Search Results

1. [2022] NZACC 19 - McBryde v ACC (9 February 2022) [pdf, 453 KB]

   ...followed to a point where in February 2016, 22 years after the accident he said: My pain levels reached a point where I was so sick with pain, I was vomiting. My wife Donna called an ambulance after I turned grey and clammy and passed out. [110] The orthopaedic registrar arranged an urgent spinal MRI which showed a large calcified prolapsed thoracic disc bulging out and constricting his spinal cord. [111] Mr McBryde says that this was the same part of his back that was sore e...

2. May-2023-Notification-of-Applications-in-Office-of-Chief-Registrar.pdf [pdf, 427 KB]

   ...Application to the Chief Judge to amend orders of the Court A20100008782 45/93 Te Ata Piripi CJ 2010/41 - Te Pare Piripi or Pare Piripi - and succession orders made at 42 Mercer MB 274 dated 11 March 1964 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011029 45/93 Iwi Courtney CJ 2010/52 - Ohuirua No.2 - and an easement order made at 74 Whangarei MB 93-94 on 29 January 1993 - Application to the Chief Judge A20100011859 45/93 Hirini Pakia Manihera (Jnr) CJ 2010/85 - Motatau 3P, Motatau 5...

3. Horizon-Regional-Council-Cover-letter-Form-7a-and-Form-9-20221101.pdf [pdf, 608 KB]

   ...Ann Smith 95 Lot 6 DP 378600 6910058 Road 96 Lot 8 DP 349423 6751742 Road 99 202583 Part Lot 4 DP 349423 7158244 Her Majesty the Queen 100 Section 3 SO 416937 7158247 Road 103 643026 Lot 1 DP 472237 7601194 Her Majesty the Queen 104 431105 Lot 5 DP 408558 7217185 Andrew Raymond Seaforth Brown 105 Section 1 SO 416937 7158245 Road RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION 8 106 Section 4 SO 416937 7158248 Road 108 643027 Lot 2 DP 472237 7601195 Her Majesty the Queen 1...

4. [2024] NZEnvC 166 Scaife v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 3 MB]

   ...numbers in the Matakauri Rural Visitor Zone: NC 46.5.12A.1: The combined total maximum number of overnight guests and/or day visitors for visitor accommodation and commercial recreational activities and ancillary onsite staff accommodation is 110 persons per day. 46.5.12B For visitor accommodation, buildings in the Matakauri Rural Visitor Zone must be of a size and configuration that does not allow: RD Discretion is restricted to: 46. Rural Visitor Zone Proposed:...

5. LCRO 121/2023 AI v HR (12 December 2023) [pdf, 218 KB]

   ...the wife’s assets without instructions to do so would have constituted unethical conduct on the respondent’s part. I make that observation in relation to all aspects of the negotiation of the agreement and to the execution of the agreement. [110] The respondent did not act for the wife on the Court proceedings, so no issue arises as to any overriding duties to the Court. (m) Was the respondent discourteous or disrespectful towards the applicant? [111] I raise this as a potential...

6. LCRO 130/2022 FN v EO (31 October 2023) [pdf, 261 KB]

   ...indication that Mr FN exhibits some degree of indifference to the need to comply with professional standards, and I consider the manner in which this concern should be expressed, is to increase the fine imposed from $5,000 to $7,500. Fee [110] The Committee ordered that the fee of $9,230.43 relating to service of the statutory demand and liquidation, be reduced to $1,500 plus GST and disbursements of $172.50. [111] Mr FN has accepted that reduction. [112] The Committee or...

7. [2023] NZEnvC 206 Woolley v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 384 KB]

   ...wording in the grant of consent allowing the water to be used for irrigation of a vineyard. I consider that highly unlikely. [109] The reader may consider that U060329 provides for a large abstraction. However, that is a merit issue. 26 [110] On the authority of Gillies, Mr Parker’s (changed) opinion as to the relevance of incorporation of the consumption schedule and the omission of an allocation rate for vineyards cannot factor into my consideration. Mr Parker brings s...

8. LCRO 131/2022 GN, YL and EK v FQ (30 June 2023) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...2080. 21 [109] I do not consider there is force in the applicants’ submission that the concerns addressed by the Judge and specialist Panel, had a different scope or focus, to the concerns that were put before the Standards Committee. [110] It is my view that the complaints put before the Standards Committee, whilst likely presented in more comprehensive and detailed manner, reduced to their essence, encapsulated precisely the issues of complaint that were put before the Family...

9. LCRO 136/2023 QT v MZ (8 January 2024) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...antagonism towards TL improperly misdirected against her lawyer, the respondent, and an attempt to argue factual and legal issues in the wrong forum. As such, I find that it is also an abuse of the complaints and review processes. Decision [110] Pursuant to s 205(1)(c) and (d) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the application for review of the decision of the Standards Committee is hereby struck out as being both vexatious and an abuse of process. Publication [111]...

10. Sawyer v Victoria University of Wellington (Strike Out) [2024] NZHRRT 9 [pdf, 260 KB]

    ...being adjudged bankrupt on 23 March 2021. [69] The Tribunal has sympathy with this application by VUW. The Tribunal’s power to award costs in respect of proceedings under the Privacy Act is, nevertheless, limited by statute, being conferred by s 110 of the PA 2020. While the Tribunal may award costs against either party (whether or not it makes any other order), there is no ability for the Tribunal to order security for costs. [70] We do note, however, that litigants in person...