Search Results

1. Wall v The Maori Land Court - Tauhara Middle 15 Trust and Tauhara Middle 4A2A Trust [2010] 2010 Maori Appellate Court MB 55 (2010 APPEAL 55) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...in favour of the Bank of New Zealand. [8] Applications were then brought before the Māori Land Court by the trustees of Tauhara 15. They sought a direction that they could by majority execute a mortgage in favour of the Bank of New Zealand and filed an application for the removal of Mr Karaitiana as a trustee. [9] In a reserved decision dated 29 June 2007, (85 TPO 225) (“first decision”), Judge Harvey directed that the trustees could by majority sign the mortgage 2010...

2. LCRO 136/2016 AB v DE and GH [pdf, 483 KB]

   ...sent the documents as she was still not happy with some of the provisions of the [Deed of Arrangement]”. Ms GH’s response [22] Ms GH states that when Mr DE left [Law Firm] in mid-July 2015 she met with him “to discuss the handover of the file”. In addition to Mr DE’s points she says that:7 Australian property (a) Upon the terms of the Deed of Arrangement having been finalised on 13 August 2015, she sent the transfer of the Australian property to Ms MN that day....

3. 2020-AKL-084 Fonterra Limited v Waikato Regional Council [pdf, 382 KB]

   ...trade competitor for the purposes of section 308D of the RMA Decision by Council 3. The Council’s decision ("Decision") was formally notified on 22 April 2020. 4. By its decision on an application for an extension of time to file appeals, the Environment Court directed at [87] that any appeal by certain parties, including Fonterra, must be filed within 50 working days of 28 April 2020 ([2020] NZEnvC 051, at [B]). Grounds for Appeal General grounds of...

4. [2020] NZREADT 31 – Turoa v Real Estate Agents Authority (30 July 2020) [pdf, 289 KB]

   ...AUTHORITY (CAC 519) First Respondent AND JANNA GILLIGAN and ROBERT MILLS Second Respondents On the papers Tribunal: Mr J Doogue (Deputy Chairperson) Ms C Sandelin (Member) Mr N O’Connor (Member) Submissions filed by: Ms M Mason on behalf of the Appellants Ms A-R Davies, on behalf of the Authority No submissions by or on behalf of the Second Respondents Date of Decision: 30 July 2020 ________________________________...

5. [2023] NZEnvC 079 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated v Dunedin City Council [pdf, 456 KB]

   ...to that jurisdictional scope issue and secondly, as it was raised at the hearing, as to the possible use of the court’s jurisdiction under s293. [14] Following the conclusion of the hearing, a consent memorandum and draft consent order were filed with the court to give effect to the settlement reached on the amendments to policies in Chapter 10. However, as the use of the court’s s293 jurisdiction had been proposed by the appellant a decision on whether that 7 jurisdiction...

6. [2024] NZEnvC 029 New Zealand Motor Caravan Association Inc v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 2.9 MB]

   ...Zone Development Levv Catchment Number of Development Total DIC Household Contribution (incl) Equivalent Units per HEU (incl) IHEUs\ Subtotal Zone Development Levies (incl) Additional Development Levv (Aooendix 3, c lause (nil Description File Reference Total D/C (incl) Subtotal Additional Development Levies (incl) Total Develo ment Contribution Levies for the services itemised incl $3196.00 GST Content $416.87 Total Development Contributions $3196.00 Important Notes: 1. Th...

7. [2024] NZREADT 32 – JX v CAC2201 & Baker (13 September 2024) [pdf, 265 KB]

   ...she did not have any particular knowledge of the property prior to listing other than as a casual visitor. The Committee was satisfied that the questions put to the vendor by the licensee, coupled with the licensee’s review of the council file, indicated that she took appropriate steps to ascertain whether there were any known defects or unconsented work at the property. It was the licensee’s evidence that other than a site meeting with the builder and project manager at the...

8. C Ltd v CZ [2024] NZDT 779 (11 November 2024) [pdf, 387 KB]

   ...14. C Ltd put [the Trust] on a “stop credit” and did not do any more work. 15. The Trust engaged lawyers as did C Ltd in response. Various proposals were made to attempt to resolve the matter, but they were not successful. 16. C Ltd filed a claim in the Disputes Tribunal for $30,000.00. C Ltd stated that its claim was for unpaid invoices of $50,882.73. There were also two invoices C Ltd had not issued for the entrance unit of $9,124.24 and the benchtops of $9,200.00. C Ltd a...

9. Final Report of the Independent Panel - Word [docx, 11 MB]

   ...guardianship, family violence, care and protection, relationship property, and spousal and child support. These applications are considered by many different judges, frequently without access to the full history of the case. Having one judge case manage a file ensures consistency and familiarity, and is likely to promote better judicial decision making. Similarly, it was suggested that having one judge manage all Family Court and, where relevant, criminal matters regarding a family, is likely t...

10. Te Korowai Ture ā-Whānau: The final report of the Independent Panel examining the 2014 family justice reforms [pdf, 1.3 MB]

    ...guardianship, family violence, care and protection, relationship property, and spousal and child support. These applications are considered by many different judges, frequently without access to the full history of the case. Having one judge case manage a file ensures consistency and familiarity, and is likely to promote better judicial decision making. Similarly, it was suggested that having one judge manage all Family Court and, where relevant, criminal matters regarding a family, i...