Search Results

1. Hunia v New Zealand Police [2021] NZHRRT 12 [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...compared with IPP 10 and s 24 of PA 2020 are not material. [14] In this decision the provisions of the 2020 Act will be referred to unless otherwise expressly indicated. Discontinuance by the second plaintiff [15] When these proceedings were first filed the New Zealand Police Association Inc (NZPA) was named as second plaintiff and no objection was taken by the Police. [16] However, it was Sergeant Hunia alone who filed the complaint with the Privacy Commissioner and at the heari...

2. Booth v Herlihy - Waikoukoutauanui 6B 6C and 6DB [2020] Chief Judges MB 632 (2020 CJ 632) [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...trustees to replace the deceased trustee and then made an order varying the terms of trust over the 6B Block only, the application was adjourned to the next Court sitting for the other two blocks. 47 Wairarapa MB 20 (15 August 1991) 7. The Registrar filed an application to the Māori Land Court pursuant to sections 438(1), (2A) of the Māori Affairs Act 1953 and section 438(5) of the Māori Affairs Act 1953 to appoint trustees and to establish a trust over the Waikoukoutauanui 6C Bl...

3. National Standards Committee 2 v Harker [2020] NZLCDT 27 (31 August 2020) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...4 identification. To maintain consistency, we shall make a similar order. There is no public interest in publication of this detail.9 [9] For those reasons, we make permanent orders: [a] Prohibiting access to the psychological reports filed in the Tribunal and prohibiting publication of any information derived from them. [b] Prohibiting publication of the name and any identifying particulars of Mr Harker’s employer. [10] For the avoidance of doubt, we have written thi...

4. [2019] NZEmpC 193 Ikundabose v McWatt Group Ltd [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN ELIYA IKUNDABOSE Plaintiff AND MCWATT GROUP LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 27 and 28 June 2019, written submissions filed on 18 July 2019, 1 and 8 August 2019 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: E Ikundabose, plaintiff in person P M Howard-Smith, counsel for defendant Judgment: 18 December 2019 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS I...

5. KU & UE v TQ Ltd [2021] NZDT 1649 (28 October 2021) [pdf, 292 KB]

   ...of the Disputes Tribunal hearing there is no jurisdiction for the District Court to reach a finding different to that of the Referee. A Notice of Appeal may be obtained from the Ministry of Justice, Disputes Tribunal website. The Notice must be filed at the District Court of which the Tribunal that made the decision is a division, within 20 working days of the decision having been made. There is a $200 filing fee for an appeal. You can only appeal outside of 20 working days if you have...

6. [2021] NZACC 122 - Nelson v ACC (3 August 2021) [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...March 2018, the Corporation advised Mr Nelson that his weekly compensation would be reinstated from 15 August 2017, being the date that the Corporation first received notification that his injury had deteriorated. [62] On 29 March 2018, Mr Nelson filed an application for review against the 28 March 2018 decision. The application indicated that Mr Nelson was seeking an earlier date for reinstatement. [63] On 31 July 2018, a late review application was filed against the Corporation&#...

7. 2023 NZPSPLA 036.pdf [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...the appropriate certificates of approval. [18] Mr Dean advised CIPU that from that time on all security guards had appropriate certificates of approval. However, this is not correct as the two security guards for which 2 CIPU Investigation File Document 00029 page 36 4 CIPU obtained more detailed information worked in security for several months without COAs. • Security Guard A was employed by Visions on 1 July 2021 and continued to work in a security role until 6...

8. LCRO 148/2022 NH v MV (13 June 2024) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...NH advised Mr MV that she was under the impression that [Law firm 1] would be holding the Retention and not [Law firm 2] as provided for in the Agreement. [12] A telephone conversation between Ms NH, Mr MV and Ms HP then took place. Ms HP’s file note of that conversation reads: Bond – OK to 200k to be held by [LF1].4 [Law firm 2] wants letter to record basis Bond to be held + released. Reviewed SPA terms with (NH). (NH) OK – said will get CCC. Reminded (NH) if not get CCC...

9. [2024] NZEnvC 253 Karmarkar v Auckland Council [pdf, 263 KB]

   ...and abatement notice number ABC 21725984 issued to Madhav Karmarkar is confirmed. B: Abatement notice number ABC 21725984 is stayed for 28 days following the date of issue of this decision. 2 C: Costs are reserved. Any application must be filed and served within 10 working days of the date of this decision, with any response to be filed and served within 10 working days of the date of that application. REASONS Introduction [1] This matter relates to an appeal against an a...

10. LCRO 158/2024 USP v FTC (30 June 2025) [pdf, 524 KB]

    ...breaches established were in the “moderate range”, and that there were very few mitigating factors to take into consideration. [37] A fine of $7,000 was imposed, together with a costs order of $1,000. Application for review [38] Mr USP filed an application for review on 23 December 2024. [39] He submits that: (a) although the Standards Committee had determined that Mr FTC’s conduct had, in many respects, been seriously neglectful, these failings had carried little conseq...