Search Results

1. Wellington Standards Committee 2 v O'Connor [2023] NZLCDT 25 (9 June 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...with the disciplinary process [34] Although Ms Pender asks us to treat this as an aggravating feature, it is probably better expressed as the lack of a mitigatory factor. There is no doubt that Mr O’Connor repeatedly breached directions for filing of his evidence and indeed never filed a formal response to the charges. We do not accept Mr Paine’s submission that the multiple 13 New Zealand Law Society v Stanley [2021] NZLR 50, at [42]. 9 breaches were primarily th...

2. LCRO 187/2022 JP Limited v YG (6 June 2024) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...forwarding unnecessary correspondence to the LCRO. • the desirability of bringing closure to these proceedings. [28] The Review Officer ordered Mr JK to pay the sum of $500 towards the costs of the review. [29] I have not been able to compare the file in that review with this file, but I endorse the description of JP’s complaints by [Law firm 1], when they say:6 This complaint has been ongoing for nearly 3 years, during which JP has continuously filed extraordinarily lengthy, ver...

3. [2024] NZEnvC 158 Auckland Council v Eco Earth Limited [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...[2] Within 10 working days, complete the following site stability works (site stability works): [2.1] Batter back the current fill profile, on the southern, western and eastern slopes, from the toe of the current near-vertical face. The re-profiled fill surface should be: [2.1.1] At a profile of not steeper than 1V:3H, [2.1.2] Well rolled/sealed to reduce infiltration. [2.2] Install appropriate surface water drainage to channel surface water away from the batter slope and neigh...

4. [2024] NZEmpC 129 Carrington v Roy [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...unjustifiably disadvantaged Ms Roy by suspending her without pay from 25 to 30 April 2022. (d) Carrington Resort unjustifiably constructively dismissed Ms Roy from her employment on 30 April 2022. [3] Remedies were ordered.2 [4] Carrington Resort filed a de novo challenge to the Authority’s substantive determination. It also filed a challenge to the Authority’s costs determination in which Carrington Resort was ordered to pay Ms Roy a total of $8,209.04 towards her costs...

5. [2024] NZIACDT 02 - NS v Registrar (8 January 2024) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...http://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2007/0015/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM407351#DLM407351 http://legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2007/0015/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM407351#DLM407351 7 (c) determine that it should hear the complaint, and direct the Registrar to prepare the complaint for filing with the Tribunal; or (d) determine that the Registrar should make a request under section 45(1)(d). [29] The adviser against whom the complaint is made is not a party to the appeal and has not been...

6. Zhang v Samsung Electronics New Zealand Ltd (Strike Out Application) [2023] NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...this ground. 4 [13.2] The claim is frivolous or vexatious and is not brought in good faith; and/or [13.3] The case is an abuse of the Tribunal’s processes. [14] The application also relied on the affidavit from Mr Peacocke, which was filed in support of the strike out application. In that affidavit Mr Peacocke said that Mr Zhang had not consented to Samsung testing his phone, but it had tested the same model of phone, which did not demonstrate the same functionality issu...

7. KK & PM v S Ltd & SH Ltd [2023] NZDT 43 (23 January 2023) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...respondent because they received a letter from XM with a response to their claim and advising that it represented its client [SH Ltd]”. KK said he added SH Ltd as it was the respondent as identified by S Ltd’s lawyers and he did not want to have filed against the incorrect respondent and so named them both. 8. Both parties agree that the contract was with S Ltd and that it is the correct respondent in these proceedings. Was the report prepared using reasonable care and skill...

8. OIA-119562.pdf [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...• Property (Relationships) Act 1976 • Any other matters under the jurisdiction of the Family Court For each of the above categories, I seek the following information: Appeals from Family Court to the High Court: • The total number of appeals filed in the High Court • The number of appeals heard • The number and percentage of successful appeals • The number and percentage of unsuccessful appeals Judicial Reviews from Family Court to the High Court: • The total number of jud...

9. B Ltd v JD [2024] NZDT 285 (7 March 2024) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...progress the project is through no fault of B Ltd. JD, it appears in consultation with his family and M Ltd, have made a decision to not do any more work on this project at the present time. 59. OL was unable to confirm at the time of hearing what files and design plans may still be available but if such documents and details are available, they can be supplied to JD upon payment of the amount as ordered by the Tribunal. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 6 of 7 60. JD submi...

10. [2024] NZIACDT 29 INZ v Li (6 December 2024) [pdf, 253 KB]

    ...Immigration NZ, based on an offer of employment from the employer. She noted on the form that she was the immigration adviser who had completed the form and who had provided immigration advice to the client. Ms Li then sent an email to MQ reporting the filing of the visa application. [12] On 21 August 2023, Immigration NZ granted the visa for three years. It was subject to the condition that the client work for the employer as a car groomer. On the same day, Ms Li informed MQ of...