Search Results

1. July Notification of Applications in Office of Chief-Registrar [pdf, 408 KB]

   ...45/93 Hirini Paika Manihera CJ 2010/85 - Motatau 3P, Motatau 5 and Ngati Hine H2B – against the Partition and Ngati Hine amalgamation Order’s made at 50 Whangarei MB 268-294 on 23 December 1974 - Application to the Chief Judge A20110001330 45/93 Beverley Rewa McGhie (nee Wilson) CJ 2011/1 - Tamati Mihaka - Application to the Chief Judge A20110003034 45/93 Lucy Tapsell CJ 2011/12 - Pera Wikiriwhi or Pera Matataia – Succession orders made at 203 Rotorua MB 1...

2. [2016] NZEmpC 120 Whanau Tahi Ltd v Dasari [pdf, 211 KB]

   ...14 Karelrybflot AO v Udovenko [2000] 2 NZLR 24 (CA) at [36]-[37]. 15 Brisbane City Council v Group Projects Pty Ltd (1979) 26 ALR 525 (HCA) at 536. 16 The Sea Angel, above n 12, at [110]. 17 Burrows, Finn and Todd, above n 3, at 757. Illegal Contracts Act [55] The causes of action pleaded, and the possible relationship of one to the other, are a little difficult to discern. The position is not exactly clar

3. Blueskin Amenity and Landscape Society (BALS) (dated 1 June 2017) [pdf, 850 KB]

   ...(for noise, as 7 Even Mr Farrell (§6[b]) has to concede: “The increase in size of the turbine does not reduce (and may increase) [our emphasis] the visual amenity effects on Mr Mursa at 110 Porteous Road”. 9 well visual considerations). In this case, it has to be borne in mind that the neighbouring properties are small in size, to the extent that the “wider setting” is in effect, the entire property. If the p...

4. LCRO 240/2013 TM v DC (8 May 2017) [pdf, 365 KB]

   ...receipt of his instructions. [109] Whilst I am satisfied that Ms DC failed to follow her client’s instructions, I am not satisfied that her failure was of the degree of seriousness and significance that would merit a disciplinary response. [110] In my view, it was inevitable considering the circumstances of this case, that the parties would be directed to attend mediation. Underpinning much of the philosophy and approach of the law engaging employment disputes, is the intention...

5. Macolm - Okataina 10 (2001) 206 Rotorua MB 287 (260 ROT 287) [pdf, 5.8 MB]

   ...together when there is sufficient reference in the document which constitutes the signed memorandum or note to the other document or documents. For this proposition reference need only be made to Timmins v Moreland Street Property Co Ltd [1958] Ch 110 and Sanderson v Purchase [1958] NZLR 588. As was said by Jenkins LJ in Timmins at p130 there can be a note or memorandum 'which while containing in itself all the necessary ingredients of the required memorandum, does contain some refe...

6. Hahn v Walke [2019] NZIACDT 19 (8 April 2019) [pdf, 306 KB]

   ...elsewhere in the world, one of which was even held in Auckland. It is self-evident that Ms Walke will be aware of this. Aside from the articles, she is the founder of the group and a director of one of the companies hosting the seminars. [110] In terms of New Zealand law, the German licences of Mr Walke and Ms Walke do not excuse her conduct in facilitating his behaviour, any more than they excuse his behaviour. They are irrelevant.

7. Noble - Estate of Rameka Korewha Ngamanu [2019] Chief Judge's MB 132 (2019 CJ 132) [pdf, 429 KB]

   ...would have expected to have seen reference or discussion of it in the Court minutes. Omanaia A1 30. Omanaia A1 was formerly known as Horotiu B6, it is a wahi tapu called Pukerewa and was originally a pā site. 31. At 23 Hokianga MB 110 (7 December 1952) the Court issued a consolidated order pursuant to the Native Land Act 1931, vesting the land in Rameka Korewha Ngamanu and nine others as joint tenants. 32. At 145 Whangarei MB 32 - 33 (4 February 2010) the Court hear...

8. LCRO 213/2015 HY Trust v AK and GJ (21 Janaury 2019) [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...by its parent company … 8 At [54]. 9 At [87]. 10 At [93]. 11 At [96]. 12 Frazer v Walker [1967] 1 AC 569 (PC) at 580–581 per Lord Wilberforce. 13 Above n 7, at [101]–[102]. 14 At [109]–[110]. 15 At [123], [132]–[133] and [136]. 6 … [Company A] clearly had actual knowledge of the covenant and of the problems with it before it took title to the land in May 2012. It has endeavoured to take advantage of the problems wi...

9. LCRO 57/2018 G RC and D RC v YS (30 April 2019) [pdf, 335 KB]

   ...application to the Family Court. (ii) Mr YS 35 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules, r 8.1. 36 Rule 8.1.1 37 Rules 8.2(b), 8.3. 38 Rules 8.4(c), 8.5, 8.6. 19 [110] Mr YS distinguishes his correspondence with Mr G’s lawyer which is not confidential information, from information about Mrs RC, and her “family situation” which is confidential. He says information provided by Ms MF, Ms KN, a...

10. LCRO 98/2018 and 201/2018 HK v CN (22 May 2019) [pdf, 238 KB]

    ...firm’s employees. He says this takes the form of “random checks” of files being worked on by employees, and of any “specific issues” brought to their attention. He says he and Mr AN can be “approached” by employees at any time. [110] He says the firm provides a process sheet as a guide to assist new employees who carry out legal work. He says their work is reviewed “every two days”. [111] In response to my request at the hearing, Mr SO explains that before com...