Search Results

1. People charged and convicted of drug offences December 2017 [xlsx, 712 KB]

   ...Auckland Pukekohe Convicted 87 79 96 82 76 66 47 45 57 64 South Auckland Pukekohe Other proved 10 9 5 10 5 4 7 12 4 6 South Auckland Pukekohe Not proved 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 South Auckland Pukekohe Other 15 16 9 11 9 13 4 3 4 8 South Auckland Pukekohe Total 112 104 110 103 90 83 58 60 65 78 South Auckland Justice service area total Convicted 502 562 616 566 588 557 485 418 495 486 South Auckland Justice service area total Other proved 70 80 64 56 68 43 36 48 32 37 South Auckland Justice s...

2. Nukutere Lands Trust v Trustees of Whitikau A1 – Opape 28 (2013) 70 Waiariki MB 272 (70 WAR 272) [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...October 2005, 89 Ōpōtiki MB 163-174 21 December 2005, 90 Ōpōtiki MB 10-12 18 January 2006, 90 Ōpōtiki MB 55 (Heard at Rotorua) 13 February 2006, 90 Ōpōtiki MB 148-149 (Heard at Ōpōtiki) 27 February 2006, 92 Ōpōtiki MB 71-240 7 August 2009, 110 Ōpōtiki MB 77-78 22 March 2010, 4 Waiariki MB 8-9 18 May 2010, 8 Waiariki 126-127 30 May 2010, 9 Waiairiki MB 131 30 August 2010, 16 Waiariki MB 275-277 70 Waiariki MB 273 26 Janurary 2011, 26 Waiariki MB 285-287 (Teleco...

3. KR v WH LCRO 141 / 2010 (14 May 2012) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...previous decision from this Office, A v Z (LCRO) 40/2009 which requires that a solicitor must have the client’s signed consent to deduct fees. The information provided to KR would not have been sufficient to meet those requirements. [55] Section 110(1)(b) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 provides as follows;- A practitioner who, in the course of his or her practice receives money for, or on behalf of, any person – 12 (b) must hold the money, or ensure that th...

4. Milner v Milner - Estate of Warihi Te Keu Faenza Milner (2008) 83 Ruatoria MB 108 (83 RUA 108) [pdf, 2.8 MB]

   ...sucb of tbe s8Jd DION A11LNER and CLA UDETTE MILNER as survive the veslJilg date and If botb tben in eqllal shares, absolutely, in accordance with the foregoing provisions offhis clause and upon the making of such an order my trustees shall hc7ve 110 mrther responsibility to see the application of/he iI1come uOIn those lands . .. Notices 01' Letters of Opposition [3] The Maori Land Court received several notices or letters of opposition to the appHcation from: >- James Hugh...

5. Complaint Assessment Committee 403 v Licensee B [2017] NZREADT 21 [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...similar conduct, in similar circumstances. The Tribunal should impose the least punitive penalty that is appropriate in the circumstances. While there is an element of punishment, rehabilitation is an important consideration.8 [14] Section 110(2) of the Act sets out the orders the Tribunal may make by way of penalty. Those that may be relevant to the present case are that the Tribunal may: [a] Make any of the orders that a Complaints Assessment Committee may impose under s 93 o...

6. Alasdair Morrison (dated 2 June 2017) [pdf, 3.9 MB]

   ...remain strongly opposed to the proposed wind turbine project. 4. I am not opposed to various forms of ‘alternative energy’, be it wind power, solar power, wave power, or any other form, but I am very much opposed to the proposal to erect a 110 metre high wind turbine on top of Porteous Hill above Warrington. 5. I am a former Merchant Navy Marine Engineering Officer, and a former Manager of Dunedin’s major Ship Repair & Heavy Engineering company, during which time I was of...

7. Kapua - Estate of Ngamotu Paora [2019] Chief Judge's MB 1162 (2019 CJ 1162) [pdf, 389 KB]

   ...– 184. 12. A total of 2.65463 shares (under the name Paora te Hiko) were received on succession to Hakopa Te Hiko recorded at 49 Taupo MB 194 (20 April 1974). The determination of beneficiaries was based upon previous evidence recorded at 110 Rotorua MB 261 (12 March 1959). 13. The evidence recorded at 110 Rotorua MB 261 sets out the persons entitled to succeed to the interests of Hakopa Te Hiko were Paora Te Hiko (1/2) and the 2019 Chief Judge’s MB 1167 issue of R...

8. [2023] NZREADT 9 – Complaints Assessment Committee 2108 v O’Brien & Wildman (28 April 2023) [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...apologetic to all parties concerned. She will accept the penalty as the Tribunal sees fit. PENALTY Jurisdiction and principles [25] The Tribunal’s jurisdiction to impose penalty orders if misconduct is proven is set out in the Act: 110 Determination of charges and orders that may be made if charge proved (1) If the Disciplinary Tribunal, after hearing any charge against a licensee, is satisfied that it has been proved on the balance of probabilities that the licensee has...

9. [2023] NZREADT 25 CAC 2102 v Hoogwerf (25 September 2023) [pdf, 238 KB]

   ...is a legal fiction of common law representing an objective standard against which individual conduct can be measured but under s 73(a) that reasonable 2 Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s 105. 3 Section 109(1). 4 Section 109(4). 5 Section 110. 6 Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 at [101]–[102] and [112]. 7 Morton-Jones v Real Estate Agents Authority [2016] NZHC 1804. 8 person is qualified to be an agent of good standing or a...

10. [2024] NZREADT 20 CAC2108 v Leading Edge Properties Ltd (25 June 2024) [pdf, 237 KB]

    ...breach of s 73(b) of the Act and find Leading Edge guilty of misconduct under s 73(b) of the Act. PENALTY JURISDICTION AND PRINCIPLES [27] The Tribunal’s jurisdiction to impose penalty orders if misconduct is proven is set out in the Act: 110 Determination of charges and orders that may be made if charge proved (1) If the Disciplinary Tribunal, after hearing any charge against a licensee, is satisfied that it has been proved on the balance of probabilities that the licensee has...