BGH v Kumar [2024] NZHRRT 2 [pdf, 292 KB]
...behaviour was also discussed in her [readacted]’s evidence. It is accepted that the behaviour prior to the two November incidents and the office and peeping incidents themselves were all unwelcome and offensive to BGH. 16 DML, above n 8, at [110]. 17 Most notably Craig, above n 9, at [405]. 18 Craig, above n 9, at [405]. 15 WAS THE BEHAVIOUR REPEATED OR OF SUCH A SIGNIFICANT NATURE THAT IT HAD A DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON BGH? [62] Section 62(2) requires that the beha...