Search Results

1. Criminal Procedure Act 2011: caseload performance for first 12 months [pdf, 672 KB]

   ...for criminal cases that more closely matches seriousness of offence (category 1, 2, 3 and 4 offences).  Enabling a move away from paper-based systems to using technology solutions, for example, all Police prosecutions are commenced by way of eFiled charging documents (system-to- system filing).  Improving case management processes, with prosecutors and defence counsel required to engage in out-of-court discussions to facilitate resolution of cases before a case review hearing is h...

2. [2015] NZEmpC 127 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 333 KB]

   ...challenging assertion of privilege and irrelevance in documents for disclosure BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By written submissions filed on 10, 14, 17, 21 and 23 July 2015 Appearances: MW O'Brien and B Nicholson, counsel for plaintiff C Meechan QC and J Douglas, counsel for defendant Judgment: 29 July 2015 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 16) O...

3. McAsey and Gill v Wellington 356 Committee APPEAL [2011] NZLCDT 41 [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...undue delay in the charges being prosecuted and brought to an hearing had rendered the proceedings an abuse of process. At the hearing of the application for stay Dr Stevens QC submitted that the period of concern related to the time elapsed from the filing of defence affidavits on 8 May 2009. [66] The 357 Committee, in its determination on the application for stay, found that the period from 8 May 2009 to the end of November 2009 was taken to enable the obtaining of a reply affidavi...

4. Nottingham & Property Bank Realtor Ltd v CAC 10057 & Honey [2014] NZREADT 80 [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...one http://www.martinhoney.co.nz/remlistings.php� http://www.martinhoney.co.nz/remcontactus.php� http://www.martinhoney.co.nz/� http://www.martinhoney.co.nz/� http://www.martinhoney.co.nz/� http://www.martinhoney.co.nz/� 6 text file to one particular folder location and one image file to one other folder location on the Pure Realty Ltd system. [22] As a result of the process described at [ix] above, it seems that the RE/Max pages were “updated” automatically with...

5. [2015] NZEmpC 104 Shanmuganathan v PowerNet Ltd [pdf, 235 KB]

   ...… 3 At the hearing of the challenge I made an order prohibiting publication of those parts of the psychologist’s report which are not referred to in this decision; and that the Court’s file should not be searched without leave of a Judge. To provide a positive context for such discussions, Mr Shanmuganathan’s contributions to the organisation should be acknowledged and affirmed. I suggested to him that just as P...

6. Nicholas v Kameta - Estate of Whakaahua Walker Kameta Te Puke 2A2A3B1 and 2A2A3B2 [2011] Māori Appellate Court MB 500 (2011 APPEAL 500) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...interpreted s108(4) of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 as to the meaning of spouse. 2. However, we accept that the children of Phyllis Nicholas are related by blood to the testator and are members of the hapū associated with the land. The appeal filed on behalf of the remaining appellants is allowed in that the orders of the Māori Land Court issued on 2 December 2009 concerning s108(2)(c) are annulled and substituted with the following orders: a) clause 4(d) of the deceased�...

7. Wall v The Maori Land Court - Tauhara Middle 15 Trust and Tauhara Middle 4A2A Trust [2010] 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 55 (2010 APPEAL 55) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...in favour of the Bank of New Zealand. [8] Applications were then brought before the Māori Land Court by the trustees of Tauhara 15. They sought a direction that they could by majority execute a mortgage in favour of the Bank of New Zealand and filed an application for the removal of Mr Karaitiana as a trustee. [9] In a reserved decision dated 29 June 2007, (85 TPO 225) (“first decision”), Judge Harvey directed that the trustees could by majority sign the mortgage 2010...

8. LCRO 136/2016 AB v DE and GH [pdf, 483 KB]

   ...sent the documents as she was still not happy with some of the provisions of the [Deed of Arrangement]”. Ms GH’s response [22] Ms GH states that when Mr DE left [Law Firm] in mid-July 2015 she met with him “to discuss the handover of the file”. In addition to Mr DE’s points she says that:7 Australian property (a) Upon the terms of the Deed of Arrangement having been finalised on 13 August 2015, she sent the transfer of the Australian property to Ms MN that day....

9. 2020-AKL-084 Fonterra Limited v Waikato Regional Council [pdf, 382 KB]

   ...trade competitor for the purposes of section 308D of the RMA Decision by Council 3. The Council’s decision ("Decision") was formally notified on 22 April 2020. 4. By its decision on an application for an extension of time to file appeals, the Environment Court directed at [87] that any appeal by certain parties, including Fonterra, must be filed within 50 working days of 28 April 2020 ([2020] NZEnvC 051, at [B]). Grounds for Appeal General grounds of...

10. [2020] NZREADT 31 – Turoa v Real Estate Agents Authority (30 July 2020) [pdf, 289 KB]

    ...AUTHORITY (CAC 519) First Respondent AND JANNA GILLIGAN and ROBERT MILLS Second Respondents On the papers Tribunal: Mr J Doogue (Deputy Chairperson) Ms C Sandelin (Member) Mr N O’Connor (Member) Submissions filed by: Ms M Mason on behalf of the Appellants Ms A-R Davies, on behalf of the Authority No submissions by or on behalf of the Second Respondents Date of Decision: 30 July 2020 ________________________________...