Search Results

1. Costs & disbursements

   ...the unsuccessful party is to pay the successful party for costs. Disbursements In most cases, when a judge makes an order for disbursements they will order that the disbursements be fixed by the registrar. This means that when an order for sealing is filed with the registrar, the registrar will review the disbursements claimed by the successful party. If the registrar is satisfied with the disbursements claimed (and as long as the rest of the order is consistent with the order given in the judg...

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Going to court >
   3. Going to court without a lawyer >
   4. Representing yourself in a civil case in the District Court

2. 4.6 Filming, photographing and recording in court

   ...on the prescribed form with the registrar of the court in which the hearing is to take place. Applications need to be made to a specific court hearing, such as a first appearance, entry of plea, case review, trial or sentencing. Applications should be filed with the registrar of the court at least ten working days before the hearing is due to start, except in relation to a first appearance in a criminal matter. District Court and Coroners Court applications must be filed at least three working...

   Located in:

   1. About >
   2. News & media >
   3. Media centre >
   4. Media information >
   5. Media guide for reporting the courts and tribunals: Edition 4.1 >
   6. 4.0 Media in court

3. Compulsory substance addiction treatment

   ...treatment has been met. If it has been, the judge can: consider the review application immediately, or decide to hear the application at a review hearing.  The review hearing The review hearing will be held within 10 days of when the application was filed.  The patient must be at the hearing unless the court says they don’t have to be. If the patient is in a treatment centre, the hearing will probably take place via video link. If the patient is being treated in the community inst...

   Located in:

   1. Family >
   2. Court ordered treatment

4. [2010] NZEmpC 24 Tian v Hollywood Bakery (Holdings) Ltd [pdf, 31 KB]

   ...and that no undue hardship would be caused if substantial costs were awarded against her. [16] Mr Liu’s research referred to a property which the plaintiff had owned prior to the challenges on a mortgage free basis and noted that since the filing of the challenges the plaintiff had transferred that property into the name of a company. The property had a rating valuation of $505,000 and was transferred to that company for the consideration of that amount. Mr Liu observed that t...

5. Environment Court annual report 2005 [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...manage the caseload more effectively. However, as will be highlighted further in this report, there are number of future legislative and policy implications that may impact on the Court's work over the coming years. During the year 1086 cases were filed with the Court. The number of cases disposed was 1368 and the number of cases pending resolution now stands at 1566. This reduction in cases outstanding continues the downward trend in the Court's outstanding caseload which has deve...

6. Trustees of Aata Paora Keretene Ahu Whenua Trust v Cherrington - Motatau 3B2B3 (2015) 102 Taitokerau MB 43 (102 TTK 43) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...Whangarei) Appearances: Wayne Coutts, for the Applicant Judgment: 23 April 2015 ORAL JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M P ARMSTRONG 102 Taitokerau MB 44 Introduction [1] Applications have been filed by the trustees of the Aata Paora Keretene Ahu Whenua Trust seeking: a permanent injunction preventing Parata Cherrington from entering onto the Motatau 3B2B3 block; and to vary an order made by the Court on 29 September 2005 which...

7. L v O [2015] NZIACDT 81 (14 August 2015) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...using the adviser’s services. The responses The complainant [9] The complainant did not file a statement of reply, and was not required to do so if she agreed with the contents of the Statement of Complaint. The adviser [10] The adviser filed a statement of reply and an affidavit. The Tribunal issued a direction. It noted that the adviser’s response was undisputed, and provided the Registrar with an opportunity to file any evidence in reply, and apply for an oral hearing to cro...

8. Smith v The Māori Trustee - Waipaoa 5A2 (2014) 44 Tairawhiti MB 104 (44 TRW 104) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...In 1965, Francis Charles Murray Smith transferred his half share in the lease to Francis Guthrie Smith, as sole tenant. 3.6 In 1977, Francis Guthrie Smith acquired 983.166 shares in Waipaoa 5A2 from the Crown for the purchase price of $48,200. A file note by Mr Joe Paenga dated 3 December 1976, stated the above named came into this block by buying his brothers – George Paul Smith. George Paul Smith purchased Herehere Hakiaha shares in Tuahu 3D1. She owned half of the block (WR52/2...

9. Webster - Komakorau Parish of 146B1A (Hukanui Marae) (2012) 42 Waikato Maniapoto MB 83 (42 WMN 83) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S TE A MILROY Copy to: Diana Christine Webster, P O Box 7507, Auckland 1141 42 Waikato Maniapoto MB 84 [1] Diana Christine Webster (“the applicant”) filed an application on 10 April 2012 asking for an urgent inquiry into the administration of a Māori reservation being Komakorau Parish of 146B1A (Hukanui Marae) pursuant to reg 21 of the Māori Reservation Regulations 1994. The applica...

10. Auckland Standards Committee v Holland [2014] NZLCDT 13 [pdf, 138 KB]

    ...APPEARANCES Mr M Hodge for the Standards Committee Mr C Morris for the Practitioner 2 DECISION OF NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL (ON PENALTY) Introduction [1] Two sets of charges have been filed against Mr Holland. Five charges were laid in July 2013 and a further two charges in January 2014. The full set of charges are set out in the appendix to this decision. [2] Charge 4 of the first set of charges was withdrawn by leave...