Search Results

1. 2021-10-22 ORC PC7 - [2021] NZEnvC 164 - Interim Decision [pdf, 1 MB]

   OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL – PLAN CHANGE 7 – INTERIM DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 164 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7: Water for Otago (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under s 142(2)(b) of the Act) BETWEEN OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2020-CHC-127)

2. 2013 Justice Sector report [pdf, 12 MB]

   Public trust in our institutions and the law is essential to making society work effectively. We want a justice system that delivers the core results of reduced crime and improved safety, and that better meets modern public expectations of service. We also want to be transparent about what we are doing and what's being achieved. That's why this document has been created. This report is not required by any statute, but as a sector we are accountable to New Zealanders

3. Regulatory Impact Statement Parliamentary privilege bill [pdf, 302 KB]

   1 Regulatory Impact Statement  Parliamentary Privilege Bill  Agency Disclosure Statement  1. This Regulatory Impact Statement has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice.  It analyses options  for  addressing  some  concerns  about  parliamentary  privilege  raised  by  Parliament’s  Privileges  Committee  (Question  of  privilege  concerning  the  defamation  action Attorney‐General  and Gow  v  Leigh, June 2013).  2. O

4. Regulatory Impact Statement Vulnerable childrens bill child harm prevention orders [pdf, 234 KB]

   1 Regulatory Impact Statement Vulnerable Children's Bill -Child Harm Prevention Orders Agency disclosure statement This Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) was prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides an analysis of options to address concerns around people who have been: • convicted of, or found on the balance of probabilities (more likely than not) to have committed, a specified offence, against a child or children; and • who pose a high risk

5. [2007] NZEmpC CC 5/07 Reynolds v Burgess [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...was appropriate. In my view, that award was inadequate to properly compensate Ms Burgess in all the circumstances of this case. Accordingly, I set aside the determination of the Authority in this respect and award instead the sum of $4,000. [110] By way of cross-challenge, Ms Burgess sought an award of interest on the remedies awarded by the Authority from 22 March 2002 down to the date of judgment. The Court’s jurisdiction to award interest is conferred by clause 14 of Sched...

6. [2007] NZEmpC AC 13/07 Red Beach School Board of Trustees & Ors v New Zealand Education Institute (Inc) [pdf, 135 KB]

   RED BEACH SCHOOL BOT & ANOR V NZEI (INC) AK AC 13/07 20 March 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND AC 13/07 ARC 115/05 IN THE MATTER OF de novo challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN THE RED BEACH SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES First Plaintiff AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL IN RESPECT OF THE SECRETARY FOR EDUCATION Second Plaintiff AND THE NEW ZEALAND EDUCATION INSTITUTE (INC) Defendant Hearing: 26, 27 and 29 J

7. [2011] NZEmpC 152 Blackmore v Honick Properties Ltd [pdf, 178 KB]

   RICKY BLACKMORE V HONICK PROPERTIES LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2011] NZEmpC 152 [24 November 2011] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2011] NZEmpC 152 ARC 37/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN RICKY BLACKMORE Plaintiff AND HONICK PROPERTIES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 25 October 2011 (Heard at Hamilton) and by memoranda of submissions filed on 3 and 10 November 2011 Appearances: Gregor

8. [2006] NZEmpC WC 10/06 Timmins v Asure New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 121 KB]

   TIMMINS V ASURE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED WN WC 10/06 29 June 2006 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 10/06 WRC 16/05 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BENJAMIN HARRY TIMMINS Plaintiff AND ASURE NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 December 2005 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: G A Paine and A Davison, Counsel for the Plaintiff J M Appleyard and V E Donaghy, Counsel for the Defendan

9. [2015] NZEmpC 138 NZ Meat Workers Union Inc v South Pacific Meats Ltd and Talley [pdf, 415 KB]

   ...one is bound to criminate himself,' in the sense that he is not to be compelled to say anything which 'may tend to bring him into the peril and possibility of being convicted as a criminal': per Field J in Lamb v Munster 10 QBD 110, 111" (ibid, 403). See also Blunt v Park Land Hotel Ltd [1942] 2 KB 253. The rule extends to discovery (Triplex Safety Glass v Lancegaye Safety Glass) and to interrogatories (Taranaki Co-operative Dairy Co Ltd v Rowe [1970] NZLR 89...

10. Putataua Bay Holdings Limited v Pere - Roadway Order Instrument 7895326.1 (2015) 105 Taitokerau MB 103 (105 TTK 103) [pdf, 282 KB]

    ...incidents. In addition, according to the evidence of Dover Samuels, other users of the road have been abused by Mr Pere and told not to use the roadway. The applications [23] PBH filed two applications dated 25 June 2014. 105 Taitokerau MB 110 [24] First, PBH applied under s 19 of the Act for an urgent injunction prohibiting Mr Pere from blocking or otherwise preventing access over the 2008 roadway and, second, for an injunction ordering the removal of any dwelling or o...