Search Results

1. Rautahi - Kaitoki 2C2B (2004) 178 Napier MB 26 (178 NA 26) [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   ...Subject: Kaitoki 2C2B - Application for a Status Order declaring general land to be Maori freehold land Section: 133/93 Applicant: Wales Tu Rautahi RESERVED DECISION The Application 1. On 26 March 2004 Wales Tu Rautahi ("the applicant") filed an application pursuant to section 133/93 to change the status of Kaitoki 2C2B from general land to Maori freehold land. 2. The application came before the Court on 7 May 2004 (176 NA 75) and 2 July 2004 (176 NA 239), but was adjo...

2. MG v Hu [2019] NZIACDT 33 (17 May 2019) [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...and office supplies business. [11] The complainant then terminated the agreement with Ms Hu and instructed a new immigration adviser. [12] The new adviser advised Immigration New Zealand in November 2013 that the LTBV application previously filed may have contained some incorrect information. He alleged that the complainant had never seen the first business proposal, that some of the documents had been signed by Ms H and that none of the information on the application form had...

3. K v I [2018] NZIACDT 22 (18 June 2018) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...an EOI for residency to INZ on his behalf. The Complainant paid the Adviser an instalment of $2,255 for his services. The Complainant claimed he did not sign or receive a written agreement from the Adviser. The Adviser did not submit a client file or any further evidence to the Authority that disproved the Complainant's claim. By failing to ensure that a written agreement was provided to the Complainant once he decided to proceed, it appears the Adviser did not meet his obli...

4. LCRO 71/2016 ZB v YA (23 August 2018) [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...themselves once the actual activity was discovered, rather than simply resigning his responsibilities in the lessee company and walking away. [9] Mr ZB attached various documents to his complaint, including a statement of claim and supporting affidavit filed in a High Court proceeding seeking an injunction restraining the defendants, which included Mr YA and the company, from operating a [GH 3 business] or any other [GH business]-related activity from the apartment, and compensat...

5. [2021] NZEnvC 035 The New Zealand Refining Company Limited v Whangarei District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   ...Agency remains extant. E: The Strategic Policy - Regionally Significant Infrastructure topic is resolved. F: Under section 285 of the Act there is no order as to costs. REASONS Introduction [1] This determination results from a consent memoranda filed by the parties in relation to the appeals by The New Zealand Refining Company Limited (Refining NZ) and the New Zealand Transport Agency (Waka Kotahi). [2] On 20 November 2020, a consent memorandum and draft consent documents wer...

6. [2021] NZACC 3 - Judkins v ACC (5 January 2021) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...decision, or the evidence upon which it was based (including the VIMA by Dr Walls) was flawed. [6] In September 2012, Mr Judkins suffered injuries to his arm, back, hip and thigh. [7] On 21 November 2012, Mr Brick, Mr Judkins’ treating surgeon, filed an Assessment Report and Treatment Plan (“ARTP”), claiming further arthroscopic surgery on the left side. The ARTP suggested that Mr Judkins’ symptoms had settled following the last surgery, which was in September 2011, but t...

7. Panapa - Ngawhare rāua ko Merepapuha Raukura Maika Te Rangipuawhe Whānau Trust (2017) 159 Waiariki MB 277 (159 WAR 277) [pdf, 228 KB]

   ...combine their parents’ interests; amalgamating the trusts mentioned above to create the Ngawhare rāua ko Merepapuha Raukura Maika Te Rangipuawhe whānau trust. 4 1 The application was filed by Taimona Panapa on behalf of the Frank and Ngarangimihi Maika whānau trust. 2 221 Rotorua MB 158 (221 ROT 158). See also 6 Registrar’s MB 338 (6 REG 338). 3 273 Rotorua MB 17-23 (273 ROT 17-23). 4 289 Rotorua MB 45-49 (289...

8. [2017] NZEmpC 47 Singh v Trustees of the Wellington Rudolf Steiner Kindergarten Trust [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...proceeding by virtue of execution of the settlement. In the determination dated 3 June 2016, the Authority upheld the defences raised by the Trust and concluded that Ms Singh was therefore precluded from pursuing her claims in the Authority. She has filed a challenge to that determination, seeking a hearing de novo. Pleadings [5] The original statement of claim filed on behalf of Ms Singh contained considerable detail as to the factual background to the dispute. If the Cour...

9. Kidwell v Karaitiana - Waipuka 3A3A(2019)78 Tākitimu MB 7 (78 TKT 7) [pdf, 272 KB]

   ...Zealand.1 The block was was created by partition order on 23 November 1906.2 On 25 November 1970, a declaration was issued per to s 6 of the Māori Affairs Amendment Act 1967, that the land shall cease to be Māori land. [5] Applications were filed in 2012 and 2016, seeking to constitute a formal management structure over the land. However, at a meeting of owners held in 2017, a motion was passed to appoint agents to act on behalf of the owners for limited purposes. Charmaine Hea...

10. [2019] NZEnvC 162 Linnell v Hastings District Council [pdf, 378 KB]

    ...visual effects and planning matters. It also supplied accounts from the months of April and May 2019 that relate to: 13 14 (a) Legal attendances following receipt of the Court's directions issued on 14 March 2019 and the preparation and filing of the 3 April memorandum prior to the pre-hearing conference; (b) Attendance at the pre-hearing conference in Napier; and (c) Subsequent attendances in respect of further memoranda and the review, finalisation and exchange of exper...