Search Results

Search results for Craig.

814 items matching your search terms

  1. Tapsell - Lot 1 Owhatiura South 5 (2021) 257 Waiariki MB 176 (257 WAR 176) [pdf, 235 KB]

    ...[11] Counsel has outlined in submissions how the pre-conditions of s 136(a) – (c) and (e) of the Act have been met. However, there is a lack of information in terms of (d) as to whether the land can be better utilised as General land. [12] In Craig v Kira – Wainui 2F 4D the Māori Appellate Court considered that:5 those seeking a change under s 136 must show, using detailed evidence, that the land can be more effectively managed or utilised as General land. The applicant must pr...

  2. [2012] NZEmpC 88 NZ Air Line Pilots' Assn Inc v Air NZ Ltd [pdf, 156 KB]

    ...breakfast meal is “totally incorrect”. His evidence was that the claim was not advanced and that the rationale for its removal in 1992 remained intact – namely that a pilot should have his/her breakfast at home before coming to work. [33] Mr Craig is the flight crew manager at Air New Zealand. His evidence was that the plaintiff’s claim that the entitlement was negotiated, and agreed, as part of the 1999 collective is inconsistent with figures relating to the allowances...

  3. E36 Rebecca Skidmore - Urban Design - EIC - Council [pdf, 841 KB]

    ...drawing sets (urban design assessment figures9, LVA plans and visual simulations10, architectural drawing set11, concept engineering drawings DS1 to DS512); (h) The statements of evidence of: i. Russell Green (Emirates Team New Zealand)13; ii. Craig Jones (Event Legacy)14; iii. John Goodwin (Natural Character, Land scape and Visual Amenity)15; iv. Graeme McIndoe (Urban Design)16; and v. Karl Cook and Vijay Lala (Planning), including Attachment A: Proposed Conditions of Consen...

  4. Kemp - Otairi B2B (2010) 8 Taitokerau MB 216 (8 TTK 216) [pdf, 117 KB]

    ...of Māori Appellate Court decisions that change of status for the purpose of sale of land will rarely be justified – see White – Maketu A2A Lot 4 DPS 63036 (1999) 1 Waiariki Appellate MB 116 (1 AP 116) at [9], Hoko – Papamoa 2A1 at [18] and Craig v Kira – Wainui 2F4D (2006) 7 Taitokerau Appellate MB 1 at [24]. In short, such an approach subverts the 8 Taitokerau MB 223 kaupapa of the 1993 Act and undermines the protection of the preferred classes of alienees under...

  5. [2025] NZLVT 001 - Murray v Tasman District Council (28 January 2025) [pdf, 169 KB]

    ...LAND VALUATION TRIBUNAL _______________________________________________________________ A: Under s19(8)(b) of the Land Valuation Proceedings Act 1948, the Land Valuation Tribunal, by consent, orders that the valuation of the property at 96B Craigieburn Road, East Takaka as at 1 September 2023 is as follows: Capital value $830,000; Land value $470,000; Value of improvements $360,000. B: The agreed valuation is to be included in the relevant district valuation roll forthwit...

  6. 2023-10-11-Rebuttal-Evidence-of-L-Dalzell.pdf [pdf, 241 KB]

    ...both consider that DNV1 appropriately addresses the concerns around the modelling and the assumptions made within the modelling, and that addition noise protection at the road edge would not provide a meaningful reduction in noise. (b) Andrew Craig has adjusted the design of the Project to include two additional culverts that would convey overland flows in a 1 in 100 year flood event across the Ō2NL Project, i.e. from the east to the west. These two additional culverts reduce...

  7. Lipschitz v Auckland City Council [pdf, 13 KB]

    ...AND RODNEY GRAHAM PRATT Second Respondent AND GEOFFREY THOMAS WARD Third Respondent AND MARTIN KELLS Fourth Respondent AND CRAIG KELLS Fifth Respondent ___________________________________________________________________ PROCEDURAL ORDER NO 4 Dated 27 March 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ _______________

  8. List of parties as at 30 July 2021 [pdf, 722 KB]

    ...6140, cerridwen.bulow@buddlefindlay.com Interested Party S274 Waikato River Authority Paul Beverley, Buddle Findlay - Wellington, PO Box 2694, Wellington 6140, paul.beverley@buddlefindlay.com Interested Party S274 Waipa District Council Mr Craig Malone, Berry Simons Environmental Law, PO Box 3144, Auckland, craig@berrysimons.co.nz Interested Party S274 Waipa District Council Mr Simon Berry, PO Box 3144, Shortland Street, AUCKLAND, simon@berrysimons.co.nz Interested P...

  9. List of parties as at 13 July 2021 [pdf, 701 KB]

    ...6140, cerridwen.bulow@buddlefindlay.com Interested Party S274 Waikato River Authority Paul Beverley, Buddle Findlay - Wellington, PO Box 2694, Wellington 6140, paul.beverley@buddlefindlay.com Interested Party S274 Waipa District Council Mr Craig Malone, Berry Simons Environmental Law, PO Box 3144, Auckland, craig@berrysimons.co.nz Interested Party S274 Waipa District Council Mr Simon Berry, PO Box 3144, Shortland Street, AUCKLAND, simon@berrysimons.co.nz Interested P...

  10. List of parties as at 14 July 2021 [pdf, 700 KB]

    ...6140, cerridwen.bulow@buddlefindlay.com Interested Party S274 Waikato River Authority Paul Beverley, Buddle Findlay - Wellington, PO Box 2694, Wellington 6140, paul.beverley@buddlefindlay.com Interested Party S274 Waipa District Council Mr Craig Malone, Berry Simons Environmental Law, PO Box 3144, Auckland, craig@berrysimons.co.nz Interested Party S274 Waipa District Council Mr Simon Berry, PO Box 3144, Shortland Street, AUCKLAND, simon@berrysimons.co.nz Interested P...