Search Results

1. [2018] NZEnvC 061 Friends of Nelson Haven and Tasman Bay Inc & Treble Tree Holdings Ltd v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 5.2 MB]

   ...when the holder of the permit applies under section 67 J or section 67Q of the Fisheries Act 1983 to the chief executive of Biodiversity Defence Society Inc v Solid Energy New Zealand Ltd [2013] NZEnvC 195 at [1]-[3]. [56]. [62]-[63]. [67]-[73]. [110]. [114]-[121] . Biodiversity Defence Society Inc v Solid Energy New Zealand Ltd [2013] NZHC 3283. (2013) 17 ELRNZ 337. at [1]-[4]. [18]-[19]. [61]. [64]. [78]. [82]-[89]. Biodiversity. (High Court) above citation. at [61]. Katz v Auckland...

2. MLC 2017 February Oustanding OCR Applications [pdf, 269 KB]

   ...A20100009982 45/93 Deputy Registrar CJ 2010/47 - Jane Smith also known as Jane McKenzie or Jane Parapa or Jane Parepa or Jane Fraser - an succession orders made at 44 Wellington MB 228- 229 on 15/07/1966 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011029 45/93 Iwi Courtney CJ 2010/52 - Ohuirua 2 - and easement orders made at 74 Whangarei MB 93 on 29/01/93 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011141 45/93 Peggy Anne Gamble CJ 2010/78 - Hopa Heremaia Trust - Application to the Chief Ju...

3. [2021] NZEmpC 66 Smartlift Systems Ltd v Armstrong [pdf, 320 KB]

   ...relevance of the principles describing a spectrum of outcomes in Richora Group Ltd v Cheng.15 [109] In that judgment, three bands were identified as follows: • Band 1: up to $10,000 • Band 2: $10,000 to $40,000 • Band 3: $40,000 plus [110] This case was indeed one which fell in the lower end of the spectrum, which was Band 1. It was erroneous to determine on the present facts that a higher amount was appropriate. A range of $8,000 to $10,000 would have been appropria...

4. LCRO 175/2020 PM obo MNO Limited v FS and BL (22 April 2021) [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...payment will retire the matter … ” was a conventional expression which means “please confirm whether this final payment will retire the matter … ” Mr PM also said that the words “I trust”, convey that he is asking a question. [110] I cannot agree with Mr PM’s argument that his reconciliation letter amounted to a request for confirmation as to amounts outstanding. [111] Read as a whole, it is clear to me that Mr PM’s reconciliation letter included (if not compr...

5. LCRO 163/2020 DM v TN and EX (9 April 2021) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...also consider whether Mr TN’s conduct was a breach of s 12(a) of the Act. To some extent there is overlap between r 3 and s 12(a), and I regard a finding that Mr TN breached r 3 of the Rules adequately reflects his failures on this occasion. [110] I further find this breach to be unsatisfactory conduct by Mr TN, pursuant to s 12(c) of the Act. Mr EX [111] Mr EX also appears to have acted with reasonable diligence when first instructed by Mr DM. [112] He received Mr DM’s f...

6. LCRO 50/2017 TG v JT and TAP LIMITED (26 January 2018) [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...Committee examining a lawyer’s professional or ethical conduct to be given access to any material that it considers may be relevant to that inquiry. The exception is lawyer-client privilege, as specifically provided for in s 271 of the Act. [110] This gives effect to the consumer protection focus of the Act. Proper disciplinary inquiry unconstrained by evidential rules, achieves the consumer protection objective by enabling a Committee to impose sanction where appropriate on a l...

7. LCRO 190/2020 JG v VK (23 March 2021) [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...concise and succinct form, the information that Police required when considering exercising its discretion to implement a border alert, before the Court had been given opportunity to consider the merits of an application to prevent removal. [110] Mr TF’s correspondence (appropriately pp’d by Ms VK) recorded that: (a) [Law Firm A] acted for Ms JG; and (b) Ms JG had care of the children pursuant to an order of the Federal Magistrates Court of [Country]; and (c) Ms JG was conce...

8. MLC 2017 July Outstanding OCR Applications [pdf, 345 KB]

   ...Puna - and orders made at 133 Napier MB 159-161 on 22/09/1992 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100010686 45/93 Raukawa Manahi CJ 2010/79 - Hinerongonui Manahi and a succession order at 240 Rotorua MB 167-169 dated 2 May 1995 A20100011029 45/93 Iwi Courtney CJ 2010/52 - Ohuirua 2 - and easement orders made at 74 Whangarei MB 93 on 29/01/93 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011141 45/93 Peggy Anne Gamble CJ 2010/78 - Hopa Heremaia Trust - Application to the Chi...

9. MLC 2017 May Outstanding OCR Applications [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...A20100009982 45/93 Deputy Registrar CJ 2010/47 - Jane Smith also known as Jane McKenzie or Jane Parapa or Jane Parepa or Jane Fraser - an succession orders made at 44 Wellington MB 228- 229 on 15/07/1966 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011029 45/93 Iwi Courtney CJ 2010/52 - Ohuirua 2 - and easement orders made at 74 Whangarei MB 93 on 29/01/93 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011141 45/93 Peggy Anne Gamble CJ 2010/78 - Hopa Heremaia Trust - Application to the Chief Ju...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 84 The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development v Tuilaepa [pdf, 205 KB]

    ...views about the incident in the way she did before interviewing Mr Tuilaepa, it is obvious from her letter of 21 September 2015 that 10 De Bruin v Canterbury District Health Board [2012] NZEmpC 110, [2012] ERNZ 431. she was prepared to listen to and consider what he had to say. From the notes of the meeting on 7 October 2015, it is apparent that a detailed conversation took place in which she asked him why he used force an...