Search Results

1. Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand [2025] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 566 KB]

   ...Health New Zealand [2025] NZHRRT 10. Note publication restrictions. IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2025] NZHRRT 10 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA 2 [1] These proceedings under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994 were filed on 2 December 2024. Prior to the filing of the proceedings the parties resolved all matters in issue and the Tribunal is asked to make a consent declaration. The parties have filed: [1.1] A statement of claim dated 2 December 2024....

2. Director of Proceedings v Health New Zealand [2025] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 495 KB]

   (1) ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF NAME OR IDENTIFYING DETAILS OF THE AGGRIEVED PERSON (2) ORDER PREVENTING SEARCH OF THE TRIBUNAL FILE WITHOUT LEAVE OF THE CHAIRPERSON OR THE TRIBUNAL Reference No. HRRT 040/2024 UNDER THE HEALTH AND DISABILITY COMMISSIONER ACT 1994 BETWEEN DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS PLAINTIFF AND HEALTH NEW ZEALAND TE WHATU ORA DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr JS Hancock, Deputy Chairperson Mr IR Nemani, Member Ms DL Hart, Member...

3. [2024] NZEmpC 180 Danske Mobler v A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...concerned; or (ii) if RDP was not appropriate, calculate average daily pay (ADP) for these periods. (c) pay all current and past employees any arrears identified through those reviews and recalculations. [11] On 8 February 2022, Danske Møbler filed an Objection to the Improvement Notice in the Employment Relations Authority. The proceedings were removed to the Court by the Court, by special leave under s 178(3) of the Employment Relations Act on the basis there was an importan...

4. [2025] NZEmpC 126 Larsen v Fire and Emergency New Zealand  (judgment of Judge JC Holden, 26 June 2025 [pdf, 210 KB]

   ...Whangārei secondment in the interim was repeated. [23] FENZ also sought Mr Larsen’s agreement to FENZ, the NZPFU and Mr Larsen and his lawyer, all attending mediation together, but that offer was declined. Mr Mitchell advised that Mr Larsen would be filing a request for mediation, but only for mediation with FENZ. He said that Mr Larsen’s view was that he was not in dispute with the NZPFU and that he did not want to attend mediation with them. [24] A mediation between Mr Lar...

5. [2025] NZREADT 39 - QU & Ors v REAA (3 September 2025) [pdf, 259 KB]

   ...Code. 2. Mr Potter said he was working on the basis the property did comply. He saw the 2012 CCC and thought it was total Code compliance. It did not trigger that it was just for the recladding. He saw the CCC in the council’s property file, but did not go through the whole file. As there was a multi- offer situation, he discussed with the purchasers increasing their offer and removing conditions to make it more attractive to Flip Developments. They increased their offer a...

6. [2025] NZLVT 007 - Burney v Christchurch City Council (13 March 2025) [pdf, 287 KB]

   ...of value considerations, the SPFLR Zone means in terms of rights associated with residential occupation. 6 The Tribunal is not able to consider any revaluation objection prior to this current revaluation process if those objections were not filed in accordance with r 5 of the Rating Valuations Regulations 1998. 7 [15] Where owners accepted the Crown’s buy-out offer, the land was transferred to the respondent with the fee, that is the owner’s estate in the land (more often...

7. [2011] NZEmpC 109 Evolution E Business Limited v Smith [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...system and data bases to MarketSmart. Also on 18 December 2008 an application was made to the High Court for an interim injunction against both Evolution and MarketSmart pending the final determination of the proceeding. A lengthy affidavit was filed by Mr Norrie in support of the injunction application in which he deposed, inter alia, to having been contacted by a number of clients who had received letters from Evolution which stated that it had a new agreement for transaction...

8. Idea Services v Attorney-General (Interim Order Application) [2013] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...made by the solicitors for the plaintiff over a period of five months, Ms Coleman advised that a part-drafted MOH letter had awaited completion but the author had been overwhelmed by other commitments. She characterised as “extraordinary” the filing of the interim order application as a “reaction” to the Ministry’s silence. [6] I cannot agree with this characterisation. It is the Ministry’s silence which is extraordinary given that all the plaintiff wished to do was to eng...

9. Legal Complaints Review Officer v Hong [2013] NZLCDT 9 [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...3 Three particulars numbered 2.2 to 2.4 in the charge. 4 Five particulars numbered 2.5 to 2.9 in the charge. 5 One particular numbered 2.10 in the charge. 6 See affidavit of Owen William John Vaughan dated 11 September 2012 filed with the Tribunal in this matter, Exhibit “C”. 7 “As I am most concerned with the impact of the action on my good reputation, I am giving you the opportunity to have withdrawn immediately the action against me, failing wh...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 225 Davis v Idea Services Ltd [pdf, 368 KB]

    ...information which must be carefully analysed to assess the context of Ms Davis’ allegations. [60] I do not propose to record each and every adverse event with regard to the first half of 2016, other than to refer to a sequence of incident reports filed by or concerning Mr M, a support worker who cared for Mr A from time to time.15 [61] Mr M prepared five incident reports for the period 13 to 30 April 2016, in which he recorded Mr A as having been unusually aggressive, and where o...