3132 items matching your search terms
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2018] NZIACDT 6 Reference No: IACDT 004/17 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Darren Calder (Immigration New Zealand) Complainant AND Gaurav Soni Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms F Moha
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 27 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act BETWEEN KUMEU PROPERTY LIMITED (ENV-2017-AKL-44) Appellant AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge JA Smith Environment Commissioner SK Prime Hearing: Auckland, 12-16 February 2018, site visit 21 February Appearances: RE Bartlett QC for Kumeu Property Limited (the Appl
...(20 January 1993) does deal with work incapacity. He rated Mr Jones as having a “mild impairment” in the work place and appears to attribute this largely to the 1988 misadventure (see report set out in 13 October 1997 review decision). [110] Dr Blue (8 March 1993, 2 April 1993) was satisfied Mr Jones left his employment at Kelly Tarltons due to psychological problems relating to the 1988 accident and that those problems persisted, preventing him from working (8 March 1993 r...
ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY NEW ZEALAND [2015] NZACA 14 ACA 12/2008 Bryce Malcolm McDonald Appellant Accident Compensation Corporation Respondent Before: D J Plunkett Counsel for the Appellant: J Miller Counsel for the Respondent: P McBride Date of Hearing: 6 October 2015 Date of Decision: 16 December 2015 __________________________________________________________________ DECISION _______________________________
BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY AT WELLINGTON [2013] NZACA 11 ACA 10/12 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s 107 of the Act BETWEEN STEPHEN MCLENACHAN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent HEARING: at Wellington on 2 May 2013 AUTHORITY: Robyn Bedford COUNSEL: S McLenachan, appellant P McBride for respondent
THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2014-100-000026 [2016] NZWHT AUCKLAND 2 BETWEEN BU-RYE & JEOM-YOUL LEE Claimants AND AUCKLAND COUNCIL First Respondent AND GIL (2008) LIMITED (formerly Goodland Investments Limited) Second Respondent AND LAI FOOK CHOY (Not Served) Third Respondent Hearing: 28, 29, 30 October 2015 Closing submissions: 25 November 2015 Appearances: Ms Grant for the claimants Ms Knight and Mr Fellows for th
...required by the Code (clause 1.5 – communication of all significant matters; clause 1.1 – not informing his client of material matters, so lacking informed instructions; clause 9 – not providing a copy of the internal complaints procedure). [110] I cannot be satisfied of the extent to which Ms Gu-Chang undertook any of the preliminary steps of establishing a professional relationship. Regardless, as she was not licensed at the time, it would have been unprofessional conduct pursua...
...payment as ordered by Judge Strettell, I consider that the recommendations made by Mr SF were logical and, the terms of the consent memorandum did not include terms that would not have been agreed to by a reasonably competent lawyer. 17 [110] It is somewhat difficult to accept that the terms of the memorandum were responsible for the loss that Mr IR has suffered. It seems to me that the losses have been caused by the fact that he defaulted in payment of the TSB loan and it...
1 (1) ORDER THAT PARAGRAPHS [27] AND [85] TO [87] NOT BE PUBLISHED TO ANY PERSONS OTHER THAN THE PARTIES IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2017] NZHRRT 4 Reference No. HRRT 035/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN DEBORAH WAXMAN PLAINTIFF AND JITENDRA PAL DEFENDANT AT AUCKLAND BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines QC, Chairperson Ms LJ Alaeinia, Member Mr BK Neeson JP, Member REPRESENTATION: Dr D Waxman in person Dr
LCRO 166/2012 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area]Standards Committee BETWEEN QW Applicant AND RH Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mr QW has applied for a review of a decision by the [Area] Standards Committee to take no further acti