Search Results

Search results for Craig.

814 items matching your search terms

  1. [2022] NZACC 52 - Sharp v ACC (1 April 2022) [pdf, 135 KB]

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2022] NZACC 52 ACR 147/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN CRAIG SHARP Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 23 November 2021 Held at: Rotorua/Rotorua-Nui-A-Kahumatamomoe Appearances: H Menneer for the appellant C Hlavac for the respondent Ju...

  2. Appendix-17-List-of-Submitters.pdf [pdf, 245 KB]

    ...Heard 50 Cher McCartney Oppose Oppose Oppose Not Specified Heard 51 Rebecca Wilson Oppose Oppose Oppose Oppose Not Heard 52 Roger Mcleay Support Support Support Support Not Specified 53 Lindsay Poutama Support Support Support Support Heard 54 Craig Nash Neutral Neutral Support Support Not Heard 55 Nicola Robinson Not Specified Not Specified Not Specified Not Specified Heard 56 Merie Cannon and Trevor Guy Neutral Oppose Neutral Oppose Not Specified 57 EJ Christiansen Support S...

  3. Body Corporate 85927, 38 Roxborough St v Wellington City Council [2010] NZWHT Wellington 12 [pdf, 203 KB]

    1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2008-101-000014-22 [2010] NZWHT WELLINGTON 12 BETWEEN BODY CORPORATE 85927 – 38 ROXBOROUGH STREET Claimants AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND CRAIG ALAN STEWART Second Respondent AND DAVID EDWARD STEWART Third Respondent AND ROB BONNER Fourth Respondent AND CAS MANAGEMENT LTD Fifth Respondent AND DESIGN NETWORK KAPITI LTD (Removed) Sixth Respondent AND MARK STEVENS Seventh Respondent...

  4. Warin - Whangaruru Whakaturia 4 Lot 32 DP 126453 (Part) 30 Taitokerau MB 37 (30 TTK 37) [pdf, 250 KB]

    ...– see s 130. That can only occur upon an application under s 135. [40] The right of first refusal under s 147A is indeed perpetual and is intended to be so. The rationale for that right is fully articulated by the Māori Appellate Court in Craig – Wainui 2F4D (paragraphs 16 to 20). The Court expressly confirmed the perpetual nature of the right – see paragraph 26. See also Hoko – Papamoa 2A1 (pp 183 to 184). The right does not dissolve on the first occasion it is not ta...

  5. Auckland District Law Society v Garnett [2009] NZLCDT 15 [pdf, 78 KB]

    ...15 LCDT 09/09 IN THE MATTER of the Law Practitioners Act 1982 BETWEEN AUCKLAND DISTRICT LAW SOCIETY Applicant AND EMMA JANE GARNETT Respondent CHAIR Judge D F Clarkson MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr G Craig Mr O Vaughan Ms C Rowe Mr B Smith HEARING at AUCKLAND on 5 October 2009 APPEARANCES Mr P Collins and M Treleaven for applicant Mr B Hart for respondent DECISION AS TO COSTS OF NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS...

  6. Wellington Standards Committee v Pine [2015] NZLCDT 24 [pdf, 73 KB]

    NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2015] NZLCDT 24 LCDT 006/15 BETWEEN WELLINGTON STANDARDS COMMITTEE 1 OF THE NEW ZEALAND LAW SOCIETY Applicant AND ANDREW CRAIG PINE Respondent Judge BJ Kendall (retired) CHAIR Mr M Gough MEMBERS OF TRIBUNAL Mr S Maling Mr A Marshall Mr K Raureti HEARING at Wellington Tribunals DATE 26 June 2015 DATE OF DECISION 15 July 2015 Mr S Kinsler and Mr P Arnold fo...

  7. [2021] NZEmpC 28 Juyi International Ltd v Pan [pdf, 198 KB]

    ...holiday pay. e) Did Juyi meet its obligations to Mr Pan regarding KiwiSaver? This application failed. f) Juyi was also ordered to reimburse Mr Pan for the filing fee paid, $71.56. 1 Pan v Juyi International Ltd [2020] NZERA 369 (Member Craig). The application for stay [5] Juyi’s application for stay was brought in the context of its non-de novo challenge as to the Authority’s finding about holiday pay. Juyi alleges, in summary, that the Authority erred in i...

  8. Te Whata v Sanson - Part Maungakawakawa 20 (2025) 288 Taitokerau MB 26 (288 TTK 126) [pdf, 211 KB]

    ...and 242, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Part Maungakawakawa 20 and Other I WAENGA I A Between PESSIMAN PEHIMANA TE WHATA AND TOKIKAPU TE WHATA Ngā kaitono Applicants ME And CRAIG SANSON AND DAVID BRIDGMAN Ngā kaiurupare Respondents Nohoanga: Hearing On the papers (Heard at Chambers) Whakataunga: Judgment date 24 March 2025 TE WHAKATAUNGA Ā KAIWHAKAWĀ M P ARMSTRONG Judgment...

  9. Te Whata - Waiwhatawhata 1A2B6 Lot 1 DP 168554 (2008) 125 Whangarei MB 294 (125 WH 294) [pdf, 3.4 MB]

    ...Waiariki Appellate MB 116; Nlillili M21 - 125 Whangarei MB 297 Ferris (2001) 34 APGS 52; Papamoa 2Al - Hoko (2003) 30 APWM 167; Orokawa 3B - Regeling [2004]6 APWH 157; Omahll 4C6 -D J Whitfield & Sons Limited (2004) 14 ACTK I; Wainlli 2F4D - Craig (2006) 7 APWH I and Ngarara West B3B - Property Ventures Limited (2007) 16 Whanganui Appellate Court I), the High COlili (Edwards v Maori Land COllrt of New Zealand, Ronald Young J, High Court, Wellington, CP78/01, II December 2001)...

  10. Evidence Brief: Family Violence Perpetrator Treatment [pdf, 341 KB]

    ...Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers’ treatment work? A meta-analytic review of family violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(8). Banks, J., Kini, S. & Babcock, J. (2013). Interventions that work to stop intimate partner violence. In Craig et al (eds). What Works in Offender Rehabilitation: An evidence-based approach to assessment and treatment. Wiley-Blackwell. Baker, G. (2010). What makes offender programmes effective? Wellington, New Zealand: Catholic Social Services....