18737 items matching your search terms
...Judgment: 24 January 2017 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2017 Chief Judge’s MB 2 Introduction [1] This application filed by the Deputy Registrar, Māori Land Court Te Waipounamu, seeks to amend a succession order made on 3 July 1973 at 107 Napier MB 53 relating to Joseph Smith I’s (the deceased) interest in Lords River Block IX Sec 16 (Lords River Block)...
...cover their costs in bringing this application. [7] On 20 August 2020, Mr W, emailed the case manager indicating that the applicants wished to return to the Tribunal to adjudicate the dispute. [8] As a consequence, on 21 August 2020, EQC filed a memorandum seeking: (a) an award of costs to be paid, under s 47 of the Canterbury Insurance Tribunal Act 2020 (the CEIT Act) on the basis of bad faith; and (b) for this application to be discontinued; as EQC’s agreement to pay the...
...ascertain whether the site and access on and off the site was suitable. The applicants were also to advertise notice of the application and date of hearing in the local newspaper. Effectively the applicants seek to occupy 1162 m2 as shown on the site plan filed with the application. The applicants initially did not hold sufficient shares to equate to the area required for the occupation order. To occupy this area they needed another 0.5 shares. Maori Land Court Hearings The application...
...Incorporation Section 280, Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 John Te Hiwi, in person Mr E A Macdonald for the Tahamata Incorporation 2 December 2003, 16 March 2004 RESERVED DECISION On 2 September 2003 John Te Hiwi ("the Applicant") filed an application pursuant to section 280 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act ("the Act") for an investigation into the affairs of an incorporation called Tahamata ("the Incorporation"). The principal ground for seeking an investi...
...members of the preferred class to file in th Maori Land Court at Hastings, no later than 8 October 2004, "written notice of the p rson's intentions" with respect to the land. The Notice went on to say that "if no suc notice is filed within the time fixed by this notice, the court may confirm the sale a d change the status described above with no further notice." In the event, notice was rece ed within the prescribed limeframe by the court from Leanne McGregor De...
...formality as is consistent with a proper consideration of the review. 28. All evidence should be made available to the LCRO prior to a hearing. This will usually comprise of information considered by the Standards Committee (the Standards Committee file will have been obtained by the LCRO) and any further explanations and submissions provided by the parties for the review. 29. Hearings before the LCRO, unless otherwise directed, are conducted in an investigative manner. The LCRO may p...
...Māori land retention and alienation Craig Innes WTU #A15 Māori in the Taihape inquiry district: a sociodemographic scoping exercise Georgie Craw WTU #A28 In directions released earlier this year, the Tribunal granted an extension to the filing date of CFRT research to 20 May 2016. Staff are very pleased to announce that all research has been completed in the CFRT research programme. We extend thanks to the researchers who committed to this final deadline despite the minor del...
...Trust BETWEEN PENETANA HURIWAI Applicant Hearing: 3 October 2016 (Heard at Gisborne) Judgment: 04 April 2017 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE C L FOX Introduction [1] On 2 May 2016 Penetana Huriwai filed an application pursuant to ss 231 and 244 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (the Act) concerning Hinetiraha A2C Trust (the Trust). The applicant seeks an order to vary the trust deed on the basis that it has not been updated since...
...from 13 May 2017. (c) The decision to continue suspension of the NZS payments for XXXX and supplementary payments for AS, DA, and TAS until the appellants provide the Ministry with the information it has requested. [10] After the appeal was filed, the Ministry reinstated XXXX’s NZS payments as of 22 March 2017 on the basis that her NZS entitlement was not income tested. As a result, she received an arrears payment of $2,242.82 for the period from 22 March 2017 to 16 May 2017....
...4 [21] In considering the question as to an appropriate penalty, the Committee noted that it “considered Mr PR’s conduct in relation to collateral rewards in the form of referral fees was serious”. Application for review [22] Mr PR filed an application for review on 28 January 2021. [23] The focus of his review is narrowly confined to the issue of penalty. Mr PR does not challenge the unsatisfactory conduct finding, nor the other orders made by the Standards Committee...