Search Results

1. AB v XY LCRO 82/2013 and 379/2013 (9 June 2014) [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...breach of professional duties and obligations. Yours faithfully [AB] 15 March – RS to AB [AB] We accept the limitations you have without instructions. Thankyou for trying. [RS] 5 [17] From a review of Mr AB’s files, it would appear that he received no further communication from Mr XV. It would also appear that his fees remained unpaid. [18] From a letter dated 18 September 2012 from Mr RS to the trustees of the MET it is apparent that a settlemen...

2. LCRO 247/2015 TL v CS (19 July 2017) [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...competition within the profession and a client’s access to specialist advice. [20] Mr TL was censured. The Committee ordered publication of the facts of the decision without identification of the parties. Application for review [21] Mr TL filed an application for review on 30 November 2015. The outcome sought by him is that the Committee’s decision be reversed. He states that contrary to [1] of the determination he was not, and has not been a partner in [Firm A]. [22] H...

3. Paul - Motatau 1B3A (2010) 11 Taitokerau MB 212 (11 TTK 212) [pdf, 130 KB]

   ...conducted in conjunction with the application to succeed to Heneriata Weera. 11 Taitokerau MB 217 [17] The application came before me for a final hearing on 14 October 2010. The application for succession to Heneriata Weera had been filed and both applications were heard together. Other descendants of Heneriata Weera attended the hearing in addition to Mrs Paul, namely, Arabella Peri, Whakarongotai Rosie Tipene and Wiremu Morton. They confirmed that they also wished th...

4. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 66 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 7.1 MB]

   ...histor- ical Treaty claims, which is of immense importance to Māori, the Crown, and New Zealand in general. Beside this work, this year we intend to start a new inquiry programme that will schedule hearings of the kaupapa (non-land based) claims filed with us. We have heard such claims in the past where claimants successfully sought an urgent inquiry, such as the recent Wai 262 (flora and fauna and indigenous knowledge), freshwater and geo- thermal resources, and kōhanga reo inqu...

5. Waitangi Tribunal - issue 55 of Te Manutukutuku [pdf, 511 KB]

   ...RuapehuTa ra na ki co nfi sc ati on lin e S N EW mountains, ranges high country The majority of the Wairarapa ki Tararua research has been completed and research on the Tararua area is underway. Most re- search reports for Wairarapa were filed at the end of March. All re- ports are now due to be filed by 20 December 2002, in time for the casebook deadline. Once the casebook has been com- pleted, the inquiry will move into active conferencing. The Crown will respond to...

6. Vikashwarjeet v Devi [2014] NZIACDT 27 (17 March 2014) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...3 [6.10] On 17 February 2012, Immigration New Zealand declined the application for visitor visas on the grounds of the character issue the complainants raised when first instructing the adviser. Interim decision [7] The adviser filed a Statement of Reply denying liability; the statement asserted the Tribunal should dismiss the complaint. However, it did not fully address the complaint. In the circumstances, the Tribunal took the view it was important to ensure the advise...

7. LCRO 236-2015 DZ v EY [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...Application for review [10] In his application for review, Mr DZ relies on findings by the Family Court as support for the proposition that Ms FX was lying. Mr DZ contends Ms EY knew her client was lying, but consented to false evidence being filed and conspired in Ms FX’s deception. [11] Ms EY relies on the evidence and submissions she provided to the Committee. 3 Review hearing [12] Mr DZ attended a review hearing in Auckland on 27 March 2018. Ms EY was not required...

8. CAC 409 v Wong [2018] NZREADT 8 [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...required. If a hearing is required, the Case Manager will allocate a hearing date and the Tribunal will issue directions as to filing written submissions. If neither party seeks an oral hearing, penalty submissions on behalf of the Committee must be filed and served within 21 days of the date of this decision. Submissions by or on behalf of Mr Wong must be filed and served within a further 14 days, and penalty will then be determined on the papers. [63] Pursuant to s 113 of t...

9. Bradley v Jones - Miria Pene [2016] Chief Judge's MB 907 (2016 CJ 907) [pdf, 414 KB]

   ...JONES Respondent Judgment: 31 October 2016 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2016 Chief Judge’s MB 908 Introduction [1] This application filed by Barbara-Ann Bradley (the applicant) seeks to amend a succession order 1 relating to the 0.55555 shares in the Rerewhakaitu No.1A No.2B block (Rerewhakaitu) held by Miria Pene or Miria Jones or Miri Pine (the deceased), the applic...

10. Kupenga - Waitakaro B Māori Reservation (2006) 72 Ruatoria MB 184 (72 RUA 184) [pdf, 891 KB]

    ...4. The tenancy management of all 5 houses will be the responsibility of HNZC. [13] Mr Te Rau Kupenga's letter goes on to note that there is some urgency associated with this application. [14] A further letter dated i h of October 2005 was filed with the application. This letter is addressed to Robyn Rauna the Regional Manager of HNZC. This letter is signed by only 8 out of the 26 trustees who are recorded as administrators for this reservation. Minute Book: 72 RUA 189 [15...