Search Results

1. Bratton v Le Lievre - Muriwhenua Incorporation [2017] Māori Appellate Court MB 131 (2017 APPEAL 131) [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...clause) of the LTO was not yet certain and his interpretation as against s 150B(1)(b) of the Act are incorrect. Counsel maintains that the LTO comes within the definition of long- 12 Ibid at [101] 13 Le Lievre v Muriwhenua Incorporation – Muriwhenua Incorporation (2016) 123 Taitokerau MB 240 (123 TTK 240) at [97] to [99] 2017 Maori Appellate Court MB 136 term lease as it has the potential to run over 52 years with the e...

2. Amoroa - Omuriwaka Māori Reservation (2017) 163 Waiariki MB 93 (163 WAR 93) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...assessed in a monetary sense then there would most likely be a debt owed to Tania from Omuriwaka, as her personal koha has a greater value than the debt. This matter is hereby laid to rest unless further mitigating factors arise. 163 Waiariki MB 101 [34] Tania Mihinui is not a responsible trustee. From the evidence before me I gather that she is or was a member of Omuriwaka Incorporation. Tania was present at the March hearing. Matters concerning the misappropriation of...

3. [2017] NZEnvC 134 Bay of Plenty Regional Council v Vision Charitable Trust [pdf, 515 KB]

   ...following decisions where a SUbstantial proportion of an applicant's costs were awarded: Section 285 RMA. 2 Foodstuffs (Otago Southland) Properties Ltd v Dunedin City Council [1996] NZRMA 385. 3 Tasman District Council v Douglas, [2010] NZEnvC 101 at paragraphs [11] and [17]; see also Hele Harvest Ltd v Marlborough District Council (unreported); HC Wellington, CIV-2004-485-1669, 24 February 2005, Wild J. 4 (a) Auckland Council v Lau,4 where the respondents were ordered to pa...

4. Singh v Patel [2019] NZIACDT 17 (28 March 2019) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...2 Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 45(2) & (3). 3 Section 49(3) & (4). 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Section 53(1). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 9 [49] The Tribunal has received from Mr Patel a statement of reply (11 May 2017), together with a letter of submissions of the same date. He does not request an oral hearing. [50] There are no submissions fro

5. WQ v Emberson [2019] NZIACDT 28 (8 May 2019) [pdf, 186 KB]

   ...Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 9 e) maintain each client file for a period of no less than 7 years from closing the file, and make those records available for inspection on request by the Immigration Advisers Authority, and … [48] Prior to...

6. EQE v ICQ [2019] NZIACDT 37 (6 June 2019) [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 7 [35] The complainant has provided a statement of reply and letter, dated 16 August 2018, including supporting documents. He says [the adviser] should have assessed his case thoroughly on her own and not used u...

7. LCRO 109/2020 SV v FT (28 January 2021) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...Standards Committees) Regulations 2008. 14 [100] I agree with the Committee that the apparent reluctance to provide Mr FT with the information requested, contributed to the problems that arose as a consequence of the caveat being lodged. [101] The late Mrs SV had two children, one of whom was excluded entirely from her will. [102] In such circumstances it would not have been unexpected that the disinherited daughter would consider possibility of challenging the will. [103] I...

8. INZ (Gilray) v Croxson [2019] NZIACDT 72 (18 October 2019) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...[2017] NZHC 376 at [93]. 4 Section 50. 5 Section 51(1). 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [97], [128] & [151] (citation omitted). 7 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee, above n 6, at [97], [101]–[102] & [112]. 8 ASSESSMENT [41] The Registrar relies on the following provisions of the Code: General 1. A licensed immigration adviser must be honest, professional, diligent and respectful and conduct themselves with d...

9. LCRO 18/2020 MP v LT (31 August 2020) [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...necessary and appropriate, but any attempt to draw conclusion either way is entirely speculative, and starkly illustrative of the difficulties in assessing a fee in these particular circumstances without having reference to the lawyer’s file. [101] The time records contain references to three instances of work done which is described as “review of current position”. This notation is vague and provides little explanation of what was actually done. [102] In fairness to the la...

10. Kake - Estate of Aldyth Kake (2020) 209 Taitokerau MB 134 (209 TTK 134) [pdf, 294 KB]

    ...and advised that the bill had not been paid and so Carrie paid it on Aldyth’s behalf. It appears she did this because of their close relationship with Aldyth. [33] Mr Shanahan further argued that at the time the will was signed, Aldyth was 101 years old, Ihaia and his wife were caring for her, and they had a close relationship. Mr Shanahan argues this has common features with the case in Wellington. [34] In Wellington, it was not just the testator’s age that was of concern....