Search Results

1. 29.-Evidence-of-Ms-Ainsley-McLeod-Conditions.pdf [pdf, 563 KB]

   Barristers and Solicitors Wellington Solicitor Acting: David Allen / Thaddeus Ryan Email: david.allen@buddlefindlay.com / thaddeus.ryan@buddlefindlay.com Tel 64 4 044 620450 Fax 64 4 499 4141 PO Box 2694 DX SP20201 Wellington 6011 ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ENV-2023-WLG-000005 Under the Resource Management Act 1991 In the matter of the direct referral of applications for res

2. [2024] NZEnvC 183 Grenadier Ltd v Manawatu-Whanganui Regional Council [pdf, 402 KB]

   GRENADIER LIMITED v MANAWATŪ-WHANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA Decision No. [2024] NZEnvC 183 IN THE MATTER of an appeal under s 120 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN GRENADIER LIMITED (ENV-2022-WLG-24) Appellant AND MANAWATŪ-WHANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge L J Semple Environment Judge S M Tepania Environment Commissioner R M Bartlett

3. [2024] NZEmpC 133 Gumbeze v The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki – Ministry for Children [pdf, 422 KB]

   BIGSON GUMBEZE v THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF ORANGA TAMARIKI – MINISTRY FOR CHILDREN [2024] NZEmpC 133 [24 July 2024] ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION NAMES OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF NAMES AND IDENTIFYING DETAILS AS AT [10] OF THIS JUDGMENT IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 133 EMPC 256/2022 EMPC 425/2022 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to two determinations of the Employmen

4. Drozdzak v Accident Compensation Corporation (Work related gradual process) [2023] NZACC 157 [pdf, 442 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 157 ACR 306/19 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT BETWEEN ANTHONY DROZDZAK Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 17 July 2023 Heard at: Dunedin / Otepoti Appearances: Mr P Schmidt for the Appellant Ms A Douglass and Ms Gaskell for the Respo

5. Emtage v Accident Compensation Corporation (Revocation of Cover) [2023] NZACC 84 [pdf, 522 KB]

   ...significant that no physician disputed the mechanism of injury; that all the physicians who engaged with Nicola personally observed pain in the leg, but only Dr Bentley tested for an objectively attributed source of the pain, primarily to the leg. [110] Mr O’Sullivan submits there is no time bar on presenting evidence of causation of injury. [111] He says that ultimately the ultrasound tests put the focus squarely on muscle injury and he says there was evidence of that throug...

6. LCRO 155/2023 DU v KQ (8 April 2025) [pdf, 358 KB]

   ...respond in a less considered manner than was typically his practice. [109] Mr DU replied to Mr RT on the evening of Friday, 19 March 2021. He alerted Mr RT to his error in alleging that Mr DU had failed to meet his obligations to the court. [110] In that response, he said this: Your firm cannot act without partnership oversight, that is a strict rule of your ability to practice. Despite that, I cannot seem to receive a phone call from any partner. Nor are they included in correspo...

7. [2025] NZEmpC 69  Bread of Life Christian Church in Auckland v Chen [pdf, 431 KB]

   BREAD OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IN AUCKLAND v XI (ROBERT) CHEN [2025] NZEmpC 69 [4 April 2025] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2025] NZEmpC 69 EMPC 141/2024 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN BREAD OF LIFE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IN AUCKLAND Plaintiff AND XI (ROBERT) CHEN Defendant EMPC 181/2024 IN T

8. LCRO 51/2021 KS and BG v WJ (30 September 2024) [pdf, 410 KB]

   LEGAL COMPLAINTS REVIEW OFFICER ĀPIHA AROTAKE AMUAMU Ā-TURE [2024] NZLCRO 122 Ref: LCRO 51/2021 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN KS and BG Applicants AND WJ Respondent DECISION Introduction [1] The applicants, Ms KS and Dr BG, have applied for review of a determination by the [Area] Stan

9. Flawn v Accident Compensation Corporation (Individual Rehabilitation Plan) [2024] NZACC 142 [pdf, 587 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2024] NZACC 142 ACAR 125/23 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN AMBER FLAWN Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 8 July 2024 Heard at: Invercargill/Waihōpai Appearances: P O’Sullivan for the appellant F Becroft for the respondent Judgment: 26 August 2

10. Atkins & Ors as Trustees of the Bruce Family Trust v North Shore City Council [pdf, 284 KB]

    ...Inspections 102 Code Compliance Certificate 102 Inadequate Waterproofing to Parapet Tops 103 Window and Door Joinery Flashing Installation 106 Cladding Below Ground and Floor Level and Cladding Hard Down to Paved Decks 108 Internal Gutter Flashings 110 Glass Penetration to Flat Tops of Balustrades 112 15. Result – Council Liability 114 16. Contribution 115 17. Costs 123 18. Result 123 2. Summary 2.1 The claimants as owners of 18B Manu Place, Albany, claimed varying sums...