Search Results

1. Wai 2180 Taihape inquiry newsletter 3 June 2016 [pdf, 1 MB]

   ...Māori land retention and alienation Craig Innes WTU #A15 Māori in the Taihape inquiry district: a sociodemographic scoping exercise Georgie Craw WTU #A28 In directions released earlier this year, the Tribunal granted an extension to the filing date of CFRT research to 20 May 2016. Staff are very pleased to announce that all research has been completed in the CFRT research programme. We extend thanks to the researchers who committed to this final deadline despite the minor del...

2. ST v CBU LCRO 125 / 2011 (10 December 2012) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...paid by order of the Court and reiterated his complaint that …the basic falsehood from [CBU] was their claim to be entitled to payment in circumstances where they had received no instructions, had no retainer and had not done any work. They filed application papers in the High Court in support of their false claims! [22] The Standards Committee determination was communicated to the parties on 30 May 2011. It determined that CBU had issued its invoices and winding-up applica...

3. Chung and Lok v Yap [2014] NZIACDT 66 (30 May 2014) [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...adviser breached the Code of Conduct as he did not properly evaluate the complainant’s immigration prospects and his delivery of services through unlicensed staff breached his professional duties. The Statement of Complaint [8] The Registrar filed a statement of complaint. It says the complainants lodged the complaint on wider grounds, but the Registrar identified material that supports the following grounds of complaint: [8.1] He breached clauses 2.1(b) and 3 of the Code in relati...

4. Chaudhary v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 414) NZREADT 12 [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...[40] The complaint by Mr Rajan and Mrs Devi is remitted back to the Committee for consideration. [41] Pursuant to s 113 of the Act, the Tribunal draws the parties’ attention to s 116 of the Act, which sets out appeal rights. Any appeal must be filed in the High Court within 20 working days of the date on which the Tribunal’s decision is served. The procedure to be followed is set out in part 20 of the High Court Rules. _________________ _________________ ___________...

5. Deputy Registrar - Estate of Joseph Smith I [2017] Chief Judge's MB 1 (2017 CJ 1) [pdf, 246 KB]

   ...Judgment: 24 January 2017 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2017 Chief Judge’s MB 2 Introduction [1] This application filed by the Deputy Registrar, Māori Land Court Te Waipounamu, seeks to amend a succession order made on 3 July 1973 at 107 Napier MB 53 relating to Joseph Smith I’s (the deceased) interest in Lords River Block IX Sec 16 (Lords River Block)...

6. KB and SB v EQC [2020] CEIT-2020-0021 [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...cover their costs in bringing this application. [7] On 20 August 2020, Mr W, emailed the case manager indicating that the applicants wished to return to the Tribunal to adjudicate the dispute. [8] As a consequence, on 21 August 2020, EQC filed a memorandum seeking: (a) an award of costs to be paid, under s 47 of the Canterbury Insurance Tribunal Act 2020 (the CEIT Act) on the basis of bad faith; and (b) for this application to be discontinued; as EQC’s agreement to pay the...

7. Matchitt - Waioeka Parish 350A2A (2005) 88 Ōpōtiki MB 99 (88 OPO 99) [pdf, 2 MB]

   ...ascertain whether the site and access on and off the site was suitable. The applicants were also to advertise notice of the application and date of hearing in the local newspaper. Effectively the applicants seek to occupy 1162 m2 as shown on the site plan filed with the application. The applicants initially did not hold sufficient shares to equate to the area required for the occupation order. To occupy this area they needed another 0.5 shares. Maori Land Court Hearings The application...

8. Te Hiwi v Tahamata Incorporation (2005) 148 Aotea MB 265 (148 AOT 265) [pdf, 606 KB]

   ...Incorporation Section 280, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 John Te Hiwi, in person Mr E A Macdonald for the Tahamata Incorporation 2 December 2003, 16 March 2004 RESERVED DECISION On 2 September 2003 John Te Hiwi ("the Applicant") filed an application pursuant to section 280 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act ("the Act") for an investigation into the affairs of an incorporation called Tahamata ("the Incorporation"). The principal ground for seeking an investi...

9. Collins - Kehamane 2A1 (2005) 57 Wairarapa MB 139 (57 WAI 139) [pdf, 1.4 MB]

   ...members of the preferred class to file in th Maori Land Court at Hastings, no later than 8 October 2004, "written notice of the p rson's intentions" with respect to the land. The Notice went on to say that "if no suc notice is filed within the time fixed by this notice, the court may confirm the sale a d change the status described above with no further notice." In the event, notice was rece ed within the prescribed limeframe by the court from Leanne McGregor De...

10. Guidelines for Parties to Review [pdf, 134 KB]

    ...formality as is consistent with a proper consideration of the review. 28. All evidence should be made available to the LCRO prior to a hearing. This will usually comprise of information considered by the Standards Committee (the Standards Committee file will have been obtained by the LCRO) and any further explanations and submissions provided by the parties for the review. 29. Hearings before the LCRO, unless otherwise directed, are conducted in an investigative manner. The LCRO may p...