Search Results

1. Te Manutukutuku Issue 21 [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...that public access to the forest park and day-to-day management should continue under the provisions of the current legislation, with the rider that 'Until these negotiations are completed, neither the THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL, Seabridge House, 110 Featherston Street, PO Box 5022, DX 8101 , Wellington Tel (04) 4993666 Fax (04) 4993676 .. Crown nor any State-owned enterprise should seek to alienate lands or forests in or adjacent to Pureora Forest Park'. As a result of its...

2. Te Manutukutuku Issue 14 [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...Quay. Tel: 0-4-472 8500 Fax: 0-4-472 8504 Proposed meeting schedule 1992 Wednesday 25 March Tuesday 5 May Tuesday 16 June Tuesday 28 July Tuesday 8 September Tuesday 13 October Tuesday 17 November THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL, Seabridge House, 110 Featherston Street, PO Box 5022, Wellington Tel (04 ) 4993666 Fax (04 ) 499 3676 Waitangi Tribunal Receives Variety of Claims A recent exercise was carried out by the Tribunal to list the different types of claims against the Crown that...

3. Te Manutukutuku Issue 12 [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...flsh spine. The moon shapes are intended to represent nga ara po - the different phases of the moon when used for fishing. ISSN 0114-717X Number 12 October 1991 Te Kapapi 0 Te Rallgi carved by Ted Nia THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL, Seabridge House, 110 Featherston Street, PO Box 5022, Wellington Tel (04) 499 3666 Fax (04) 4993676 - NGAI TAHU SEA FISHERIES CLAIM The sea fisheries section of the Tribunal report on the Ngai Tahu claim is a step closer to completion. Final submissions...

4. Lavender v Attorney-General (Strike-Out Application) [2021] NZHRRT 52 [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...cannot be answered without discovery and evidence, including evidence of the policy underpinning the relevant provisions of the Accident Compensation Act 2001 (AC Act). Reliance is placed on Williams v Police [2021] NZHC 808, (2021) 12 HRNZ 545 at [110], a decision which underlined the importance of a hearing at which relevant evidence is adduced and examined. [6] The decision in Williams v Police is under appeal, leave having been granted by the High Court in Williams v New Zealand Po...

5. [2021] NZREADT 39 - Lee (29 July 2021) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...similar conduct, in similar circumstances. The Tribunal should impose the least punitive penalty that is appropriate in the circumstances. While there is an element of punishment, rehabilitation is an important consideration.4 [13] Section 110(2) of the Act sets out the orders the Tribunal may make by way of penalty. As relevant to the present case, the Tribunal may: [a] make any of the orders that a Complaints Assessment Committee may make under s 93 of the Act (following a fi...

6. Towler - Succession to Mona Towler (2021) 435 Aotea MB 37 (435 AOT 37) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...the Law Reform (Testamentary Promises) Act 1949 if the application relates only to Māori freehold land.7 1 Re Ratcliffe [2021] NZHC 1 2 Re Ryan [2021] NZHC 135 3 Re King [2021] NZHC 963 4 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, ss 108, 109 and 110. See also Administration Act 1969, s 79 5 Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, s 102 6 Te Ture Whenua (Succession, Dispute Resolution, and Related Matters) Amendment Act 2020, ss 85-86 7 Ibid, ss 94-95 435 Aotea MB 43 [19] Therefore,...

7. 2018 Decisions of public interest

   ...–three months lost remuneration plus unpaid wages ordered – factors in assessing quantum of compensation considered – high end harm - greater compensation than claimed could not be awarded – $20,000 ordered in favour of defendant. [2018] NZEmpC 110 A Labour Inspector v Prabh Ltd (Judgment of Judge M E Perkins, 24 September 2018) BREACH OF MINIMUM STANDARDS – PENALTIES – serious breaches – vulnerable employees – immigration issues – principles applying to calculation of penalti...

   Located in:

   1. Employment Court >
   2. Judgments >
   3. Decisions of public interest

8. Tsai Mao TRI 2016-100-00010 [2018] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 [pdf, 491 KB]

   IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI 2016-100-00010 [2018] NZWHT AUCKLAND 01 BETWEEN PHORINA CHIEH-HSIN TSAI AND FERGUS TI-WEN MAO First Claimants AND UPPER HUTT CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND MICHAEL ANTHONY BARROTT Second Respondent AND MICHAEL DANIEL KEANE (REMOVED) Third Respondent AND PANELCRETE CONSTRUCTION LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 40222) (REMOVED) Fourth Respondent AND PHILLIP ERIC GORRIE AND ROBYN JUNE BOND Fifth Respondent A

9. People with finalised charges and convicted of sexual offences December 2023 [xlsx, 389 KB]

   ...Total 5,244 5,701 5,499 5,442 5,495 5,053 5,083 5,775 6,418 7,036 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Children (under 16 years) Convicted 1,914 1,983 1,860 1,992 1,977 1,733 1,647 1,840 2,299 2,396 54% 49% 48% 52% 52% 52% 47% 48% 51% 50% Other proved 80 103 94 114 75 88 49 110 131 79 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 1% 3% 3% 2% Not proved 1,497 1,818 1,778 1,539 1,680 1,468 1,724 1,688 1,875 2,092 42% 45% 46% 41% 44% 44% 49% 44% 42% 44% Other 53 124 109 154 57 71 91 219 186 213 1% 3% 3%...

10. People charged and convicted of sexual offences June 2018 [xlsx, 503 KB]

    ...proved 2 3 3 0 2 3 1 3 0 1 Not proved 75 35 56 44 42 33 32 67 61 41 Other 0 3 0 2 16 0 35 6 1 1 Total 128 77 94 77 89 76 102 99 122 113 Unknown age and/or gender Convicted 112 277 117 111 227 189 299 209 189 153 Other proved 6 3 4 11 4 13 6 7 7 11 Not proved 110 133 137 147 134 118 191 182 126 132 Other 1 18 4 0 4 2 8 18 3 4 Total 229 431 262 269 369 322 504 416 325 300 1b.Charges by offence & outcome Table 1b: Number of charges for sexual offences, by offence type and cha...