3132 items matching your search terms
LCRO 69/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [City] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN PR Applicant AND HG Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms PR has applied for a review of a decision by the [City] Standards Committee [X] which determined
Armed Forces Law Reform Bill 23 February 2007 Attorney-General LEGAL ADVICE CONSISTENCY WITH THE NEW ZEALAND BILL OF RIGHTS ACT 1990: ARMED FORCES LAW REFORM BILL 1. Further to our letter of 13 February 2007, indicating that no provision in the Armed Forces Law Reform Bill (PCO 6759/13) (the "Bill") appeared to be inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the "Bill of Rights Act"), we now provide detailed advice on a number of proposals in the
...(section 59(1)). Once his condition stabilises, an assessment of permanent incapacity is made. He would then need to establish that he was a person who “does not completely recover from his incapacity due to the accident” (section 60(1)). [110] Counsel are agreed that the causative threshold is “of some substance” or “substantial”. The 1984 medical misadventure need not be the sole cause of incapacity, but it must be an operating (contributing) cause of some substan...
CLAIM NO: 376 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN JANICE LORRAINE and NOEL EWART HILL Claimants AND DIANNE and ROSS WHIMP First Respondents AND AKITA CONSTRUCTION LTD Second Respondent AND EUROBRIK PRODUCTS LTD Third Respondent AND No Fourth Respondent, Jeff Young Contractors Ltd having been struck out AND No Fifth Respondent, David John Follas having been struck out AND No Sixth Respon
...that that it was a pity that the Corporation could not run its own clinics and employ its own psychiatrists and handle these issues directly, however, this would appear to be the most benign of the views expressed in his supplementary report. [110] Dr Gluckman’s reports started a chain of events that culminated in the appellant’s compensation being ceased, during which the reports were published to, or discussed with, all of his treating medical practitioners, without his consent, o...
E.64 SOI (2015) Statement of intent 2015–2019 Ministry of Justice DRAFT 2 DRAFT 3 Contents Introduction from the Minister of Justice .................................................................................................. 4 Introduction from the Chief Executive ...................................................................................................... 6 Our story...............................................................
CATHERINE STORMONT v PEDDLE THORP AITKEN LIMITED NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 71 [6 June 2017] ATTENTION IS DRAWN TO THE NON-PUBLICATION ORDERS REFERRED TO AT [129] OF THIS JUDGMENT IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 71 EMPC 48/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CATHERINE STORMONT Plaintiff AND PEDDLE THORP AITKEN LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 18-26 Octo
...separation order, suggesting that it was a ruse to obtain an occupation order of the family home. [109] Eventually that issue was overcome, but there followed a brief but inevitable delay when Dr JI terminated his retainer with his lawyer. [110] As well, because the application for a separation order was filed on notice (as it had to be), the Family Courts Rules 2002 prescribed time limits for steps to be taken by Dr JI, before the matter could be considered substantively. Those...
BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Hearing: Appearances: Date of Decision: Date of Issue: IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 13 3 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an appeal pursuant to Clause 14 of the First Schedule to the Act DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION (ENV-2016-AKL-000149) Appellant THAMES-COROMANDEL DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Principal Environment Judge LJ Newhook Environment Comm
NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZLCDT 41 LCDT 010/10, 008/12 and 014/15 IN THE MATTER OF The Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 and the Law Practitioners Act 1982 BETWEEN NATIONAL STANDARDS COMMITTEE No. 1 AND THE AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE No. 1 Applicant AND FRANCISC CATALIN DELIU of Auckland, Lawyer CHAIR Ms M Scholtens QC MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Ms S Hughes QC Ms J Gray Mr W Smith