Search Results

1. [2019] NZEnvC 013 Horowhenua District Council v Manawatu-Wangagnui Regional Council [pdf, 10 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA Court: Heard: Appearances: Decision No. [2019] NZEnvC I ~ IN THE MATTER AND of the Resource Management Act 1991 a direct referral under s 87G of the Act BETWEEN HOROWHENUA COUNCIL (ENV-2016-WLG-000026) Applicant DISTRICT AND MANAWATU-WANGANUI REGIONAL COUNCIL and HOROWHENUA COUNCIL Consent authorities Environment Judge B P Dwyer Environment Commissioner J R Mills Environment Commissioner J

2. Final Submissions Summary Report [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   Crown/Māori Relations Summary of Submissions Te ara whakamua ā tātou Our path ahead Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this document, the Ministry of Justice disclaims any and all responsibility for any inaccuracy, error, omission, or any other kind of inadequacy, deficiency, or flaw in, or in relation to, the information; and fully exclude

3. Turner v University of Otago [2021] NZHRRT 18 [pdf, 443 KB]

   Reference No. HRRT 011/2015 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN LISA TURNER PLAINTIFF AND THE UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO DEFENDANT AT DUNEDIN BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson Ms GJ Goodwin, Member Ms DL Hart, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr AC Beck and Mr W Forster for plaintiff Mr BCS Dorking and Mr M Couling for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 12 and 13 October 2015; 2 to 5 May 2016 DATE OF DECISION: 25 March 2021 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1

4. [2016] NZEmpC 136 Xtreme Dining Ltd t/a Think Steel v Dewar [pdf, 391 KB]

   XTREME DINING LIMITED TRADING AS THINK STEEL v LEIGHTON DEWAR NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 136 [31 October 2016] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2016] NZEmpC 136 EMPC 73/2016 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN XTREME DINING LIMITED TRADING AS THINK STEEL Plaintiff AND LEIGHTON DEWAR Defendant Hearing: Court: 26 and 27 July 2016 (heard at Christchurch

5. [2020] NZEnvC 211 Panuku Development Auckland Ltd v Auckland Council [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   -~ "- • 1"'-i; ,,____ __ -.. ,::, ,, "'~0URT l)' ,,.v' •c,-• ....,~.u..•.-<....--+ ,,,,._ ~ ~i 3/ BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I MUA I TE KOTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA Kl TAMAKI MAKAURAU IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND AND Decision No. [2020] NZEnvC 2( \ of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) of an appeal pursuant to s 120 of the Act PANUKU DEVELOPMENT AUCKLAND LIMITED (ENV-2018-AKL-000176) Appellant

6. FFNZ - EiC - K L Reilly (5 Feb 2021) [pdf, 522 KB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I MUA I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND of a notice of motion under section 149T(2) to decide proposed Plan Change 7 (referred to the Environment Court by the Minister for the Environment under section 142(2)(b) of the Act) OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL (ENV-2020-CHC-127) Applicant STATEMENT OF EVIDENCE OF KIM LOUISE REILLY FOR FEDERAT

7. LCRO 75/2017, 210/2017 and 212/2017 SW v HB (31 October 2018) [pdf, 425 KB]

   LCRO 75/2017 210/2017 212/2017 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the [Area] Standards Committee BETWEEN SW Applicant and Respondent AND HB Respondent and Applicant The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Introduction [1] Ms SW and Ms HB, both of whom are lawyers, applied for

8. Deputy Registrar v Moeahu – Lot 1 DP 17494 Part Section 2345 New Plymouth (Old Railway Station) (2021) 437 Aotea MB 3 (437 AOT 3) [pdf, 550 KB]

   437 Aotea MB 3 I TE KOOTI WHENUA MĀORI O AOTEAROA I TE ROHE O AOTEA In the Māori Land Court of New Zealand Aotea District A20170004318 WĀHANGA Under Sections 67, 231, 238, 239 and 240, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Lot 1 DP 17494 Part Section 2345 New Plymouth (Old Railway Station) and Other Blocks I WAENGA I A Between ME And ME And DEPUTY REGISTRAR Te Kaitono Appl

9. FINAL Restorative Justice Survey Report September 2021 [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...Restorative Justice Process – By Gender Note: Due to rounding the sum of the individual results may not total 100%. Base: All respondents excluding those who did not answer the question. Males 2018 n=129, 2021 n=146; Females 2018 n=236, 2021 n=110. Ministry of Justice • 2021 Restorative Justice Victim Satisfaction Survey Report • Page 19 The highest satisfaction levels with the restorative justice process overall were recorded among those aged under 20 y...

10. [2021] NZEmpC 169 Smiths City (Southern) Ltd (in receivership) v Claxton [pdf, 518 KB]

    ...April 2013 to 31 January 2019. Those dates appear to have been selected by Smiths City because it considered anything more would be met with a limitation defence.10 She acknowledged that Mr Claxton ceased employment in mid-February 2019. [110] Ms James was given access to financial documents obtained from disclosure recording some, but not all, transactions from 4 October 2011. She was supplied with bank statements, supplier invoices, GST returns, GST working papers, financial...