Search Results

1. Martin Te Kaha 45B2 (2007) 95 Opotiki MB 108 (95 OPO 108) [pdf, 361 KB]

   ...intersection. The motive behind the application, as recorded in a letter to the Court dated 2 June 2006 from MTEC who acted for the applicants, was to simply widen the legal roadway to accommodate the physically formed roadway. 95 Opotiki MB 110 Maori Land Court Hearings [7] On 2 February 2006, I directed this matter be set down for hearing in Opotiki and that the applicant advertise notice of the application and date of hearing in the Opotiki News, the local newspaper that ci...

2. [2019] NZREADT 43 - Troughton v Registrar of the Real Estate Agents Authority (10 Oct 2019) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...has subsequently been dishonoured. [17] Section 55 of the Act sets out the process to be followed by the Registrar: 55 Process for cancellation (1) The process for cancellation of a licence, other than by determination of the Tribunal under s 110 or at the request of the licensee under s 54(b), is as follows: (a) the Registrar must give the licensee written notice of the Registrar’s intention to cancel the licence; and (b) the notice must – (i) contain or be accompanie...

3. Taku - Torere 64 Inc (2018) 204 Waiariki MB 115 (204 WAR 115) [pdf, 262 KB]

   ...the Court”. This is what is known as a “slip” provision and does not enable the Court to change the outcome of an order if the Court simply got the order wrong. The various orders with which we are concerned do not come under s 86. … [110] As far as the general problems with the incorporations’ share registers are concerned, although the two s 281 applications have brought the issues to the attention of the Court, s 281(2) only allows the Court to exercise the powers c...

4. READT annual report 2022 [pdf, 274 KB]

   ...person.23 It is rare for the Tribunal to supress the name of the licensee against whom a complaint is upheld, given the public interest in knowing the names of those who misconduct themselves. The Tribunal does, 14 Section 73. 15 Section 110. 16 Section 105(1). 17 Section 107(1). 18 Section 107(3). 19 Section 107A. 20 Section 114. 21 Section 116. 22 Section 116A. 23 Section 108(1). 5 however, have a practice of suppressing the names of complainants,...

5. [2023] NZREADT 26 – Day v REAA (20 September 2023) [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...including the failure to complete continuing education. The Registrar must follow the process specified in s 55: 55 Process for cancellation (1) The process for cancellation of a licence, other than by determination of the Tribunal under section 110 or at the request of the licensee under section 54(b), is as follows: (a) the Registrar must give the licensee written notice of the Registrar’s intention to cancel the licence; and 4 (b) the notice must— (i) contain or be...

6. Brown v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023 NZACC 204] [pdf, 252 KB]

   ...paragraph [48] to hold that: The facts of the case indicate that for the amount of time that Mr Brown worked in the relevant period, he was paid a reasonable amount, and that the 5 Nicholas v Accident Compensation Corporation [2008] NZACC 110 6 Shaffett v Accident Compensation Corporation [2012] NZACC 367 relevant income tax return amount was a reasonable representation of his earnings. [21] Mr Hlavac submits that the fact that the Court did not clarify generally the...

7. NZCVS Cycle 4 2020-21 Controlling behaviours and help-seeking data tables [xlsx, 512 KB]

   ...private 244 14.88 23.12 3.11 . * 139 22.42 # 26.92 5.19 .‡ * 100 21.89 # 18.90 3.80 .‡ Rented, government (local/central) 39 35.59 # 26.13 8.29 .‡ 29 42.22 # 30.08 10.59 . S S SŜ SŜ Financial pressure (ability to afford purchasing a non-essential item for $300) Not at all limited 229 15.88 12.51 1.86 . * 110 26.77 # 13.72 3.28 .‡ * 118 19.96 11.51 2.14 . * A little limited 149 18.66 19.46 3.29 . 79 26.75 # 19.56 4.47 .‡ 69 29.05 # 19.40 4.74 .‡ Quite or...

8. [2012] NZEmpC 110 de Bruin v Canterbury DH [pdf, 199 KB]

   DE BRUIN V CANTERBURY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD NZEmpC CHCH [2012] NZEmpC 110 [11 July 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2012] NZEmpC 110 CRC 4/12 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN KEES DE BRUIN Plaintiff AND CANTERBURY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: 5-7 June 2012 (Heard at Christchurch) Counsel: Andrew McKenzie, counsel for the plaintiff Penny Shaw, counsel fo...

9. ENVC Hearing 6Oct14 DM expert Bridget Gilbert [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...Drive and 171 Nick Johnstone Drive which I have marked on Appendix D attached, together with the identification of existing dwellings within the catchment. The 11 7 and 9 Ocean View Road and 110 Delamore Drive 12 For example, see Scott Photograph D Aerial view down the gateway valley and Appendix re Comprehensive Development 13 Brown EiC paragraph 12 12 spatial arrangement of buildings (both built and unbuilt) shown in...

10. Edinburgh Realty Ltd & Ors v CAC20004 & Anor [2016] NZREADT 5 [pdf, 320 KB]

    ...the conduct covered above by the said agents is not merely unsatisfactory conduct but is misconduct in terms of the definition of “misconduct” in s 73 of the Act; so that we may award compensation for a sum not exceeding $100,000 by virtue of s 110(1)(g). [91] Inter alia, Mr Gray submits there is overwhelming evidence before us that the property suffered from leaky building syndrome. [92] Mr Gray completed his typed submissions with the following paragraphs: “[94] In the presen...