Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 138 Yee t/a Turangi Cabins & Holiday Park v Wallace [pdf, 53 KB]

   ...determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN YEE T/A TURANGI CABINS & HOLIDAY PARK Plaintiff AND TONY JAMES WALLACE AND KATHLEEN AGNES MARAEA HUDSON Defendants Hearing: (on the papers by way of memoranda filed 8 and 10 August 2012) Counsel: Bill Bevan, counsel for the plaintiff Graeme Ogilvie, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 13 August 2012 SUPPLEMENTARY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD [1] In my substantive judgment 1 date...

2. [2012] NZEmpC 2 Bourne and Ors v New Zealand Merchant Service Guild Industrial Union of workers Inc [pdf, 51 KB]

   ...Although the plaintiffs have been successful in their challenge, that has only been to a very limited extent. My preliminary view is that costs should lie where they fall. If any party wishes to seek an order for costs, however, a memorandum should be filed and served within 30 working days after the date of this judgment. The other parties will then have 20 working days in which to respond. [2] Ms Copeland filed submissions seeking an award of costs to the defendant. Mr Mc...

3. Kangsathien 7 April 2014 NZSHD 5 [pdf, 23 KB]

   ...AND PAWNBROKERS DECISION [1] Chaiwat KANGSATHIEN (“the applicant”) applied for an Individual Licence under s.8 of the Secondhand Dealers and Pawnbrokers Act 2004 (“the Act”) on 22 August 2013. [2] On 4 September 2013 the Police filed an Objection to this application with the Licensing Authority of Secondhand Dealers and Pawnbrokers (“the Authority”) under s.25 of the Act. [3] The basis of the Police Objection was that the applicant was currently facing a charg...

4. [2013] NZEmpC 110 Hall v Westpac NZ Ltd [pdf, 69 KB]

   ...Employment Relations Authority to the Employment Court AND IN THE MATTER of an application for costs BETWEEN GREGORY DOUGLAS HALL Applicant AND WESTPAC NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Respondent Hearing: By submissions filed on 24 May and 6 June 2013 Appearances: Tony Drake, counsel for applicant Phillipa Muir, counsel for respondent Judgment: 14 June 2013 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS [1] Costs were reserved in...

5. [2013] NZEmpC 156 Edwards v Anderson, Limited [pdf, 56 KB]

   ...form of an interlocutory judgment. [13] In the circumstances set out above, I adjourn the application, now for a more urgent hearing than that allocated in March 2014, to Monday 9 September 2013 at 9 am. I decline to abridge the time for the filing of a statement of defence except to the extent that this must be filed and served no later than 12 noon on Friday 6 September 2013, or 30 days after service of the statement of claim on the defendant, whichever is the earlier....

6. [2015] NZEmpC 11 Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v The Rail and Maritime Transport Union and Ors [pdf, 23 KB]

   ...were not "Cargo Handlers" was never viable. The proceeding was also in the nature of a test case. That is not, however, a final view and I am open to persuasion. If the Company wishes to seek an order for costs, a memorandum should be filed and served within 20 working days after the date of this decision. The defendants will then have 15 working days in which to respond. by saying [3] The Company subsequently did seek an award of costs and memoranda were filed by coun...

7. ADS v ZWI Ltd [2013] NZDT 220 (29 May 2013) [pdf, 55 KB]

   ...ZWI Ltd made several payments over time and made final payment on the two October invoices in January 2013. [4] ZWI Ltd has refused to pay the invoice for the additional glue of $1,265.00. ADS seeks payment of that amount plus the Tribunal filing fee. Issues [5] The issues for the Tribunal to determine are whether ADS was entitled to charge for the additional glue used on the job, or whether he is disentitled to payment because he said he would not charge...

8. Foldszin v CAC 20008 & Leef [2014] NZREADT 47 [pdf, 23 KB]

   ...address provided initially by the appellants rejected and cannot obtain a response to postal mail nor ascertain relevant phone numbers. [9] Mr Waymouth records that neither he nor Mr Clancy has been able to make contact with the appellants since they filed their appeal to us on 6 January 2014. He notes that the grounds of appeal are brief and, he puts it, “unsubstantiated”. He has also experienced that the email address supplied by the appellants simply records the failure of rece...

9. READT - Response to charge [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...no: For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals Real Estate Agents Disciplinary Tribunal Z Response to Charge What is this form for? Use this form to respond to any charge(s) laid by the Complaints Assessment Committee. You must file your response within 10 working days of receiving notice of the charge(s). Important Information 1. Please print in CAPITAL LETTERS. 2. You need to submit this application, by post or in person to the Real Estate Agents Disciplinary T...

10. Nicholls v Nicholls - Part Papaaroha 6B (2010) 2 Waikato Maniapoto MB 140 (2 WMN 140) [pdf, 781 KB]

    ...for an injunction for trespass against the respondents could not succeed. The applicants had sought to have the respondents removed from Lot 2, Lot 17 and the camping ground on the Part Papaaroha 6B block. [2] I gave parties ten working days to file submissions as to costs. Submissions were received from counsel for the respondents. seeking costs against the applicants. Submissions were subsequently filed by counsel for the applicants opposing an award of costs. 2 Waikato Mani...