Search Results

1. [2016] NZEmpC 107 Watson v Capital & Coast District Health Board [pdf, 120 KB]

   ...Amendment Act (No 2) 1980, but that statutory protection was not carried over to the Evidence Act 2006. Nor does such a privilege exist on a common law basis: CAC v Medical Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal [2006] 3 NZLR 577 at [13]-[17] and [96]-[110]. her possession, custody or control, when such documents were parted with and what has become of them. The sworn or affirmed statement is to be filed and served by 12 September 2016. The documents to which the sworn or affi...

2. Warbrick - Estate of Rooha Ratahi (2004) 106 South Island MB 197 (106 SI 197) [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...(10 I) Stanley Ratahi (102) Maude Katrina (103) Miriama Ratahi (104) David Kaniwahia Ratahi (105) Enid Aniko Pearl Ratahi No.3 Mihaka Ratahi left 43 WH 62 (106) Tureiti Ratahi (107) Wiremu Ratahi (108) Te Kohi Ratahi (109) Paina Ratahi (110) Tiki Ratahi (Ill) Tani Ratahi (112) Rupia Ratahi (113) lliipera Ratahi (114) Wiki Ratahi No.5 Te Hum Ratahi left ROT 199/36 (115) Marion Armstrong (116) Lillian Heta (117) Barhara Greening (118) Rosa Lloyd (119) Rangi Hohepa (120) J...

3. Castle v Castle - Waitakaruru 1A1B2C and D1 (2001) 103 Hauraki MB 107 (103 H 107) [pdf, 2.3 MB]

   ...on 21 May 2000 at the request of Lesley the police arrived and served a trespass notice on him. Many of his family were then present as it was the weekend of the commemoration of his father's death. Hauraki Minute Book Volume 103 Folio 110 Page 4 Lesley told the Court that the consent to occupy the house site was given only to Dordy. He had no right of assignment, she had not consented to the assignment and would not consent to the assignment to Cyril. She did not oppose...

4. LCRO 230/2018 TM - Application for Review of a Prosecutorial Decision (3 April 2019) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...14 LCRO 125/2015 (24 August 2017) (Unpublished decision). 15 At [30]. 16 Duncan Webb, Kathryn Dalziel and Kerry Cook Ethics, Professional Responsibility and the Lawyer (3rd ed, LexisNexis, Wellington, 2016) at 107 and 110. 7 [32] The authors referred to Myers v Elman as a useful guide. In that case, the Court was exercising its inherent jurisdiction to discipline a lawyer in the course of a trial for misconduct. Lord Wright said:17 The matter compla

5. Evidence Brief: Three strikes law [pdf, 437 KB]

   ...New Zealand’s three strikes law is needed to make any firm conclusions regarding the law’s effect. EVIDENCE BRIEF SUMMARY Evidence rating: Inconclusive Unit cost: $61,543 per prisoner until population exceeds current capacity. $110,075 mean cost per prisoner as prison capacity is expanded. Effect size (number needed to treat): Unclear. Current spend: $800,059 (as of July 2018) Unmet demand: N/A THREE STRIKES LAW: EVIDENCE BRIEF...

6. Real Estate Agents Authority v Wallace [2016] NZREADT 71 [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...s 37(1) of the Act, Ms Wallace’s conviction for a crime involving dishonesty prohibits her from holding a licence for a period of ten years, we have concluded that the appropriate penalty is to censure Ms Wallace, and to make an order under s 110(2)(g) for compensation to be paid to Mr Kendall. Orders [44] Leave is given for the charge of misconduct, laid by Complaints Assessment Committee 20001 under s 73(a) of the Act, to be withdrawn. [45] The charge of misconduct, laid by Co...

7. CAC 416 v Prasad [2019] NZREADT 17 - Penalty [pdf, 202 KB]

   ...similar conduct, in similar circumstances. The Tribunal should impose the least punitive penalty that is appropriate in the circumstances. While there is an element of punishment, rehabilitation is an important consideration.7 [11] Section 110(2) of the Act sets out the orders the Tribunal may make by way of penalty. As may be relevant to the present case the Tribunal may: [a] Make any of the orders that a Complaints Assessment Committee may impose under s 93 of the Act (these...

8. Water quality in Otago July 2015 to June 2020 [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Tokomairiro at Blackbridge Fair 0.0274 1780 0.029 0.311 4.87 93 * Tokomairiro at Lisnatunny Good 0.0215 500 0.023 0.245 4.15 94 Tokomairiro at West Branch Bridge Good 0.0167 296 0.014 0.261 2.77 96 Tuapeka at 700m u/s bridge Fair 0.0145 283 0.028 0.110 3.25 108 Waipahi at Cairns Peak Poor 0.0321 729 0.018 0.641 7.42 109 Waipahi at Waipahi Good 0.0149 239 0.024 0.872 2.49 11 Wairuna at Millar Road Poor 0.0512 906 0.107 1.020 14.4 112 Waitahuna at Tweeds Bridge Good 0.01...

9. 0-TAT-3-DG-R-General.pdf [pdf, 8.5 MB]

   ...SHEET 5 10. TAT-3-DG-R-0106 C GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SHEET 6 11. TAT-3-DG-R-0107 C GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SHEET 7 12. TAT-3-DG-R-0108 C GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SHEET 8 13. TAT-3-DG-R-0109 C GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SHEET 9 14. TAT-3-DG-R-0110 D GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SHEET 10 15. TAT-3-DG-R-0111 C GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SHEET 11 16. TAT-3-DG-R-0112 C GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SHEET 12 17. TAT-3-DG-R-0113 C GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN - SHEET 13 18. TAT-3-DG-R-0114 C GENER...

10. CAC403 v Mansell [2019] NZREADT 38 (22 August 2019) [pdf, 266 KB]

    ...for similar conduct, in similar circumstances. The Tribunal should impose the least punitive penalty that is appropriate in the circumstances. While there is an element of punishment, rehabilitation is an important consideration.3 [11] Section 110(2) of the Act sets out the orders the Tribunal may make by way of penalty. As relevant to the present case the Tribunal may: [a] Make any of the orders that a Complaints Assessment Committee may impose under s 93 of the Act following a...