Search Results

1. [2015] NZEmpC 133 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...application for leave by the defendant to file interlocutory application BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By affidavit and memorandum filed on 30 and 31 July 2015 Appearances: MW O'Brien and B Nicholson, counsel for plaintiff C Meechan QC and J Douglas, counsel for defendant Judgment: 3 August 2015 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 18) OF CHIEF JUDGE G...

2. [2021] NZEmpC 28 Juyi International Ltd v Pan [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...asserts that its claim is strong, and that were it to succeed in the hearing of its challenge having paid the contested sum to Mr Pan, recovery would be problematic because he would be unlikely to voluntarily return the monies paid. [7] Mr Pan filed a notice of opposition, essentially asserting that the Authority’s conclusion as to the application of the Holidays Act 2003 was correct. He did not file any evidence as to the issue concerning difficulties of repayment if Juyi’s c...

3. [2020] NZEnvC 012 NZ Fairy Tern Charitable Trust v Auckland Council [pdf, 282 KB]

   ...residual concerns with the court by 5 April 2020. The Auckland council is directed to file that report. All parties concur and these directions stand. The application for declarations [4] In November further applications for declarations were filed and these were the subject of general discussion by the court at the previous pre-hearing conference. 3 However, it would be fair to say the courts focus on that day was around seeing a reduction of the dam and the naturalisation of...

4. Smart v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late appeal to the District Court) [2022] NZACC 242 [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Judgment on the papers. Submissions: B Thompson for the Appellant L Hansen for the Respondent Date of Judgment: 8 December 2022 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Late filing of an appeal to the District Court – s 151, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] The appeal in the above matter was lodged by Ms Smart on 2 September 2022. The appeal is from the decision of a Reviewer dated 29 July 20...

5. OIA-97101.pdf [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...',,'-, ·, , -~/ . / . , \ ,.~"" Table 2: Percentage of Applicants for Without_JJf ~~.1,, pa rte appli~_9Q~s ~l_~~~t the Family Courts, by gender, between the 2012 and 2021 calendar years.!, i.._/>;,_, . , .,/, -/ (c Calendar year Filing method Applicant Gender 2012 2013 2014 -· .:.2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 < ~ _3, % 32% 31% 30% 29% _U_n_k~_O_Y-J___,n.._,,~-+----,L-+'---- - l-%_0_______,.,,.."-~0""',·0 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%...

6. [2023] NZEmpC 88 Carrington Resort Jade LP v Roy [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...hearing of the challenge. [9] Ms Roy provided submissions on those matters; Carrington did not. Good faith report details numerous incidents of concern [10] The Authority notes that Carrington engaged with the Authority in that it: (a) filed a statement in reply; (b) attended a case management conference; (c) provided some, minimal, documents to the Authority; (d) filed some witness statements; and (e) filed costs submissions. [11] The instances in which the Authori...

7. WHT - Guidelines for self represented claimants on documents required for hearing [pdf, 78 KB]

   1 A Particulars of Claim The following information should be included in the final particulars of claim filed to support the claim. If this information has already been filed with the claim documents and does not need changing or adding to there is no need to provide it again. More often however there has been the addition and / or removal of parties or changes to the amounts being claimed. In addition additional information has become available throughout the a...

8. BA v ZU LCRO 65/2014 (13 May 2014) [pdf, 29 KB]

   ...posted on 8 January 2014. [3] On perusal of information attached to the decision which informed the Applicant of her review rights, the Applicant was alerted to concern that the delay in receiving the decision may have jeopardised her ability to file an application for review. [4] The applicant was advised that a Review Officer would need to consider whether the application was filed after the expiry of the statutory timeframe for a review 2 application to be made. The Appl...

9. 2021-04-28 Minute - PC7 - general directions [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...Brass is also excused attendance on 5 and 6 May 2021 subject to the direction that Mr Brass reviews and signs the JWS (tracking amendments if required) by Friday 7 May 2021. [5] However, the court does not agree with the proposal that the filing of the JWS waits on Mr Farrell’s review of the same. Instead, Mr Farrell may file supplementary evidence noting any areas of agreement and disagreement, giving reasons for the same. This may be done by appending an annotated copy of...

10. After the hearing

    ...after the hearing if leave is granted) you can apply for a costs order.  A costs order relates to the legal costs of the proceeding and may include a claim to be reimbursed for expenses that have been incurred relating to the litigation, such as filing fees, hearing fees or other out-of-pocket expenses. Whether to award costs, and the amount of them, is at the discretion of the Judge.  Generally, the successful party is entitled to an award of costs.  Before any decision is made...

    Located in:

    1. Employment Court >
    2. What to expect at the Employment Court