Search Results

1. Bloor v Karaitiana - Runanga 2E (2021) 259 Waiariki MB 286 (259 WAR 286) [pdf, 275 KB]

   ...is no opposition to the appointments. I have reviewed the consents of John Hirini Rameka and Romani Mere Tahau. Although Mr Bloor has provided 9 Smith v Smith - Nuki o Te Hapū Tahawai ki Rataroa Whānau Trust [2019] Māori Appellate Court MB 110 (2019 APPEAL 110) at [20]. 10 Boase - Wharengaere No 3 (2019) 205 Taitokerau MB 227 (205 TTK 227). 11 Walker – Section 1A Parish of Katikati (1995) 18 Waikato Maniapoto Appellate MB 260 (18 APWM 260). 12 Walker - Section 1A Parish...

2. [2021] NZIACDT - 12 EM v Yong (3 June 2021) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...NZQA assessment, noting that it met the credit and knowledge requirements for the occupation of university lecturer. Ms U set out an assessment of the points obtained for the client’s work history and other factors. She calculated the client had 110 points, but she needed 160 points to be selected. The client was asked if her expression of interest should be lodged. [15] On the same day, Ms U answered the client’s queries about her work experience. [16] On 13 May 2019, the...

3. Southland Standards Committee v P [2022] NZLCDT 12 (28 April 2022) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...as to amount to misconduct, pursuant to ss.12(a), (b) and/or (c), and 241(b) of the Act. Particulars 1. Background 2. Client F 2.1-2.2 – Attorney issues. 2.4(c) – Failed to deposit $520.70 in Trust account contrary to s 110(1)(a). 2(4)(g) and (h) – Attorney issues. 2(4)(i) – Invested his funds to obtain interest – Attorney issue. P had a duty to do so. 2(4)(j) – Fees. 2(4)(k) – Fees (rendered posthumously). 2(4)(l)(iii) – Attorney issue co...

4. [2023] NZREADT 1 - CAC 1904 v Bright (16 January 2023) [pdf, 129 KB]

   ...circumstances. If it was accepted, it would lower the standing and reputation of the profession. PENALTY Jurisdiction and principles [12] The Tribunal’s jurisdiction to impose penalty orders if misconduct is proven is set out in the Act: 110 Determination of charges and orders that may be made if charge proved (1) If the Disciplinary Tribunal, after hearing any charge against a licensee, is satisfied that it has been proved on the balance of probabilities that the licens...

5. Dotcom v Crown Law Office (Damages) [2022] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...submitted to the Court of Appeal that the Tribunal’s decision on the issue of interference with his privacy should be reinstated and the question of damages remitted to the High Court for determination. The Court of Appeal, however, at [109] and [110] resolved to remit the issue of damages to the Tribunal for reconsideration in the light of the Court’s judgment: [109] Mr Mansfield submitted that the appropriate course was for the Tribunal's decision on the issue of interferenc...

6. [2024] NZREADT 12 – CAC 2106 v City Realty (24 April 2024) [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...breach of s 73(b) of the Act and find City Realty guilty of misconduct under s 73(b) of the Act. PENALTY JURISDICTION AND PRINCIPLES [15] The Tribunal’s jurisdiction to impose penalty orders if misconduct is proven is set out in the Act: 110 Determination of charges and orders that may be made if charge proved (1) If the Disciplinary Tribunal, after hearing any charge against a licensee, is satisfied that it has been proved on the balance of probabilities that the licensee has...

7. Family Court applications December 2023 [xlsx, 186 KB]

   ...Tamariki Total 10,797 10,476 10,207 10,050 10,518 10,753 9,381 8,804 8,183 7,749 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Property Application granted 830 827 892 1,004 1,028 839 874 936 768 586 52% 59% 58% 58% 58% 53% 52% 53% 44% 31% Property Dismissed or struck out 123 106 110 131 94 93 81 70 70 19 8% 8% 7% 8% 5% 6% 5% 4% 4% 1% Property Lapsed, withdrawn or discontinued 641 469 532 606 632 596 617 548 418 178 40% 33% 35% 35% 36% 38% 37% 31% 24% 9% Property Application still activ...

8. Family Court applications June 2023 [xlsx, 186 KB]

   ...Hague 73 99 95 112 100 117 91 56 101 90 <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% <1% Mental health 6,559 6,445 7,070 7,108 7,075 7,130 7,366 7,546 7,829 8,191 10% 11% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 12% 14% 14% Oranga Tamariki 11,067 10,557 10,478 10,241 10,068 10,933 9,878 9,110 8,443 7,945 16% 18% 17% 17% 17% 18% 17% 15% 15% 13% Property 1,713 1,486 1,382 1,693 1,721 1,702 1,510 1,885 1,643 1,860 3% 3% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% Protection of personal and property rights 3,491...

9. Protection-order-applications-jun2022-v1.0.xlsx [xlsx, 299 KB]

   ...notice Lapsed Total 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% 100% 100% 0% On notice Withdrawn or discontinued Temporary Protection Order 4 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 2 0 2% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% On notice Withdrawn or discontinued No temporary Protection Order 196 198 105 83 80 93 85 93 110 73 98% 100% 100% 99% 99% 98% 100% 100% 98% 100% On notice Withdrawn or discontinued Total 200 198 105 84 81 95 85 93 112 73 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% On notice Application still activ...

10. Protection order applications June 2023 [xlsx, 296 KB]

    ...notice 210 248 236 260 245 247 305 288 261 294 Waiariki Justice service area total Care of Children Act - - - - - - 1 0 0 1 Waiariki Justice service area total Breach of Police Safety Order 1 1 5 4 7 3 1 4 4 11 Waiariki Justice service area total Sentencing Act 94 98 110 101 86 65 75 94 74 57 Waiariki Justice service area total Total 330 360 365 380 346 329 393 399 352 376 Waiariki Rotorua On notice 12 11 3 5 8 1 5 9 5 4 Waiariki Rotorua Without notice 99 103 136 124 110 143 133 142 95 99...