Search Results

1. 2017 NZSSAA 062 (20 October 2017) [pdf, 307 KB]

   ...Department. [109] If Mr Reid had no authority to suspend Ms XXXX’s support and establish a debt, he inflicted the taint of predetermination on the Chief Executive’s delegates who did have the authority to make those statutory decisions. [110] The reality is that Mr Reid either lacked the skills to conduct his interview with Ms XXXX, or chose not to conduct it properly. The evidential value of the interview was severely compromised by his conduct. Had it been reviewed by an app...

2. Rolleston v Moore - Lot 1 Deposited Plan South Auckland 52401 and Ongaonga No 1C No 1 Block (2016) 133 Waikato Maniapoto MB 39 (133 WMN 39) [pdf, 297 KB]

   133 Waikato Maniapoto MB 39 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIKATO MANIAPOTO DISTRICT A20160002444 UNDER Section 26 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF LOT 1 DEPOSITED PLAN SOUTH AUCKLAND 52401 AND ONGAONGA NO 1C NO 1 BLOCK BETWEEN ANDREW MARC ROLLESTON Applicant AND ELLA MOORE AND WALTER MOORE Respondents AND THE TRUSTEES OF THE ONGAONGA 1C1 TRUST Interested Party Hearing: 2 May 2016 (120 W

3. LCRO 136/2016 AB v DE and GH [pdf, 483 KB]

   LCRO 136/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee BETWEEN AB Applicant AND DE and GH Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed DECISION Introduction [1] Ms AB has applied for a review of a decision by the [City] Standards Committee to take no furthe

4. TC vs Mr & Mrs SH LCRO 234/2014 [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...at the initiative of Mr G. There is simply no independent evidence of this, as, for example, the assessor provided in relation to the work carried out by Mr TC. 22 Above n 5 at [15]. 20 [110] However, the fact that his work was competent and met the clients’ needs does not answer the question of whether Mr TC exceeded the scope of his instructions. [111] I consider that this question is best answered by a consideration of the...

5. BG v HL LCRO 71/2013 [pdf, 221 KB]

   ...in the knowledge that the information was to serve as an aide memoir for Mrs BG, presents as markedly at odds with Ms HL’s stated position that she was vehemently opposed to meeting with Mrs BG and acutely mindful of the risks of doing so. [110] The statement when examined, may present as Ms HL describes it, as no more than an attempt by Mrs BG to clarify what had occurred in the course of the domestic incident, but viewed objectively there are elements of the statement that 2...

6. Williams v Trustees of Parahirahi C1 (2005) 37 Kaikohe MB 212 (37 KH 212) [pdf, 6.5 MB]

   ...unauthorised trust expenditure. [47] In response submissions filed in July 2004, Ms Mary Wihongi provided equally detailed evidence responding to the fresh queries conceming petrol vouchers, gate takings and the TPK payment (noting that there was 110 discrepancy but rather a deduction for GST), and explaining the reason for the' altered document. [48] Thereafter, further evidence ii-om Dora Stevenson, James Rapatini and Erana Brown refuting claims made that they received petrol...

7. Thomson - Part Tahorakuri A1 Sec1 Māori Reservation (2002) 76 Taupō MB 98 (76 TPO 98) [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...reement was reached between the said Contact Energy Ltd in respect of the adjoining areas the subject matter of usage or other forms of easement for the Ohaaki geo thermal power station but Contact Energy Ltd has made no effort Minute Book: 76 TPO 110 to comply with its lawful requirements in reaching agreement with the trustees for the Maori Reservation on any of the above matters. The reservation trustee is a stand alone Trust and not tied in with what is known as the Ngati Tahu Tri...

8. LCRO 75/2016 XN and WN v VO (25 February 2019) [pdf, 242 KB]

   ...easement”. He says as “a plaintiff or party to the litigation” he and Mrs VO were “independently represented”. 10 IJ v QT LCRO 94/2011 (18 January 2012) at [32]. 11 Morpeth v Ramsey LCRO 110/2009 (12 November 2009) at [20]. 12 At [27]. — citing Longstaff v Birtles [2001] EWCA Civ 1219, [2002] 1 WLR 470 at 471 per Mummery LJ. 12 [67] He contends that because the definition of “legal services” in s 6 of the Act “m...

9. LL v Sun [2019] NZIACDT 3 (30 January 2019) [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...February 2014. He appears to have passed it onto the company’s staff without comment. Indeed, he says he had 20 nothing to do with compiling the complainant’s statement of 3 March 2014 sent in response to Immigration New Zealand. [110] As was the case for the earlier period, Mr Sun’s arrangement with the company means he was not acting in accordance with the Act or the 2014 Code from 13 January 2014, as his conduct enabled the company’s staff to provide unlicensed imm...

10. MZ v Sun [2019] NZIACDT 12 (4 March 2019) [pdf, 261 KB]

    ...staff. The company could not have held itself out as facilitating New Zealand immigration without the use of his license. This was a breach of cl 3(c) of the 2014 Code to conduct himself in accordance with New Zealand immigration legislation. [110] I uphold the third head of complaint. Mr Sun allowed the company’s staff to interview the complainant, take his instructions, complete the application and other forms, complete the business plan and generally give him assistance on i...