Search Results

1. Jace Investments Limited and Anor v CAC304 & Anor [2015] NZREADT 86 [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2008/0066/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM1152074#DLM1152074 4 [17] Should the Authority succeed in prosecuting Charge 1 before us against the licensee then, as we have explained above, we are given various powers to make orders in terms of s 110 of the Act. In that case, in the usual way we would consider the issue of costs although, under s 93(1)(i), that would only be in terms of whether the licensee be ordered to pay costs to a complainant and...

2. Steedman v Steedman – Owhaoko D6 Section 3 (2012) 20 Takitimu MB 230 (20 TKT 230) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...beneficiaries by a significant margin support the application. Counsel noted that the whole issue of the utilisation and development of the land had been discussed with the beneficiaries 1 41 Wanganui MB 110 (41 WG MB 110) 2 55 Aotea MB 97-101 (55 AOT MB 97-101) 3 Ibid 4 119 Aotea MB 69 (119 AOT MB 69) 20 Takitimu MB 232 [9] of the trust for some time and that reluctantly the trustees considered that eventual sale...

3. Acoustic – Supplementary (dated 13 June 2017) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...regression lines. When assessing effects, reference should be made to the distribution of levels at different wind speeds. 7. We agree that background sound levels have been measured at the three nearest neighbours (22 Pryde Rd, 90 Pryde Rd and 110 Porteous Rd). These measured background sound levels are shown in the graphs on pages SSGC-014 to 016 of the supplementary evidence of Dr Chiles. Summary values from these graphs at particular wind speeds are set out in the table below....

4. [2020] NZSSAA 16 (30 July 2020) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...informed of the Benefits Review Committee decision when it was issued, and there has been a lapse of some three and a half years since the time expired for her appeal. [4.2] The decision XXXX claims is inconsistent is SSAA Appeal [2016] NZSSAA 110. [4.3] The Ministry addressed s 70 (of the Social Security Act 1964 that applied at the time) in its report to the Benefits Review Committee, noted it allowed a discretion to delay making deductions from New Zealand Superannuation wh...

5. People discharged without conviction December 2017 [xlsx, 293 KB]

   ...offences 85 101 83 69 63 59 74 71 72 67 10: Illicit drug offences 163 178 153 128 135 105 94 103 91 122 11: Prohibited and regulated weapons and explosives offences 112 79 75 82 66 56 45 61 57 40 12: Property damage and environmental pollution 279 265 225 204 159 143 110 141 105 116 13: Public order offences 710 665 450 216 139 106 68 57 58 68 14: Traffic and vehicle regulatory offences 422 424 352 340 400 307 347 348 339 296 15: Offences against justice procedures, government security an...

6. LCRO 141/2013 TM v DC (7 June 2017) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...he was aware of Mr DC’s involvement in the [service] sector from the outset and that in fact was one of the reasons he chose to instruct him”.7 [24] With regard to the deduction of fees, the Committee noted and set out the provisions of s 110(1)(b) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 (the Act) and regs 9, 9.3 and 10 of the Trust Account Regulations.8 These are not set out in this decision as they are included in full in the Standards Committee determination. [25] The C...

7. [2020] NZEmpC 110 Cowan v Kidd [pdf, 327 KB]

   GEORGE COWAN v CHARLES KIDD IN PARTNERSHIP WITH GEOFFREY KIDD, TRADING AS KIDD PARTNERSHIP [2020] NZEmpC 110 [28 July 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 110 EMPC 139/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN GEORGE COWAN Plaintiff AND CHARLES KIDD IN PARTNERSHIP WITH GEOFFREY KIDD, TRADING AS...

8. People charged and convicted of methamphetamine offences December 2022 [xlsx, 211 KB]

   ...proved 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 4 0 2 Taitokerau Whangārei Not proved 5 15 20 26 26 21 33 15 17 13 Taitokerau Whangārei Other 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 Taitokerau Whangārei Total 40 60 63 103 98 113 123 138 100 75 Taitokerau Justice service area total Convicted 46 77 67 110 100 137 148 182 116 103 Taitokerau Justice service area total Other proved 2 0 0 5 2 4 3 6 0 3 Taitokerau Justice service area total Not proved 15 18 37 40 33 31 45 23 27 26 Taitokerau Justice service area total Other 1 0 0 1 0 0 0...

9. LCRO 175/2022 OP v VN (10 October 2023) [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...VN. The Committee made three requests and issued two production orders over a ten-month period. Mr VN was dilatory and uncooperative, if not obstructive. 1 Mr OP subsequently stated that there had been no proceedings in 2015. 2 At [132]. 3 At [110]–[111]. 9 [36] As a result, the Committee both expanded and again recast the issues it was considering or reconsidering, as follows: (a) whether Mr VN received the sum of $3,000 from Mr OP and, if so, whether Mr VN properly dealt...

10. [2013] NZEmpC 94 Fifield v Rotorua City Council [pdf, 69 KB]

    ...also of prejudicing his case. In these circumstances I adjourned the hearing and arranged for the appointment of counsel (an amica curiae or friend of the Court) to make 1 [2012] NZERA Auckland 110. submissions in an attempt to ensure that the merits of Mr Fifield’s case were put before the Court. [3] I am grateful to Ms Dew for having undertaken this task at the request of the Court and am satisfied, having heard from...