, 444 KB]

   ...Election advertisements that promote a party or candidate may only be published by the financial agent of that party or candidate (clauses 55, 60 & 82). Third party election activity must be authorised by the third party's financial agent (clause 101). 5.3 Third party election activity that is subject to regulation includes, in addition to advertising in support of or in opposition to a party or candidate, advertising in support of or in opposition to a type of party or candidate...

4. LCRO 159/2014 AB and RJ v OC and BR [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...incorporated firm, or any employee or former employee of the practitioner or incorporated firm, to pay to the complainant any costs or expenses incurred by the complainant in respect of the inquiry, investigation, or hearing by the Standards Committee. [101] The ability of a Committee to compensate a party under s 156(1)(o) of the Act, is confined to costs and expenses incurred by the complainant in respect of the inquiry, investigation or hearing by the Standards Committee. 16 [...

5. [2018] NZEmpC 83 Kaikorai Service Centre Ltd v First Union Inc [pdf, 904 KB]

   ...(email from McPhail to Dobson / Parker with questions regarding issues arising in the bargaining) No 99 16-Dec-15 Email Neil McPhail – Bryan Dobson / Steve Parker (email from McPhail to Dobson with draft response to union organiser) Yes 101 15-Dec-15 Email Neil McPhail – Bryan Dobson (Dobson emails McPhail with information about an individual union member in response to matters raised by the union in collective bargaining. McPhail acknowledges) Yes 102 16-Dec-15 Email...

6. LCRO 64/2018 IG v PC (1 August 2018) [pdf, 283 KB]

   ...“promptly disputed through proper professional channels”. [100] The Committee did not explicitly address that aspect of r 10.7, which operates as an exemption to the general rule that a solicitor must pay the legal fees of counsel instructed. [101] However, the Committee clearly turned its mind to that issue because it noted:19 [T]here is no record of any … complaint being received from [Mr E] although it was confirmed that [he had] requested, and was sent, a complaint form....

7. [2021] NZACC 29 - Van Essen v ACC (9 February 2021) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...sore; also L calf sore. OE no focal tenderness of wrist, good ROM. A: sprain reasonable to see how goes. OE: L calf – Achilles intact, tender middle of biggest part muscle belly. [100] No injury to her back was noted on that occasion. [101] In April 2015, her GP records that she had had several months of pain which her GP thought could be sciatica. [102] On 15 July 2015, Dr Seale, her GP, noted: In hindsight back pain since injury in December so do ARC18 and add in of ba...

8. Tatana - Estate of Ratahi Tatana (2017) 157 Taitokerau MB 132 (157 TTK 132) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...(Diane Whatuwhiwhi Tatana and Owen Theodore Tatana) BETWEEN VIVIAN MR TATANA Applicant Hearing: 79 Taitokerau MB 259-274 dated 8 April 2013 90 Taitokerau MB 207-251 dated 15 October 2014 89 Taitokerau MB 1-2 dated 13 April 2015 101 Taitokerau MB 259-274 dated 8 April 2014 106 Taitokerau MB 267-324 dated 9 June 2015 106 Taitokerau MB 264-266 dated 8 July 2015 112 Taitokerau MB 11 dated 10 August 2015 112 Taitokerau MB 8-10 dated 8 September 2015 115 Taitokerau...

9. Hauiti v Tamati - Puhunga A7D1 (2017) 68 Tairawhiti MB 100 (68 TRW 100) [pdf, 334 KB]

   ...Copies to: C Bennett, Langley Twigg Lawyers, Napier DX MP70034 R Revington, Woodward Chrisp Solicitors, Gisborne DX LP78507, manaaki.t@wwclaw.co.nz mailto:manaaki.t@wwclaw.co.nz 68 Tairawhiti MB 101 Introduction [1] The applicants’ on behalf of the Keita Kapuarangi Tamati whānau trust have filed an application for a permanent injunction per s 19(1)(a) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 against Emma Tamati (also known as Leah

10. LCRO 382/2013 SC v JT (30 June 2017) [pdf, 193 KB]

    ...interpreted and applied fairly and sensibly,20 and with proper and careful attention to the protective purpose of the disciplinary jurisdiction, its consumer protection objectives, and the need to ensure consistency in the application of those rules. [101] It is important, when considering the conduct, to give a proper consideration to the circumstances which preceded Mr SC’s request of Mr JT. [102] Whilst it is Mr SC’s conduct which is under scrutiny in this review, and it is n...