Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 223 MacFarlane Investments Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 490 KB]

   ...engagement to undertake the design of the Man Street/Brecon Street intersection, noting that the preferred design required land to be acquired from the objector believed at that time to be 29 35.5 m², but was later discovered to be smaller. [110] However, knowing that this was going to be an important intersection for the arterial road, Beca had been requested to bring forward design work with the intersection requirements which resulted in additional land requirement-initially...

2. Auckland Standards Committee 3 v Park [2023] NZLCDT 51 (20 November 2023) [pdf, 327 KB]

   THE NAMES OF THE COMPLAINANT AND HER SISTER, THE FAMILY NAME OF THE CLIENT, MR PARK’S FORMER EMPLOYER AND FIRM NAME, MR PARK’S FELLOW EMPLOYEE WHO ATTENDED THE 22 JUNE MEETING, AND THE NAME OF THE LAWYER WHO PROVIDED AN OPINION OF THE WILL FOR MR PARK’S FIRM SHALL NOT BE PUBLISHED. THESE ORDERS MADE PURSUANT TO S 240 LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS ACT 2006. NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2023] NZLCDT 51 LCDT 006/23 IN THE MATTER of t

3. LCRO 201/2021 DK obo The LK Estate v BY and FM (31 July 2023) [pdf, 305 KB]

   ...underlying condition of lack of capacity. Such allegations would normally imply undue influence on, or an overbearing of, acts of will on Mrs LK’s part, not an absence of will. A lack of capacity would normally be argued in the alternative. [110] I observe also that if Mrs LK’s capacity in April 2015 had been a material issue in the High Court proceedings, it is likely if not certain that Ms FM would have been asked or subpoenaed to give evidence about it. There is no suggestion...

4. 05-Stormwater-Drainage_Part2.pdf [pdf, 16 MB]

   ...INLET/OUTLET 36.6 CCVT1 SWALE TO SWALE CULVERT WITH ID POSSIBLE PROPERTY ACCESS ROUTE WETLAND SWALE SH1 40. 0 40.0 45. 0 45.0 50.0 50.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 65.0 70.0 75.0 80.0 85.0 90.0 95.0 100.0 105.030900 31000 31100 31200 31300 31400 31500 31600 JO IN S SH EE T 32 JO IN S SH EE T 30 12 11 13 13.rd 12.sd 128 106a 106 SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW SW Rev. SURVEYED DRAWN DESIGNED DESIGN CHECK APPROVED CAD REVIEW Drawing N...

5. OIA-111025.pdf [pdf, 11 MB]

   Justice Centre | 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 | Wellington T 04 918 8800 | F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz 29 April 2024 Our ref: OIA 111025 Tēnā koe Official Information Act request: Health, Safety and Wellbeing documents Thank you for your email of 30 March 2024, requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act), information regarding the Ministry of Justice’s (the Ministry) health, safety and wellbeing st

6. LCRO 097/2023 RQ and EP v OM (14 February 2024) [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...said for the respondent’s conduct towards the applicants’ lawyer. The exchange of correspondence recorded in paragraphs [14] to [16] above prompted the comment by the Judge at paragraph [46] of her decision quoted at paragraph [27] above. [110] In my view, the Judge exercised considerable restraint in her phraseology but still made clear that she considered that the respondent shared personal responsibility for the vexatiousness of the protection order application. [111] The respo...

7. Rankin v Accident Compensation Corporation (Revocation of Cover Mental Injury) [2023] NZACC 96 [pdf, 389 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 96 ACR 009/20 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN MELISSA RANKIN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 12 and 13 June 2023 Held at: Hamilton/Kirikirioa Appearances: Ms K Koloni for the Appellant S Churstain for the Respondent Judgment:

8. [2024] NZEmpC 84 E Tū Inc v Singh [pdf, 378 KB]

   E TŪ INCORPORATED v SHER SINGH [2024] NZEmpC 84 [21 May 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 84 EMPC 275/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN E TŪ INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND SHER SINGH Defendant EMPC 286/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authorit

9. [2024] NZIACDT 17 – LB v Luv (23 May 2024) [pdf, 298 KB]

   IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2024] NZIACDT 17 Reference No: IACDT 007/23 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 BY THE REGISTRAR OF IMMIGRATION ADVISERS Registrar BETWEEN LB Complainant AND KAY LUV Adviser Hearing at Auckland on 7 May 2024 SUBJECT TO SUPPRESSION ORDER DECISION Dated 23 May 2024 REPR

10. [2023] NZEnvC 186 Lund v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

    ...consequential amendment to the inclusion of new Policy 15.2.4. The version proposed by the Council, which follows the wording of its version of new Policy 15.2.4.9, is also favoured by the court. Provision for an increase in floor area of new buildings [110] An amendment is sought to existing Rule 15.3.4 to allow an increase in buildings by 15% as a permitted activity. [111] The Council opposes this in favour of restricted discretionary activity status. The Council considers tha...