Linstead v Tohu - Te Horo 3 No 1-31 (2024) 276 Taitokerau MB 273 (276 TTK 273) [pdf, 289 KB]
...to rely on a de- amalgamation process that was suggested over 20 years ago that has not been completed. She submits that after 23 years with no progress, one would have expected Mr Linstead to be proactive in finding out what is happening.21 [110] She submits that the applicant and his whānau have not performed their obligations under the de-amalgamation process. They have not obtained boundary agreements with neighbours; they have not selected owners or spokespeople for those own...