Search Results

1. Regulatory impact statement: Review of family violence legislation [pdf, 300 KB]

   1 Review of family violence legislation: Regulatory impact statement Agency Disclosure Statement 1. This Regulatory impact statement (RIS) has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice. It provides an analysis of options for strengthening legislation to better respond to family violence in New Zealand. Key constraints are set out below. 2. Focus on regulatory change: The scope of the review is strengthening family violence legislation. Overall, this restricted the consideration

2. The Māori Trustee v Smith - Waipaoa 5A2 (2016) 62 Tairawhiti MB 122 (62 TRW 122) [pdf, 471 KB]

   62 Tairawhiti MB 122 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND TAIRĀWHITI DISTRICT A20150003384 UNDER Sections 19(1)(a) and 20 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Waipaoa 5A2 – Injunction and Recovery of Māori Freehold Land BETWEEN THE MĀORI TRUSTEE Applicant AND BRUCE WINSTON ANDERSON SMITH Respondent A20140012500 A20150003329 A20150003333 UNDER Sections 240 and 43 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MA

3. Mills v Capital and Coast District Health Board [2019] NZHRRT 47 [PDF, 731 KB]

   (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME OF WITNESS (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE TRIBUNAL OR OF THE CHAIRPERSON Reference No. HRRT 012/2019 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 1993 BETWEEN RICHARD EDWARD MILLS PLAINTIFF AND CAPITAL AND COAST DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD FIRST DEFENDANT AND HUTT DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD SECOND DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Deputy Chairperson Mr MJM K

4. LCRO 158/2018 YCH v TSR (30 September 2020) [pdf, 396 KB]

   ...of his first letter to the beneficiaries, until 27 November 2013 when he informed them for the first time to obtain their “own advice” if they could not agree how to administer Mr ASR’s estate. (2) For whom was Mr YCH permitted to act? [110] This leads to the next question whether Mr YCH was permitted to advise the beneficiaries during that period? (a) Parties’ positions [111] Ms TSR claims, by not giving effect to Mr ASR’s wishes, Mr YCH failed in his “fiduciary du...

5. [2019] NZEnvC 150 Arthurs Point Outstanding Natural Landscape Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 12 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2019) NZEnvC 150 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of an application for enforcement order under section 316 of the Act ARTHURS POINT OUTSTANDING NATURAL LANDSCAPE SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2019-CHC-102) Applicant QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge J R Jackson (sitting alone under section 309(1) of the Act) Hearing: at

6. [2020] NZEmpC 63 Southern Taxis Ltd v A Labour Inspector [pdf, 518 KB]

   SOUTHERN TAXIS LIMITED v A LABOUR INSPECTOR [2020] NZEmpC 63 [14 May 2020 ] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 63 EMPC 249/2018 EMPC 187/2019 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN SOUTHERN TAXIS LIMITED First Plaintiff AND MAUREEN VALERIE GRANT Second Plaintiff AND RONALD JAMES GRANT

7. LCRO 119/2016 XY, ZW, QM, and ABC Lawyers v TQ (16 November 2018) [pdf, 466 KB]

   LCRO 119/2016 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN XY, ZW, QM, and ABC LAWYERS Applicants AND TQ Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. 2 Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................

8. 10.-Justine-Quinn-Freshwater-Ecology.pdf [pdf, 3.9 MB]

   Barristers and Solicitors Wellington Solicitors Acting: David Randal / Thaddeus Ryan / Frances Wedde Email: david.randal@buddlefindlay.com Tel 64-4-499 4242 Fax 64-4-499 4141 PO Box 2694 DX SP20201 Wellington 6140 IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-Ā-TARA ROHE ENV-2020-WLG-00014 UNDER the Resource Management Act 1991 IN THE MATTER OF a notice of motion under section 87G of the Act

9. Dr Phil Ross - Evidence in Chief [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...~al11.a11e; . No ,cllsper!.a l,clui! r.o ml11;i~e; Dlspfrrsai:byw~ve action Uttllbl•t; . Dlsp~rsalbywave action unll 11,~ly: focallscd1ccdc,nlc.lo1:lfocts; ·• localised ecc,lc;r,lc;i I ,!:ffEi~ts. Monltorlni, forCu d,011.~ lt1 next 20 •1.rs . t,fo J110n,ltorln~;. ~emo11al. wl1~.re po:!slble h1 tH,~t 20,1.rs ' No remC\la[ conllng.etK\' VBT alr,,acl1,' r,frleased'from the 1/Jmih . iBT ;,lr.-.d•rr,le~s~d1 fromth,e wr,,d; lf~,1ratles O'IJlr time~ dt6r~•do....

10. [2019] NZEmpC 151 Zhang v Telco Asset Management Ltd [pdf, 537 KB]

    YAN ZHANG v TELCO ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED [2019] NZEmpC 151 [23 October 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2019] NZEmpC 151 EMPC 58/2019 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN YAN ZHANG Plaintiff AND TELCO ASSET MANAGEMENT LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 3, 4 and 5 September 2019 (heard