Search Results

1. People charged and convicted of sexual offences December 2022 [xlsx, 394 KB]

   ...Total 5,881 5,244 5,701 5,499 5,465 5,484 5,053 5,072 5,791 6,392 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Children (under 16 years) Convicted 1,929 1,914 1,983 1,860 2,014 1,969 1,734 1,631 1,834 2,300 47% 54% 49% 48% 53% 52% 52% 47% 48% 51% Other proved 80 80 103 94 114 75 88 49 110 134 2% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 1% 3% 3% Not proved 2,020 1,497 1,818 1,778 1,539 1,675 1,468 1,722 1,686 1,852 49% 42% 45% 46% 40% 44% 44% 49% 44% 41% Other 93 53 124 109 154 57 71 91 219 186 2% 1% 3%...

2. CAC 10040 v de Ruyter [2013] NZREADT 106 [pdf, 62 KB]

   ...[12] Ms de Ruyter has informed the Tribunal that she is no longer working as a licensed agent. However having heard this evidence the Tribunal conclude that the only appropriate penalty is for Ms de Ruyter to have her license cancelled under s 110(b). We also impose upon Ms de Ruyter a fine in the sum of $5,000. [13] The Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. DATED at AUCKLAND this 3rd day of December 2013 ________________...

3. CAC20005 v Cui [2015] NZREADT 23 [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...[11] Given our finding that the purchasers would not have made further offers for the property had the Notice To Fix been fully and carefully brought to their attention, Mr Clancy submits that we should also make an order for compensation under s.110(2)(g) of the 2008 Act which reads: “110 Determination of charges and orders that may be made if charge proved … (2) The orders are as follows: … (g) where it appears to the Tribunal that any person has suffered loss by reason...

4. Meulenbroek v Vision Antenna Systems Ltd (Costs) [2015] NZHRRT 3 [pdf, 52 KB]

   ...advanced by Vision under s 28(3) of the Act. [13] We cannot accept the submission by Vision that this was a test case. Most, if not all of the primary legal issues were settled in Nakarawa as can be seen from the Meulenbroek decision at [103] to [110]. The main task of the Tribunal was to apply the law (as set out in Nakarawa and expressly not challenged by Vision) to the facts. When the Tribunal addressed s 28(3) of the Act at [135] it specifically cited Nakarawa as correctly settin...

5. Maiava v Matauri X Incorporation (2010) 10 Taitokerau MB 106 (10 TTK 106) [pdf, 60 KB]

   ...prevent an applicant from access to the Courts, which is not lightly to be denied: A S MacLachlan Limited v MEL Network Limited (2002) 16 PRNZ 747. [18] Finally, I must have regard to the overall interests of justice. 10 Taitokerau MB 110 Discussion [19] I deal first with Mrs Maiava’s financial circumstances. Mr Gillespie stated in his affidavit that he understood Mrs Maiava was of “limited financial resources” (paragraph 6). Mrs Maiava responded to that evidence...

6. Notes from Crown Maori Relations hui Christchurch 15 April 2018 [pdf, 412 KB]

   TE ARA WHAKAMUA Ā TĀTOU -OUR PATH AHEAD CROWN/MĀORI RELATIONS HUI NOTES Date of hui: 15 April 2018 Venue: Tuahiwi Marae Attendees: Approx. 110 hui participants Hon Kelvin Davis, Minister for Crown/Māori Relations, Hon Eugenie Sage, Minister for Conservation Rino Tirakatene MP Nuk Korako MP Deborah Mahuta-Coyle, Senior Ministerial Advisor to Hon Davis Te Rau Kupenga, Crown Facilitator Officials from: • the Crown/Māori Relations Roopu, Te Tāhū o te Ture /...

7. BORA Land Transport (Enforcement Powers) Amendment Bill [pdf, 297 KB]

   ...charges are yet to be determined; and 9.3. Impoundment can also cease before the expiry of the 28 day period on appeal by the driver or owner on various grounds, rather than only when charges have been dismissed or do not proceed: see ss 102(1) and 110 LTA. 10. also note, in this respect, that the explanatory note to the Bill records serious risks to public safety and broader public disorder arising from the particular kinds of conduct concerned and the shortcomings of prosecution, conv...

8. BORA Limitation Bill [pdf, 285 KB]

   ...a claimant should not be entitled to sue the Crown indefinitely just because the basis of his complaint is the violation of a constitutional right. ...” The exception, as noted in Pearson and following Prete v Ontario (Attorney-General) (1993) 110 DLR (4th) 94, is that exceptionally short periods applicable to claims against public bodies (in Prete, a six month limit in respect of such claims) that can be regarded as an attempt by governments to immunise themselves against Charter liab...

9. The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 413) v Mairs [2018] NZREADT 41 [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...will be supported by a sentence which demonstrates the seriousness with which a charge of this kind should be regarded. [14] We consider that the starting point is that cancellation of the licence of the licensee is called for pursuant to s 110(2)(b). [15] While that is the starting point, any matters in mitigation that are relevant could influence the decision as to whether a cancellation order should actually be made. Mr Mairs, though, declined to provide any information to...

10. Reedy - Waitangi A1A2 (2003) 65 Ruatōria MB 168 (65 RUA 168) [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    ...the substantive issue before me are considered fully below. Mr Tawera obtained an interim injunction but that injunction was cancelled and the application filed in his name under section 238/93 was dismissed by consent on 21 March 2003 at 65 Rua MB 110. On the same day I dismissed the application filed Minute Book: 65 RUA 170 by Mr Reedy and indicated that I would provide detailed reasons for doing so, hence this judgment. Relevant Law and Application to Facts Although a number o...