Search Results

1. [2024] NZREADT 23 – CAC 2106 v Hu (29 July 2024) [pdf, 255 KB]

   ...offer to be re-presented. The vendors’ solicitor informed Mr Urlich on about 9 October that it was rejected. So far as Mr Hu was concerned, the commission sharing agreement was therefore no longer an issue. Direct negotiations with vendors [101] Mr Urlich informed Mr Hu on 12 October 2020 that the purchaser had approached the vendors directly and was attempting to cut Mr Hu out of the deal. They had entered into a private negotiation from which the agency was excluded. [1...

2. Wedgwood v Accident Compensation Corporation (Social rehabilitation) [2024] NZACC 205 [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...or principle; or (b) Taking account of irrelevant considerations; or (c) Failing to take account of relevant considerations; or (d) That the decision is plainly wrong. 9 For example, Waaka v Accident Compensation Corporation [2003] NZACC 101; Gregory v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZACC 118; Pewhairangi v Accident Compensation Corporation [2016] NZACC 294; and McKechnie v Accident Compensation Corporation [2017] NZACC 43. 10 [2010] NZSC 112; [2011] 2 NZLR 1; [2010]...

3. OIA-121395.pdf [pdf, 18 MB]

   ...European European 64% Pacific Peoples Middle Eastern/ Latin American/ African Asian Unknown Māori 13% Pacific Peoples 1% Middle Eastern/Latin American/ African 11% Asian 17% Māori 6% Unknown Age profile 15-19 5 207 115 136 101 81 101 148 male 127 137 97 13 476 276 277 310 117 301 315 female 262 276 219 55-5935-3925-29 65+45-4920-24 60-6440-4430-34 50-54 Gender Memberships Overall Female Female Male Male 30.6%69.4% Ministry Leadership split by gender...

4. [2024] NZEmpC 248 Secretary for Education v Public Service Association [pdf, 456 KB]

   SECRETARY FOR EDUCATION v PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION – TE PŪKENGA HERE TIKANGA MAHI INCORPORATED [2024] NZEmpC 248 [13 December 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZEmpC 248 EMPC 303/2024 IN THE MATTER OF A challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SECRETARY FOR EDUCATION Plaintiff AND PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION – T

5. [2025] NZEmpC 114 VXO v Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora [pdf, 329 KB]

   ............................................................ [99] Proportionality would have been an issue had the plaintiff been dismissed for serious misconduct ............................................................................................ [101] Special leave should have been discussed ........................................................ [103] The dismissal for ill health was open to the NDHB at the time ........................ [107] In conclusion, the plaintiff’s cha...

6. Greensmith v Auckland Council [2025] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 372 KB]

   ...considers that it released all of Ms Greensmith’s personal information contained in the Report in the version it provided her on 29 May 2018. Council considers 21 Sections 27 to 29 of the PA93; ss 49 to 53 of the PA20. 22 Section 87 of the PA93; s 101 of the PA20. 23 Section 29(1)(a) of the PA93. 24 Section 53(d) of the PA20. 10 none of the redactions in that version of the Report concern Ms Greensmith’s personal information. [47] As we understand it, Council also says...

7. [2010] NZEmpC 22 The Chief of Defence Force v Ross-Taylor [pdf, 55 KB]

   ...employee. The defendant’s services were essential to the proper running of the Navy Hospital and she did have some involvement in its administration, for medical purposes. She was 8 [1952] 1 TLR 101 (CA) 9 [1990] 3 NZLR 42 (CA) not, however, integral to the NZDF’s organisation of the Naval Hospital. This test also does not favour the defendant. Fundamental test [40] This test has been variously described as eith...

8. Peters v Eruera - Kaikoura No.4 (2011) 40 Waiariki MB 206 (40 WAR 206) [pdf, 131 KB]

   ...the injunction this Court has previously issued. [12] The relief sought by Mr Handley for the trustees was an injunction against Hiakita (George) Eruera and his immediate family. 6 (1959) 101 CLR 209 40 Waiariki MB 214 Submissions and Evidence for the Respondent [13] Ms Insley submitted that the application should be dismissed pursuant to s. 238 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993, ss. 19 and 24 of the NZ Bill of Rights Ac...

9. Hemi – Te Pupuke E1G1A (2013) 60 Taitokerau MB 151 (60 TTK 151) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...licence is actually to increase the amount of the rates on the property. This is exactly the situation as it applies to general land. Some years ago, Council considered this issue and in particular took into account the provisions of Section 101(2)(e) of the Local Government Act 2002. This section requires every local authority to have a policy for the remission and postponement of rates on Māori freehold land. The 11 th Schedule to that Act sets out the matters that the Coun...

10. Chalecki v ACC [2012] NZACA 15 [pdf, 56 KB]

    ...both parties to the District Court, which the appellant did not exercise. Discussion [31] Mr Forster relied upon the “wider and more generous provisions of the 1982 Act”, in particular the ability to seek a review of a decision under s 101 if dissatisfied with a decision of the Corporation concerning the granting or payment of rehabilitation assistance under the Act, the extended definition of a “decision” in s 2 to include any determination, requirement, assessment,...