LCRO 162/2018 BQ v XR (29 September 2020) [pdf, 267 KB]
...argument would reduce to the untenable proposition that Mr XR was required to follow Mr BQ’s advice to attempt settlement at the earliest possible opportunity, and any failure to do so rendered Mr XR responsible for incurring further costs. [110] Whilst it approaches the trite to observe that costs will increase the longer a matter remains unresolved, Mr BQ’s criticism of Mr XR that he was resistant to accepting sound advice is not convincing. [111] There is no indication of M...