Search Results

1. Trustees of Aata Paora Keretene Ahu Whenua Trust v Cherrington - Motatau 3B2B3 (2015) 102 Taitokerau MB 43 (102 TTK 43) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...Whangarei) Appearances: Wayne Coutts, for the Applicant Judgment: 23 April 2015 ORAL JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M P ARMSTRONG 102 Taitokerau MB 44 Introduction [1] Applications have been filed by the trustees of the Aata Paora Keretene Ahu Whenua Trust seeking: a permanent injunction preventing Parata Cherrington from entering onto the Motatau 3B2B3 block; and to vary an order made by the Court on 29 September 2005 which...

2. L v O [2015] NZIACDT 81 (14 August 2015) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...using the adviser’s services. The responses The complainant [9] The complainant did not file a statement of reply, and was not required to do so if she agreed with the contents of the Statement of Complaint. The adviser [10] The adviser filed a statement of reply and an affidavit. The Tribunal issued a direction. It noted that the adviser’s response was undisputed, and provided the Registrar with an opportunity to file any evidence in reply, and apply for an oral hearing to cro...

3. Smith v The Māori Trustee - Waipaoa 5A2 (2014) 44 Tairawhiti MB 104 (44 TRW 104) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...In 1965, Francis Charles Murray Smith transferred his half share in the lease to Francis Guthrie Smith, as sole tenant. 3.6 In 1977, Francis Guthrie Smith acquired 983.166 shares in Waipaoa 5A2 from the Crown for the purchase price of $48,200. A file note by Mr Joe Paenga dated 3 December 1976, stated the above named came into this block by buying his brothers – George Paul Smith. George Paul Smith purchased Herehere Hakiaha shares in Tuahu 3D1. She owned half of the block (WR52/2...

4. Webster - Komakorau Parish of 146B1A (Hukanui Marae) (2012) 42 Waikato Maniapoto MB 83 (42 WMN 83) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE S TE A MILROY Copy to: Diana Christine Webster, P O Box 7507, Auckland 1141 42 Waikato Maniapoto MB 84 [1] Diana Christine Webster (“the applicant”) filed an application on 10 April 2012 asking for an urgent inquiry into the administration of a Māori reservation being Komakorau Parish of 146B1A (Hukanui Marae) pursuant to reg 21 of the Māori Reservation Regulations 1994. The applica...

5. Auckland Standards Committee v Holland [2014] NZLCDT 13 [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...APPEARANCES Mr M Hodge for the Standards Committee Mr C Morris for the Practitioner 2 DECISION OF NEW ZEALAND LAWYERS AND CONVEYANCERS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL (ON PENALTY) Introduction [1] Two sets of charges have been filed against Mr Holland. Five charges were laid in July 2013 and a further two charges in January 2014. The full set of charges are set out in the appendix to this decision. [2] Charge 4 of the first set of charges was withdrawn by leave...

6. Auckland District Law Society v Mathias [2010] NZLCDT 10 [pdf, 42 KB]

   ...in an informal way would be present at the hearing. That did not pose a difficulty because at an early stage Mr Mathias admitted each of the 13 charges faced by him and before the Tribunal for consideration at this hearing. Mr Mathias had also filed a written submission appending some medical reports for the Tribunal’s consideration at the sanctioning hearing. He indicated in his response to the charges that he not only saw strike off as an inevitable outcome of the hearing but...

7. [2017] NZEnvC 166 Clarence Harvest Ltd v Waimakariri District Council [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   ...Management Act 1991, the Environment Court orders that Clarence Harvest Limited is to pay Brendan and Angelique Glubb $4,000.00. B: Under section 286 of the Act this Court names the District Court at Christchurch as the court this order may be filed in for enforcement purposes (if necessary). CLARENCE HARVEST LlMTIED V WDC & OTHERS - COSTS DECISION OCTOBER 2017 Introduction 2 REASONS [1] This proceeding concerns an appeal by Clarence Harvest Limited against a decision...

8. DN v EO LCRO 263/2013 (31 August 2015) [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...inappropriate for Mr EO to have 2 disclosed information that was personal to Mr DN, which had come into Mr EO’s possession only because of his involvement in NZLS. Standards Committee process [5] There is no evidence on the Standards Committee file of NZLS sending Mr DN’s complaint to Mr EO, of Mr EO being invited to respond, or of him providing any response in the course of the Committee’s process. [6] The Committee considered the complaint, which included Mr EO’s...

9. AH v ZS LCRO 90 / 2010 (10 February 2011) [pdf, 79 KB]

   ...obtaining the documents and information from the Respondent. [12] It must be noted at this stage that the Standards Committee made no specific reference to the complaint concerning “controlled money transactions” and I am unable to discern from the file exactly what the Applicant is referring to in this regard. Consequently, this aspect of the complaint has not been considered by me, but in the overall context of the complaint, I consider that this does not affect the outcome of...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 35 Ahuja and Others v Labour Inspector [pdf, 336 KB]

    ...KHOOBSURAT COLLECTIONS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) AND NEELAM AHUJA AND CHIRAG AHUJA Third Plaintiffs AND A LABOUR INSPECTOR, MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT Defendant Hearing: On written submissions filed on 15 and 21 March 2017 Appearances: G Bennett and C Bowdler, advocates for plaintiffs M Urlich, counsel for defendant P Gunn and G Taylor, counsel for Employment Relations Authority (appearing by leave) Judgment: 3...