Search Results

1. People charged and convicted of drug offences June 2017 [xlsx, 687 KB]

   ...depressants Total 226 173 217 199 200 279 179 192 155 140 Other or unspecified drug Convicted 1,067 1,111 1,261 1,189 1,231 1,196 1,080 1,164 1,205 911 Other or unspecified drug Other proved 64 84 89 82 69 64 37 26 33 42 Other or unspecified drug Not proved 1,190 1,110 1,522 1,097 1,074 968 1,181 1,029 903 501 Other or unspecified drug Other 6 2 1 2 4 10 3 5 0 0 Other or unspecified drug Total 2,327 2,307 2,873 2,370 2,378 2,238 2,301 2,224 2,141 1,454 1b.Charges by offence type Table 1...

2. Name suppression December 2023 [xlsx, 135 KB]

   ...suppression Convicted 3,112 2,946 3,042 3,555 3,325 2,968 3,248 3,009 3,593 4,448 54% 47% 51% 54% 53% 51% 51% 47% 48% 52% Other proved 179 193 203 205 238 235 207 208 231 297 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 3% Not proved 2,430 2,922 2,563 2,642 2,544 2,548 2,743 2,837 3,466 3,468 42% 47% 43% 40% 41% 44% 43% 45% 46% 40% Other 88 152 164 143 110 87 154 286 246 365 2% 2% 3% 2% 2% 1% 2% 5% 3% 4% Total 5,809 6,213 5,972 6,545 6,217 5,838 6,352 6,340 7,536 8,578 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%...

3. Hart v Auckland Standards Committee 1 of the New Zealand Law Society CIV 2012 404 5076 5528 [pdf, 515 KB]

   HART V AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 OF NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY HC AK CIV- 2012-404-5076 THIS JUDGMENT IS SUBJECT TO THE SUPPRESSION ORDERS CONTAINED IN PARAGRAPH [246] IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY CIV-2012-404-5076 CIV-2012-404-5528 BETWEEN BARRY JOHN HART Appellant AND AUCKLAND STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 OF NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY Respondent Hearing: 10 & 11 December 2012 Court: Winkelmann J Lang J Counsel: A Trenw

4. [2015] NZSSAA 004, 13 February [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...the same.1 (ii) There is co-extensiveness of proof between the court proceedings and the proceedings before the Authority. 1 Gregoriadis v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [1986] 1 NZLR 110. 3 (iii) The issues decided in the previous proceedings are the same as the issues to be decided by this Authority. (iv) There is no new material relevant to the correctness or incorrectness of the decision which could not by rea...

5. Auckland Standards Committee 4 v Thomas [2016] NZLCDT 5 [pdf, 50 KB]

   ...[14] Counsel submitted that the following factors were relevant to the making of the orders that were asked for: (a) The respondent allowed trust money to be released from the JPFT and in doing so was aware that he risked being in breach of s 110 of the Act and reg 12(6) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Trust Account) Regulations 2006; (b) He knew of the lack of the consent of one of the trustees; (c) Had failed in an application to the Family Court to have the funds relea...

6. REAA CAC 10054 v Hume [2014] NZREADT 10 [pdf, 82 KB]

   ...previous findings of unsatisfactory conduct discussed below). Mr Clancy submits for the prosecution/Authority that cancellation is appropriate based solely on the defendant’s post November 2009 conduct. Penalty under the 2008 Act [13] Section 110(2) of the 2008 Act sets out the extensive orders which we may make following a finding of misconduct. Those include an order cancelling the licence of the licensee, an order suspending the licence of the licensee for a period not exceedi...

7. CAC 20004 v Wotherspoon [2014] NZREADT 27 [pdf, 58 KB]

   ...Unsatisfactory conduct If the Tribunal, after hearing the charges above, is not satisfied that the Defendant is guilty of misconduct, CAC 20004 further alleges that the Defendant has engaged in unsatisfactory conduct and seeks a finding under s 110(4) of the Act. Discussion [2] Mr Wotherspoon came to the Tribunal today and indicated that he would plead guilty to unsatisfactory conduct in respect of this charge. [3] It is for the Tribunal to determine if the charge has been establ...

8. Baigent v ACC [2011] NZACA 3 [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...Authority determined, inter alia, at pages 14 and 15: “[179] As stated above, in order for the appellant to succeed with this appeal he must demonstrate that the exercise of the Corporation’s discretion in 1975/75 was manifestly wrong. [110] ... There is simply no evidence available to shed light on the Corporation’s exercise of its discretion in 1974/75. The documentary evidence relied on by the appellant are estimations and approximations. Any recollections are alm...

9. Morgan v ACC [2011] NZACA 2 [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...Authority determined, inter alia, at pages 14 and 15: '7179J As stated above, in order for the appellant to succeed with this appeal he must demonstrate that the exercise of the Corporation's discretion in 1975175 was manifestly wrong. [110]. .. There is simply no evidence available to shed light on the Corporation's exercise of its discretion in 1974175. The documentary evidence relied on by the appellant are estimations and approximations. Any recollections are almo...

10. Rountree - Kohatutaka 6A4A (2008) 127 Whangarei MB 163 (127 WH 163) [pdf, 294 KB]

    ...legally adopted but am not blood related to either the deceased or the land. " The COUlt'S decision in relation to the house was as follows: "The house on Kohatlltaka 6A4A was determined infavour or Whatia Rountree (Reference KH 110 dated 29110192). After discussion it was decided that the land interests should be vested between the two equally and the house can be another issue which can be discllssed and dealt with at a later date. The family do not wish to set lip a wh...