Search Results

1. People with finalised charges and convicted of cannabis offences December 2023 [xlsx, 222 KB]

   ...Total 1,988 1,656 2,152 1,776 1,788 1,381 1,521 1,514 1,530 1,399 Manufacture or cultivate illicit drugs Convicted 1,115 1,022 1,088 947 878 712 626 585 527 403 Other proved 85 82 100 85 91 85 84 75 47 44 Not proved 207 165 175 183 172 147 209 165 96 110 Other 1 1 0 3 1 0 6 10 3 1 Total 1,408 1,270 1,363 1,218 1,142 944 925 835 673 558 Possess and/or use illicit drugs (including utensils) Convicted 2,836 2,646 2,712 2,831 2,641 2,436 2,151 1,422 1,459 1,632 Other proved 448 429 40...

2. [2013] NZEmpC 100 NZ Language Centres Ltd Etc v Page [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...hearing before the Court which put remedies at large. Compensation for lost remuneration [4] In its determination dated 25 May 2010, 5 the Authority had awarded the defendant six months remuneration of $55,000 based on an annual salary of $110,000 gross (that is before tax). The defendant now seeks an award for lost 3 [2011] NZCA 608. 4 See Maritime Union of New Zealand v TLNZ Ltd [2007] ERNZ 593 and Hayllar v The Goodtime Fo...

3. [2016] NZEmpC 54 H v A Ltd [pdf, 250 KB]

   ...referred to would be a matter for A Ltd, and would need to be the subject of proper processes. I did not find that an investigation of these matters could not occur. 6 H v A Ltd, above n 1, at [110](g). 7 At [111](b). [44] The first communication from A Ltd to Mr H, following the decision of the Court, was Mr Pearce’s letter of 20 October 2014 to which I have already referred. It confirmed A Ltd had received initi...

4. Carter v Tulip Holdings Ltd [pdf, 180 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 00692 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN ANTHONY DAVID CARTER and MARGARETHA GERTRUIDA CARTER Claimants AND TULIP HOLDINGS LIMITED First respondent (Intituling continued next page) Hearing: 8 & 9 November 2005 Appearances: Grant Shand for the Claimants No appearance by or on behalf of the First respondent John Bierre and Andrew Wedekind for the Fifth respon

5. Gray v Tulip Holdings Ltd [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...parties…Nevertheless the nature of the contractual duties may have considerable relevance in deciding whether or not the builder was negligent. In relation to a claim against an architect, Windemeyer J in Voli v Inglewood Shire Council (1963) 110 CLR 74 put the matter in the following way: …Neither the terms of the architect’s engagement, nor the terms of the building contract, can operate to discharge the CLAIM NO.00499 – GRAY DETERMINATION.doc 32 architect from a duty...

6. Appendix One to Cabinet Paper Reforming the Privacy Act 1993 [pdf, 378 KB]

   ...amended so that the Commissioner is required to continue endeavouring to secure a settlement only where it appears to the Commissioner that settlement is possible. Section 77 sets out procedure after investigation Agree. Minor drafting change. 110 Section 78 should be broadened to encompass all charging complaints. Section 78 sets out procedures in relation to charging Agree. Minor drafting change 112A Consideration should be given to clarifying the position in respect of proce...

7. BORA Immigration Bill [pdf, 480 KB]

   ...persons to provide or produce records, documents and other information, including but not limited to clauses 86 (Responsibilities of carrier and person in charge of commercial craft before it departs from another country to travel to New Zealand), 110 (Obligations on persons leaving New Zealand), 243 (Powers of entry and inspection relating to records of accommodation providers) and 247 (Power of immigration officer to require information and documents where liability for deportation susp...

8. [2018] NZEmpC 79 Hines v Eastland Port Ltd [pdf, 513 KB]

   PAUL HINES v EASTLAND PORT LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 79 [16 July 2018] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2018] NZEmpC 79 EMPC 14/2018 EMPC 47/2018 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN PAUL HINES Plaintiff AND EASTLAND PORT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 23 March, 4 April, 9-13 April and 24 April 2018 (heard at Auckland, Wellington and Gisborne) Appearances:

9. December-2020-Notification-of-Applications-in-Office-of-Chief-Registrar.pdf [pdf, 559 KB]

   ...an succession orders made at 44 Wellington MB 228-229 on 15/07/1966 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100010686 45/93 Raukawa Manahi CJ 2010/79 - Hinerongonui Manahi and a succession order at 240 Rotorua MB 167-169 dated 2 May 1995 A20100011029 45/93 Iwi Courtney CJ 2010/52 - Ohuirua 2 - and easement orders made at 74 Whangarei MB 93 on 29/01/93 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011141 45/93 Peggy Anne Gamble CJ 2010/78 - Hopa Heremaia Trust - Application to the Chief Ju...

10. January Coo Applications [pdf, 552 KB]

    ...an succession orders made at 44 Wellington MB 228-229 on 15/07/1966 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100010686 45/93 Raukawa Manahi CJ 2010/79 - Hinerongonui Manahi and a succession order at 240 Rotorua MB 167-169 dated 2 May 1995 A20100011029 45/93 Iwi Courtney CJ 2010/52 - Ohuirua 2 - and easement orders made at 74 Whangarei MB 93 on 29/01/93 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011141 45/93 Peggy Anne Gamble CJ 2010/78 - Hopa Heremaia Trust - Application to the Chief Ju...