LCRO 187/2022 JP Limited v YG (6 June 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]
...description of JP’s complaints by [Law firm 1], when they say:6 This complaint has been ongoing for nearly 3 years, during which JP has continuously filed extraordinarily lengthy, verbose responses at every opportunity 4 Findings decision at [101]. 5 LCRO 254/2013. 6 Letter [Law firm 1] to LCRO (10 March 2023) at [6]. 9 including as part of this Review. Much of the content [of Mr LV’s submissions] is repetitive and contains unnecessary details which are, at times, compl...