Search Results

1. Protection order applications December 2021 [xlsx, 93 KB]

   ...years 31 48 60 65 56 49 34 38 30 27 5% 6% 6% 7% 5% 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 20 to 29 years 218 318 325 300 351 315 308 282 299 241 32% 39% 35% 31% 31% 29% 29% 28% 27% 25% 30 to 39 years 114 166 157 172 204 210 196 201 231 209 17% 20% 17% 18% 18% 20% 18% 20% 21% 22% 40 to 49 years 83 90 97 94 129 113 116 101 140 110 12% 11% 10% 10% 12% 11% 11% 10% 13% 11% 50 years or more 35 34 67 53 74 65 85 78 63 78 5% 4% 7% 5% 7% 6% 8% 8% 6% 8% Unknown 196 158 235 280 302 322 324 313 351 295 29% 19% 25% 29% 2...

2. [2022] NZACC 30 – Estate of Su v ACC (3 March 2022) [pdf, 380 KB]

   ...deceased’s family, there is no evidence of that. The deceased’s rapid decline and death on 28 March 2019 followed his readmission to hospital on the previous day, a day on which the deceased and his son actually left the ward for four hours. [110] And, as the Court said in Adlam:9 [52] In order for there to be a failure to provide treatment, we consider there must have been some indication at the time of the failure that the treatment not provided should have been provided....

3. [2021] NZACC 191 - Smith v ACC (1 December 2021) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...physiotherapist and his GP there was a good relationship with those professionals that was ongoing. That being so it is frankly inconceivable that neither should make mention of a significant injury alleged to have occurred on 6 December 2010. [110] The existing notes from both are brief but they are “matter of fact” and unremarkable. I am driven to conclude therefore that there was no incident, of the type described by the appellant in his affidavit, on 6 December 2010. Theref...

4. LCRO 208/2020 & LCRO 214/2020 JA v RR and RR v JA (8 October 2021) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...of the public are properly served by publication of the case in a format which adequately, as the Committee’s decision does, informs the public of the facts of the case and the standards expected of a practitioner. Orders for refund of fees [110] I see no basis to interfere with orders that Mr RR refund fees in the sums as directed by the Committee. Costs [111] No order is made against either party in regard to the costs of this review. Anonymised publication [112] Pursuant...

5. LCRO 139/2020 MX v RJ and DJ (30 September 2021) [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...Ms MX to file proceedings in the court against the executors in their personal capacity. Those proceedings were filed in August 2019. This, says Ms DJ, prompted the practitioners to reassess the viability of maintaining the funds on-call. [110] Against this, Ms MX submitted that it must have been compellingly obvious to the executors in July 2019 that prospects of settlement were remote. [111] She does not consider that indication of possible agreement on the indemnity issue cou...

6. People charged and convicted of psychoactive substances offences June 2022 [xlsx, 96 KB]

   ...outcome 2013/2014 2014/2015 2015/2016 2016/2017 2017/2018 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 Sale and/or supply Convicted 7 53 74 76 74 80 36 29 11 Other proved 8 3 1 4 0 0 0 1 0 Not proved 3 14 15 30 26 19 13 14 4 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Total 18 70 90 110 100 99 50 44 15 Possession Convicted 7 37 45 68 95 61 32 22 13 Other proved 2 4 5 4 4 0 0 0 0 Not proved 0 1 10 11 19 14 4 3 2 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 9 42 60 83 118 75 36 25 15 Other offences Convicted 9 5 5 1...

7. [2023] NZEmpC 45 Wiles v The Vice-Chancellor of the University of Auckland [pdf, 281 KB]

   ...Professor Wiles generally. Paragraphs 56–66, 72–93 and 118 of Professor Rishworth’s brief of evidence are struck out by consent. In addition, paragraphs 20, from the third sentence to “So” at the start of the last sentence, 29, 35– 55, 70, 110–113 and 115 are struck out as being on matters of law. The remainder of the brief of evidence is allowed. [51] The brief of evidence of Associate Professor Hoskins is allowed in. I accept that she has relevant expertise in t...

8. Horowhenua-District-Council-Cover-Letter-Form-7a-and-Form-18-20221101.pdf [pdf, 534 KB]

   ...202582 1.5359 91 Lot 2 DP 349423 202581 1.523 95 Lot 6 DP 378600 Road 0.598 96 Lot 8 DP 349423 Road 0.0709 99 Part Lot 4 DP 349423 202583 0.93 100 Section 3 SO 416937 Road 0.054 103 Lot 1 DP 472237 643026 0.775 104 Lot 5 DP 408558 431105 1.198 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENT FOR A DESIGNATION OF LAND 4 Land Parcel ID (as shown on the plans) Legal Description Record of Title Required Area (ha)(approx.) 105 Section 1 SO 416937 Road 0.02 106 Section 4 SO 416937 R...

9. Williamson v Accident Compensation Corporation (Suspension of Entitlements) [2023] NZACC 002 [pdf, 356 KB]

   ...to only occur when the rehabilitation plan is complete, and where vocational independence is “likely”. I also draw your attention to the Supreme Court case of McGrath v ACC1 where the Supreme Court decision of McGrath v ACC under section 110(3) of the Act 2001 clarified the Act as follows … “ACC must not require a claimant to participate in a vocational independence assessment unless the claimant is likely to achieve vocational independence, and not before the claimant h...

10. Beker v Accident Compensation Corporation Costs on Review and Weekly Compensation [2023] NZACC 12 [pdf, 272 KB]

    ...accident, the suprascapular injury and its consequences. [62] Mr Gascoigne submits that the vocational independence decision applied to all the relevant covered injuries, including the suprascapular injury and its consequences. Pursuant to s 110 of the Act, Mr Beker no longer had incapacity for employment in respect of his covered personal injuries suffered to the point of the vocational independence decision, regardless of whether he otherwise remained incapacitated in respect of...