Search Results

Search results for Environmental Design.

1701 items matching your search terms

  1. [2021] NZEnvC 060 Upper Clutha Environmental Society Incorporated v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 4.7 MB]

    ...CHRISTCHURCH I TE KOTI T AIAO O AOTEAROA KI OTAUTAHI IN THE l\tif\. TIER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 60 of the Resource 1'1anagement Act 1991 of appeals under clause 14 of the First Schedule of the Act UPPER CLUTHA ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIETY INCORPORATED (ENV-2018-CHC-056) and all other appellants concerning Topic 2 of Stage 1 of the Proposed Queenstown Lakes District Plan (listed on the attached schedule) Appellants QUEENSTO\'v'N LAKE...

  2. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 69 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 2.5 MB]

    TE RŌPŪ WHAKAMANA I TE TIRITI O WAITANGI Kohi-Tātea 2016 | January 2016 ISSUE 69 Kia puta ki te whai ao ki te ao mārama From the world of darkness moving into the world of light Te Manutukutuku 40 The Waitangi Tribunal Level 7, Fujitsu Tower 141 The Terrace Wellington New Zealand DX SX11237 Tel : 64 4 914 3000 Fax : 64 4 914 3001 www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Te Manutukutuku is produced and published by the Waitangi Tribunal Unit of the Ministry of Justice, and every effort has

  3. [2021] NZEnvC 136 The Canyon Vineyard Ltd v Central Otago District Council [pdf, 507 KB]

    THE CANYON VINEYARD LTD v CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL – INTERIM DECISION IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2021] NZEnvC 136 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under s120 of the Act BETWEEN THE CANYON VINEYARD LIMITED (ENV-2019-CHC-137) Appellant AND CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent AND BENDIGO STATION LIMITED Applicant Court: Environment Judge P A Steven En

  4. Kaupapa Maori responses to violence against wahine Maori [pdf, 965 KB]

    Kaupapa Māori responses to violence suffered by wāhine Māori 2019 1 Acknowledgments from Malatest International This report is based on in-depth interviews with kaiwhakahaere, kaiāwhina and kahukura who support whānau at very difficult times in their lives. We wish to thank all the participants for their candid discussion and for supporting this mahi. We also acknowledge that you made time to see us, even though your schedules were mor

  5. E50 Myfanwy Eaves - Historic Heritage - EIC - Council [pdf, 809 KB]

    ...(section 42). It is unlawful to modify, damage or destroy an archaeological site without prior authority from Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga. An Authority is required whether or not the land on which an archaeological site may be present is designated, a resource or building consent has been granted, or the activity is permitted under the Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part (November 2016). According to the Act (section 6) archaeological site means, subject to section 42(...

  6. E50 Myfanwy Eaves - Historic Heritage - EIC - Council V2 [pdf, 810 KB]

    ...(section 42). It is unlawful to modify, damage or destroy an archaeological site without prior authority from Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga. An Authority is required whether or not the land on which an archaeological site may be present is designated, a resource or building consent has been granted, or the activity is permitted under the Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part (November 2016). According to the Act (section 6) archaeological site means, subject to section 42(...

  7. E50 Myfanwy Eaves Historic Heritage EIC Council [pdf, 810 KB]

    ...(section 42). It is unlawful to modify, damage or destroy an archaeological site without prior authority from Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga. An Authority is required whether or not the land on which an archaeological site may be present is designated, a resource or building consent has been granted, or the activity is permitted under the Auckland Unitary Plan Operative in part (November 2016). According to the Act (section 6) archaeological site means, subject to section 42(...

  8. Joint Witness Statement Noise and Vibration 25 July 2018 [pdf, 3.5 MB]

    ...Wharf occupied by an activity sensitive to noise: lam to 11pm 65 dB LAeg 11pm to lam 55 dB LAeg 65 dB at 63 Hz Leg 1/1 Octave Band 60 dB at 125 Hz Leg 1/1 Octave Band 75 dB L AFmax 1940. Prior to the use of any distributed loudspeaker system designed for playing commentaries, interviews, promotional material or any other amplified sound to the public (excluding Noise Events)' the consent holder shall provide a report from a suitably qualified acoustics expert setting out su...

  9. Short v Stowers - Tumu Kaituna 14 (2018) 199 Waiariki MB 188 (199 WAR 188) [pdf, 335 KB]

    ...part of a title that has the status of Māori freehold land. He referred to s 4 of the Act, which defines “land” as either being Māori land, General land or Crown land, and it is implicit that “land” is held in a title with one of these designations. [26] Mr Sharp noted that past decisions of this Court have shown that if an owner of Māori freehold land wants to change the status of part of that land, the proper approach is to apply for a partition of those areas and when a...

  10. Hearn v Parklane Investments Limited [pdf, 178 KB]

    ...also pointed out that the claimants had no contract with EMPA. [11] Mr Sherwood-King on behalf of the claimant Trust opposed the application on the grounds that the bank is a significant issue. He submitted that Mr Blades was involved in the design stages of the house and on site during the dwelling’s construction, and so any removal would be premature. He cited the evidence of Mr Taylor, a chartered professional engineer, as the basis of the claim against EMPA. He also point...