Search Results

1. [2020] NZREADT 45 - Patel v Real Estate Agents Authority (22 September 2020) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...and the investigator about whether the video could be submitted to the Committee as part of the material it considered when dealing with the complaint. Mr Patel’s position apparently is that because of the limitations on the size of electronic files that could be emailed to the Authority, he was unable to submit the videos. There was a discussion about providing the material by the alternative means of transferring it onto a USB data stick. In our view that was a sensible suggest...

2. [2019] NZEmpC 189 McCook v Chief Executive of the Inland Revenue Department [pdf, 217 KB]

   ...evidence placed before the Court, some information relating to the employment of the plaintiffs is held by Madison and not IR. The Court is told that Madison has been directly involved in arranging for the plaintiffs to work at IR. On the evidence filed, it is a party having a role in the employment of the plaintiffs. [20] In all these circumstances I am satisfied that, as a matter of jurisdiction, the requirements of HCR 4.56(1)(b)(ii) are made out; Madison’s participation in t...

3. DU & HU c/- V Trust v UT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1591 (28 July 2021) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...of the Disputes Tribunal hearing there is no jurisdiction for the District Court to reach a finding different to that of the Referee. A Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have...

4. QL v OQ [2021] NZDT 1664 (22 June 2021) [pdf, 116 KB]

   ...of the Disputes Tribunal hearing there is no jurisdiction for the District Court to reach a finding different to that of the Referee. A Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 days if you have been granted an...

5. BX v FN Ltd [2018] NZDT 1505 (11 July 2018) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...A Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 28 days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside 28 days if you have been granted an extension of time by a District Court Judge. To apply for an extension of time you must file an Interlocutory Application on Notice and a supporting affidavi...

6. UO Ltd v BE [2021] NZDT 1511 (22 February 2021) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...of the Disputes Tribunal hearing there is no jurisdiction for the District Court to reach a finding different to that of the Referee. A Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside 20 days if you have been granted an ex...

7. OJ v KH [2020] NZDT 1534 (4 May 2020) [pdf, 190 KB]

   ...of the Disputes Tribunal hearing there is no jurisdiction for the District Court to reach a finding different to that of the Referee. A Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 28 days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside 28 days if you have been granted an ex...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 219 E Tū Inc v Rasier Operations BV [pdf, 231 KB]

   ...for plaintiffs G Service and S Howard-Brown, counsel for defendants Judgment: 9 December 2021 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS (Application for strike-out) Introduction [1] The plaintiffs have filed a claim on behalf of 12 named individuals. The claim is brought under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act). That provision confers exclusive jurisdiction on the Employment Court to make a declaration that an individua...

9. [2021] NZIACDT 24 - HT v Shaikh – Sanctions (7 October 2021) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...of the adviser [12] There are submissions (30 September 2021) from Mr Moses, counsel for Mr Shaikh. [13] Mr Moses says that Mr Shaikh accepts the Tribunal’s finding of a breach of the Code. He regrets his professional error in missing the filing deadline and apologises to the complainant. As the Tribunal had acknowledged in the earlier decision, Mr Shaikh had been forthright with the complainant and Immigration New Zealand. He had correctly and promptly assessed the complai...

10. BF v BN [2021] NZDT 1412 (1 April 2021) [pdf, 190 KB]

    ...of the Disputes Tribunal hearing there is no jurisdiction for the District Court to reach a finding different to that of the Referee. A Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 days if you have been granted an...