3133 items matching your search terms
CLAIM NO: 3368 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER OF an adjudication BETWEEN Carole Ann Abraham and Mary Helen Webb Claimants AND Auckland City Council First Respondent AND Peter Raymond Hinton Second Respondent AND Geoffrey Joyce (now struck out) Third Respondent AND Steven Clement Miller Fourth Respondent AND Derek Lloyd Divers Fifth Respondent Hearing: 21 August 2007 Appearances: Ms M
[2013] NZACA 1 ACA 02/11 IN THE MATTER of the Accident Compensation Act 1982 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal pursuant to s.107 of the Act BETWEEN JAMES ALGIE AND ORS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION a body corporate duly constituted under the provisions of the said Act Respondent BEFORE THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION APPEAL AUTHORITY R Bedford HEARING at Wellington on 7 & 9 November 2012 APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Mr
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2016] NZIACDT27 Reference No: IACDT 036/15 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY The Registrar of Immigration Advisers Registrar BETWEEN Edwin Balatbat Complainant AND Lindsay Charles Sparks Adviser DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Ms G Kelly, lawyer, MBIE,
HALLAM NGARUPA KUPA v SILVER FERN FARMS BEEF LIMITED NZEmpC WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 87 [7 July 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2016] NZEmpC 87 EMPC 79/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN HALLAM NGARUPA KUPA Plaintiff AND SILVER FERN FARMS BEEF LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 13, 14 and 15 June 2016 Appearances: S Mitchell, counsel for the plaintiff T
FREDRICK PRETORIUS v MARRA CONSTRUCTION (2004) LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 95 [2 August 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 95 EMPC 323/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN FREDRICK PRETORIUS Plaintiff AND MARRA CONSTRUCTION (2004) LIMITED Defendant EMPC 376/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Rela
LCRO 259/2012 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [North Island] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN JE Applicant AND AC AND SY Respondents The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Mrs JE applied for a review of a decision by the [North Island] Standards Com
...fees charged by licensed immigration advisers was collated from a voluntary form completed on the renewal of licences. The Authority recognised that fees vary depending on circumstances in individual cases. Mr Loh and Ms Gu-Chang’s response [110] Mr Loh and Ms Gu-Chang responded to the respective complaints against them jointly, through their counsel Mr Laurent. [111] Mr Laurent produced: [111.1] A memorandum (with attachments). [111.2] An affidavit of Mr D J Ryken, a lawyer ex...
...application other than under section 35A, and advised her to leave New Zealand. [109] It was not necessary for Ms Tan to refer to section 35A in her letter of 24 August 2009, as Immigration New Zealand would consider the section without reference to it. [110] Immigration New Zealand’s letter of 15 October 2009 was issued without the “potentially prejudicial information” being put. Ms Tan claims that was not correct practice, despite the application being considered under s.35A....
...opportunities, and that contrasted with the favourable reports that Mr Wiezoreck initially received from Oceania; ultimately, employment was an essential ingredient in Mr Wiezoreck’s immigration opportunities. 15 Discussion Preliminary [110] Mr Wiezoreck’s concern that Oceania should be the subject of his complaint is understandable. However, the limits of the Tribunal’s jurisdiction are clear; it can only deal with complaints against licensed immigration advise...
BARBARA TWENTYMAN v THE WAREHOUSE LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 172 [20 December 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2016] NZEmpC 172 EMPC 55/2015 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BARBARA TWENTYMAN Plaintiff AND THE WAREHOUSE LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 27, 28, 29 and 30 June 2016 (heard in Rotorua) Appearances: Plaintiff in person P Swarbrick a