Search Results

Search results for 110.

3132 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 104/2018 CJ v MV (28 February 2020) [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...ss 156(1)(e) to (h) [109] Mr CJ has not laid a proper foundation for orders requiring Mr MV to reduce or cancel his fees, refund money to Mr CJ or rectify his error at his own expense. No orders can be made on those bases. Costs on review [110] The LCRO has a discretion over costs on review pursuant to s 210 of the Act. The LCRO’s Costs Orders Guidelines anticipate that a lawyer who challenges a Committee’s determination will contribute to costs on review. [111] Mr MV di...

  2. Director of Proceedings v Brooks [2019] NZHRRT 37 [pdf, 828 KB]

    ...meconium 1 A cardiotocogram (CTG) is a machine used to electronically monitor a baby's heart rate and a mother's contractions while the baby is in the uterus. It continuously prints out on paper record. A normal FHR during labour is between 110 and 160 beats per minute. 2 Listening to the FHR intermittently using a hand-held ultrasound device called a doppler. 3 Established (or active) labour is when the cervix is dilating from 4 to lOcms accompanied by regular and strong contr...

  3. LCRO 39/2019 Yuri Lukas v BW and CV (29 November 2019) [pdf, 151 KB]

    ...consumers of legal services40 and to maintain public confidence in the provision of legal services. [109] Mr Lukas has done neither and I am minded to order publication of this decision pursuant to s 206(4) of the Act, including Mr Lukas’ name.41 [110] Before doing so I will give the parties a period of two months to make submissions in favour of, or against, this proposal. I am unlikely to grant an extension of this time period unless the interests of justice require so. DA...

  4. LCRO 215/2018 WN v ZD (31 October 2019) [pdf, 162 KB]

    ...legal executive from Ms ZD’s office forwarded Ms ZD an email advising that Mr WN had left a message making request for Ms ZD to contact him. In this message, Mr WN indicated that he was wanting to find out what had happened at the hearing. [110] Ms ZD says that she spoke to Mrs WN after the hearing and advised Mrs WN that the hearing had been adjourned and informed her of the date the matter had been adjourned to. [111] Ms ZD’s evidence of this exchange is a file note which u...

  5. LCRO 80/2019 ZB v YC (18 August 2021) [pdf, 204 KB]

    ...advances the undertaking issue any further one way or the other, except to the extent that it contains no criticism of Mr YC and did not result in the judge referring that aspect of his conduct of the [XD] proceedings, to the Complaints Service. [110] Indeed, Mr TJ advanced argument to the effect that although best (and probably High Court Rules based) practice was to secure the signatures of all liquidators to an undertaking as to damages, as a matter of law the signature of one li...

  6. [2019] NZCAA 13 (5 August 2019) [pdf, 384 KB]

    ...parent company is repaying the appellant for the trade discounts, when providing the transfer pricing credit required by Inland Revenue. The netting off produces an additional $5 to the cost of the product at the border, giving a difference of $110 in this illustration. 11 [30] If the appellant and its parent company used pricing that conformed to Inland Revenue’s determination during the year without the need for a credit, using the illustrative figures Customs’...

  7. LCRO 68/2021 BU - Application for review of a prosecutorial decision (30 July 2021) [pdf, 190 KB]

    ...1 Deliu v Hong [2012] NZHC 158, [2012] NZAR 209 at [39]–[41]. 2 Deliu v Connell [2016] NZHC 361, [2016] NZAR 475 at [2]. 7 Statutory framework for the prosecution decision [31] In EB: Application for Review of a Prosecutorial Decision LCRO 110/2017 (20 November 2017), the Review Officer summarised the approach adopted by Standards Committees when considering a decision to refer a practitioner to the Disciplinary Tribunal. That analysis is summarised in paragraphs [32] to [43]...

  8. LCRO 211/2020 BU - Application for review of a prosecutorial decision (30 July 2021) [pdf, 233 KB]

    ...available material afresh, including the Committee’s decision; and (b) Provide an independent opinion based on those materials. Statutory framework for the prosecution decision [30] In EB (Application for review of a prosecutorial decision) LCRO 110/2017 (20 November 2017), the LCRO summarised the approach adopted by Standards Committees when considering a decision to refer a practitioner to the Disciplinary Tribunal. That analysis is summarised in paragraphs [31] to [42] that...

  9. [2023] NZREADT 5 – KM v Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 2102) (20 March 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...parties’ attention to s 116, setting out the right of appeal to the High Court. 16 The appellant’s submissions (20 January 2023) at p 3. 17 At 194 of the Appeal Bundle. 18 Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s 123. 20 PUBLICATION [110] The Committee directed publication of its decision, without stating the names of the licensee and the agency. [111] In light of the outcome of this appeal and having regard to the interests of the parties and of the public, it is ap...

  10. [2022] NZEnvC 119 Mangawhai Harbour Restoration Society Inc v Northland Regional Council [pdf, 1.7 MB]

    ...AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2022] NZEnvC 119 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under clause 14 of Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN MANGAWHAI HARBOUR RESTORATION SOCIETY (ENV-2019-AKL-110) FEDERATED FARMERS OF NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2019-AKL-114) HORTICULTURE NEW ZEALAND (ENV-2019-AKL-116) MINISTER OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2019-AKL-122) Appellants AND NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Envir...