Search Results

1. Te Manutukutuku Issue 26 [pdf, 3.1 MB]

   ...Government actions); and .6. conceptual ('ownership' of natural resources). Historical claims may be divided to: .6. major claims (large tribal losses); and .6. specific claims (particular losses). THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL, Seabridge House, 110 Featherston Street, PO Box 5022, DX 8101, Wellington Tel (04) 499 3666 Fax (04) 4993676 Ii I I • The Tribunal groups historical claims by. districts for combined hearings and attaches the specific claims as ancillary to the ma...

2. [2020] NZREADT 19 - Singh - costs (1 May 2020) [pdf, 168 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2020] NZREADT 19 READT 019/19 IN THE MATTER OF An application for an award of costs under s 110A of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN SAGAR SINGH Applicant AND RAMJI GOVINDARAJAN Respondent On the papers Tribunal: Hon P J Andrews (Chairperson) Mr G Denley (Member) Ms C Sandelin (Member) Submissions filed by: Mr A J Woodhouse, on behalf of Mr Sin...

3. Annexure 4 - Water Quality [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...defined as the baseline state (NPSFM, 2020). The water quality analysed represented 10 physico-chemical and microbiological variables and biological indicators for 124 monitoring sites in the region. The sites included ORC monitored river sites (110), NIWA monitored National River Water Quality Network (NRWQN) sites (5) and ORC monitored lake sites (9 lakes, 22 sites/depths). While all variables were evaluated for state and trends at all sites (when sufficient data was available)...

4. Fair Pay Agreements Bill [pdf, 268 KB]

   ...chief executive must provide each bargaining party with the name of each other bargaining party for the proposed FPA, and cl 108 where bargaining parties must inform employers and employees about who is or is not covered by the proposed FPA. Clause 110 outlines the requirements for employers to notify employees who may be covered by the proposed FPA, and that the employee can elect not to have their details provided to the bargaining side. 14. These provisions prima facie limit the...

5. [2023] NZREADT 20 - CAC 2107 v Sheldon (Penalty) (14 August 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...entitled to expect from a reasonably competent licensee). PENALTY Jurisdiction and principles [9] The Tribunal’s jurisdiction to impose penalty orders where it finds that the licensee has engaged in unsatisfactory conduct is set out in s 110(4) of the Act, which provides for it to make any order that a Committee could make under s 93 (except under s 93(1)(ha)): 93 Power of Committee to make orders (1) If a Committee makes a determination under section 89(2)(b), the Commit...

6. 2023-05-22-Form-33-Prouse-Trust-K-S-Prouse.pdf [pdf, 429 KB]

   ...inadequate mitigation of road noise effects to our property. Apart from the road surface no additional noise mitigation has been proposed to address the noise effects of O2NL despite the designation boundary being only 65 metres from the homestead and 110 metres from road edge. This will be a significant new source of noise impacting both our indoor and outdoor amenity. No noise mitigation has been proposed despite statements by Waka Kotahi that the noise impacts will "be intrusiv...

7. [2023] NZREADT 13 - CAC v Sun (9 June 2023) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...schedules before each version of the ASPs was signed, in breach of rr 5.1 and 9.9 of the Rules. 6 JURISDICTION AND PRINCIPLES [23] The Tribunal’s jurisdiction to impose penalty orders if misconduct is proven is set out in the Act: 110 Determination of charges and orders that may be made if charge proved (1) If the Disciplinary Tribunal, after hearing any charge against a licensee, is satisfied that it has been proved on the balance of probabilities that the licensee h...

8. [2024] NZEnvC 160 Evans v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 276 KB]

   ...agreed that the Environment Court has jurisdiction to award costs in respect of 1 Evans v Marlborough District Council [2023] NZEnvC 048; Evans v Marlborough District Council [2023] NZEnvC 066; Evans v Marlborough District Council [2024] NZEnvC 110. 3 this proceeding under s285(1) Resource Management Act 1991 (‘RMA’). Moreover, the Council is willing to make a reasonable contribution to the applicant’s costs but only towards those incurred prior to the court’s interim...

9. Leef - Panguru A61B1 (2023) 267 Taitokerau MB 107 (267 TTK 107) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...provided that the family home and his interests in the land would go to Haimona. However, George never signed the will. Haimona now seeks an order that the house and land interests should go to him to honour their agreement. 267 Taitokerau MB 110 He aha te whānau e kōrero nei? What do the whānau say? [10] Most of Haimona’s whānau support this application. This includes his brothers Robert and Manukau, and George’s de facto partner, Hurimae Latimer. They deposed...

10. HL & NL v FL [2022] NZDT 280 (7 November 2022) [pdf, 292 KB]

    ...relates to an implement that was half owned by the partnership and half owned by SP personally. 109. SP’s participation in these proceedings is as a representative for FL. He is not a party to these proceedings. 45 panels of plywood 110. This part of the claim relates to timber that was retrieved from a truck accident near the property. There is a dispute about whether the timber was gifted to NL or to his brother. 111. Whatever the answer to that question, it is clear th...