Search Results

1. [2023] NZEnvC 225 The Olive Leaf Centre Trust v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 581 KB]

   THE OLIVE LEAF CENTRE TRUST v QLDC – DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 225 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN THE OLIVE LEAF CENTRE TRUST (ENV-2021-CHC-01) Appellant AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge P A Steven Environment Commissioner K A Edmonds Hearing: at Queenstown on 8, 9,

2. Environment Court annual report 2007 [pdf, 514 KB]

   ...at 1463. Jul-06 Aug-06 Sep-06 Oct-06 Nov-06 Dec-06 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 On Hand 1394 1364 1370 1347 1373 1334 1346 1416 1533 1497 1492 1459 Filed 43 115 71 97 69 91 148 185 74 84 91 74 Determined 73 109 94 71 108 79 78 68 110 89 124 70 Caseload 1364 1370 1347 1373 1334 1346 1416 1533 1497 1492 1459 1463 1 The Report of the Registrar for the 12 months ending 30 June 2006 reported the then caseload at 1374. This re...

3. Manuirirangi v Parininihi Ki Waitotara Incorporation - Waiokura Te Kauae blocks, Section 27-29, 33,34, 40-44 and Section 111 Block VII Waimate Survey District and Lot 1 Deposited Plan 5603 (2013) 312 Aotea MB 104 (312 AOT 104) [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...land from the legal owner against its wishes in the circumstances of this case and outside of the public works regime seems an unlikely prospect. In any event if the parties cannot agree because one participant cannot accept the 312 Aotea MB 110 terms of the other then any resolution of the claims by the Trust against PKW will remain elusive. [27] By way of observation I note that the Waitangi Tribunal can inquire into acts or omissions of the Crown in breach of the princip...

4. ENVC Matiatia party corresp WMLFeb15 submission oppose DMI interlocutory [pdf, 2.5 MB]

   ...original application did not include this land in the area for which consent was sought for a new service station as the application had committed that land separately through a subdivision application for another use. 26. Re-Iocating parking (for 110 berths at a ratio of 0.35, meaning 39 parks, more or less) in a location and on terms which the Court can determine is acceptable for berth holder parking is not in substance a different application, and does not result in the propos...

5. Waters v Alpine Energy Ltd (Adjournment Application) [2015] NZHRRT 17 [pdf, 59 KB]

   ...advance of http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1908/0089/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM1817635#DLM1817635� 5 the hearing, whether Mr Waters has applied for a summons or whether one or more have been issued. The only statutory requirement in s 110 of the Human Rights Act is that the summons be served at least 24 hours before the attendance of the witness is required (if the summons is delivered personally to the person summonsed) or 10 days before the date of attendance where servi...

6. Asad v Patel [2014] NZIACDT 61 (30 April 2014) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...Immigration New Zealand, on 31 January 2012. The documents identified the adviser 3 as the licensed immigration adviser but it appears that the documents may have been prepared by unlicensed employees. [6.6] The expression of interest claimed 110 points, with no job offer. Accordingly, the expression of interest had no realistic chance of selection from the pool. [6.7] The adviser took over the instructions from the unlicensed employees; they left his practice after lodgin...

7. WB v Stevenson LCRO 301/2013 (11 December 2014) [pdf, 112 KB]

   ...virtue of the fact that the funds were held for Mr and Ms VA jointly and therefore for the purpose of dealing with the funds (and Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Trust Account) Regulations 2008) both Mr VA and Ms VA were her clients. [14] By s 110 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 Ms Stevenson held money on behalf of both Mr VA and Ms VA and was obliged to “hold the money, or ensure that the money is held, exclusively for [Mr and Ms VA], to be paid to that person or as [M...

8. AR v PI LCRO 157/2013 (10 October 2014) [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...that basis s 138(1)(d) could be invoked as the reason to decline to take any further action. However, I acknowledge that Ms PI’s clients are the persons who are aggrieved by Mr AR’s conduct, and they desire that action be taken. [26] Section 110 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 obliges a lawyer to hold money exclusively for his or her client, such money to be paid to the client or as the client directs. This section expresses one of the fundamental obligations of a lawy...

9. Faleauto v DE LCRO 99/2015 (29 November 2016) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...in which it concluded there had been unsatisfactory conduct on his part. He acknowledges he received money directly from 2 Mr DE, who was a private client, in advance of rendering an invoice, which the Committee concluded contravened ss 110(2) and 112(1) of the Act, regs 9 and 10 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Trust Account) Regulations 2008 (the Trust Account Regulations), and rr 9.3 and 14.2 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules...

10. Complaints Assessment Committee 412 v Singh [2019] NZREADT 004 [pdf, 187 KB]

    ...similar conduct, in similar circumstances. The Tribunal should impose the least punitive penalty that is appropriate in the circumstances. While there is an element of punishment, rehabilitation is an important consideration.5 [18] Section 110(2) of the Act sets out the orders the Tribunal may make by way of penalty. As may be relevant to the present case the Tribunal may: [a] Make any of the orders that a Complaints Assessment Committee may make under s 93 of the Act (these in...