Search Results

Search results for 110.

3132 items matching your search terms

  1. November 2016 outstanding applications [pdf, 216 KB]

    ...A20100009982 45/93 Deputy Registrar CJ 2010/47 - Jane Smith also known as Jane McKenzie or Jane Parapa or Jane Parepa or Jane Fraser - an succession orders made at 44 Wellington MB 228- 229 on 15/07/1966 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011029 45/93 Iwi Courtney CJ 2010/52 - Ohuirua 2 - and easement orders made at 74 Whangarei MB 93 on 29/01/93 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011141 45/93 Peggy Anne Gamble CJ 2010/78 - Hopa Heremaia Trust - Application to the Chief Ju...

  2. December 2016 outstanding applications [pdf, 226 KB]

    ...A20100009982 45/93 Deputy Registrar CJ 2010/47 - Jane Smith also known as Jane McKenzie or Jane Parapa or Jane Parepa or Jane Fraser - an succession orders made at 44 Wellington MB 228- 229 on 15/07/1966 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011029 45/93 Iwi Courtney CJ 2010/52 - Ohuirua 2 - and easement orders made at 74 Whangarei MB 93 on 29/01/93 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011141 45/93 Peggy Anne Gamble CJ 2010/78 - Hopa Heremaia Trust - Application to the Chief Ju...

  3. MLC 2017 January Outstanding OCR Applications [pdf, 269 KB]

    ...A20100009982 45/93 Deputy Registrar CJ 2010/47 - Jane Smith also known as Jane McKenzie or Jane Parapa or Jane Parepa or Jane Fraser - an succession orders made at 44 Wellington MB 228- 229 on 15/07/1966 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011029 45/93 Iwi Courtney CJ 2010/52 - Ohuirua 2 - and easement orders made at 74 Whangarei MB 93 on 29/01/93 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011141 45/93 Peggy Anne Gamble CJ 2010/78 - Hopa Heremaia Trust - Application to the Chief Ju...

  4. Complaints Assessment Committee 408 v Reed [2017] NZREADT 6 [pdf, 226 KB]

    ...standard of proof.18 [82] We reject the submission that Mr Reed innocently and genuinely believed that he was acting correctly. The submission can be given little weight in light of the 17 Section 110(1) of the Act. 18 See Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2009] 1 NZLR 1; Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 301) v Murphy [2015] NZREADT 42, at [79]. importance of the obligations, and the fact that he is a licensee w...

  5. Legal aid grants June 2019 [xlsx, 98 KB]

    ...5,599,516 $ 5,748,427 $ 6,088,199 6% Waitangi Tribunal - - $ 12,642,289 $ 9,161,990 $ 12,503,122 $ 13,879,009 $ 13,663,534 $ 15,487,388 $ 15,871,030 $ 16,409,801 3% Total - - $ 127,997,048 $ 102,268,986 $ 109,532,415 $119,110,239 $ 125,406,122 $132,281,857 $147,865,231 $165,805,345 12% 2.Grants by region Table 2a: Number of criminal legal aid grants, by region, 2009/2010 - 2018/2019 For more information on how to interpret these figures, please read the definit...

  6. INZ (Calder) v Chiv [2019] NZIACDT 73 (21 October 2019) [pdf, 240 KB]

    ...the complainant and Mr Chiv may reply to submissions of any other party by 26 November 2019. 22 ORDER FOR SUPPRESSION [109] The Tribunal has the power to order that any part of the evidence or the name of any witness not be published.33 [110] There is no public interest in knowing the name of Mr Chiv’s clients. [111] The Tribunal orders that no information identifying the clients is to be published other than to the parties. ___________________ D J Plunkett Chair...

  7. Dowsons v CAC 409 & Franklin and Franklin v CAC 409 & Dowsons [2019] NZREADT 15 [pdf, 255 KB]

    ...deprive the Tribunal of its proper role in considering whether conduct within the industry amounts to misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct. In such a situation a CAC should lay alternative charges, or allow the Tribunal the opportunity, under s 110(4) of the Act, to find unsatisfactory conduct rather than misconduct , if it is not satisfied as to misconduct, but is satisfied that the licensee has engaged in unsatisfactory conduct: that is, to “downgrade” the charge from miscon...

  8. LCRO 272/2016 XK v JB (24 June 2019) [pdf, 346 KB]

    ...mortgage, was obliged to go.19 [108] Mr JB ensured that this occurred. [109] There is a further issue in relation to Mr B’s estate. As indicated, the consent order was designed to settle all estate issues so that it could be finally distributed. [110] Ms XK maintains that this occurred in March 2010 (at the time of the consent order), and that after then, there was no need for Mr JB to have ongoing involvement as trustee.20 19 La...

  9. Singh v Ryan - [2019] NZIACDT 76 (8 November 2019) [pdf, 293 KB]

    ...has breached cl 3(c) of the Code. 13 Registrar of Immigration Advisers v Ryan [2019] NZIACDT 75, particularly at [176] & [184]. 14 Immigration Act 2009, s 342(1). 18 SUBMISSIONS ON SANCTIONS [110] As the complaint has been upheld, the Tribunal may impose sanctions pursuant to s 51 of the Act. [111] A timetable is set out below. Any request for repayment of fees or the payment of costs or expenses or for compensation must be acc...

  10. Clarke v Overington - Maketu A Section 39 (2019) 215 Waiariki MB 95 (215 WAR 95) [pdf, 365 KB]

    ...Dennett’s arguments that there has been no error in the change of status orders but rather an error in the recording of ownership, given subsequent orders have been made based upon the ownership being recorded as tenants in common, I 215 Waiariki MB 110 am of the view that it would be more appropriate for this matter to be dealt with by application to the Chief Judge pursuant to s 44 of the Act. This will determine what errors have occurred and if there was an error, what a...